???
I don't follow, I'm suggesting we ignore both statements "from each according to his ability" and "to each according to his need"
I was being sarcastic when I said "to each according to his need" in my prior post.
So please explain to me how pricing would work under a system like this?
I'm not going to overanalyze your analogy. My point relates to what you wrote below:
This goes on until eventually the government has the money...which is the end result of socialism...transfer of true wealth from the individual to the collective (government)
The 6 heirs of Wal-Mart hold more wealth than the bottom 42% of Americans combined. The rest of us are getting very tired of them and other like them screaming about socialism and how the government is going to collect all the wealth. They sit atop more wealth than any human in history could fathom, and tell us the government wants to rob us?
I'm not asking you to clarify how a "fair" system should work with taxes and distribution, I'm asking why you think any of the workers should give a [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] if the Wal-Mart heirs don't like it.
Upvote
0