Viral Video Showing 'Teens' Abusing Helpless Puppies

[777Sloan]

Smh: High School Teen Swings Dogs By Rope

 

[Favourofone]

True wonder is how a black man abusing puppies didn’t get shot dead by the police. I guess there is still time since they are trying to find the perpetrator.

At least the dogs are okay.

 

[iluvatar5150]

Why is the word "teens" in quotation marks?

 

[Favourofone]

Why is the word "teens" in quotation marks?

Considering OP has a message “it is ok to be white” maybe he didn’t want to write black but it is still implied subtly with those quotation marks.

 

[iluvatar5150]

Considering OP has a message “it is ok to be white” maybe he didn’t want to write black but it is still implied subtly with those quotation marks.

That would be consistent with the first comment on that article.

 

[ananda]

True wonder is how a black man abusing puppies didn’t get shot dead by the police. I guess there is still time since they are trying to find the perpetrator.

At least the dogs are okay.

Man? Where is the man?

 

[Favourofone]

Man? Where is the man?

If we get nitpickish about it....

A man is a male human. The term man is usually reserved for an adult male, with the term boy being the usual term for a male child or adolescent. However, the term man is also sometimes used to identify a male human, regardless of age

 

[ananda]

If we get nitpickish about it....

A man is a male human. The term man is usually reserved for an adult male, with the term boy being the usual term for a male child or adolescent. However, the term man is also sometimes used to identify a male human, regardless of age

That's not my full definition of a "man", which includes "one possessing in high degree the qualities considered distinctive of manhood (such as courage, strength, and vigor)"

 

[Sistrin]

Why is the word "teens" in quotation marks?

Why are you defending a guy swinging two dogs in the air and then tossing them across a parking lot?

 

[Favourofone]

Why are you defending a guy swinging two dogs in the air and then tossing them across a parking lot?

How is he defending the guy in any way ?

 

[Sistrin]

How is he defending the guy in any way ?

His question reveals the answer. He isn't reacting to the act of animals being mistreated, he is reacting to the fact someone posted about it. Which means he isn't angry over the fact animals were mistreated, he is angry over the fact someone posted about it.

 

[GoldenBoy89]

Why are you defending a guy swinging two dogs in the air and then tossing them across a parking lot?

Defending?

 

[GoldenBoy89]

His question reveals the answer. He isn't reacting to the act of animals being mistreated, he is reacting to the fact someone posted about it. Which means he isn't angry over the fact animals were mistreated, he is angry over the fact someone posted about it.

Funny, I wondered the same thing...

Do you think I'm okay with mistreating animals too?

 

[iluvatar5150]

Why are you defending a guy swinging two dogs in the air and then tossing them across a parking lot?

Why? Because I felt like baiting you into accusing me of things I didn't do. Congratulations.

His question reveals the answer. He isn't reacting to the act of animals being mistreated,

How do you know what I react to? This might surprise you, but I don't post everything that crosses my mind. I frequently choose to abstain from discussions or particular arguments, and for myriad reasons. My not registering a reaction on this one message board should not imply to anyone that I failed to have a reaction at all; and any inference that you or anyone else would make in that regard would likely be in error.

But if you want to know - yes, I reacted to it. But the perpetrator was caught on video, police are searching for him, and according to the reports, the dogs are ok. I don't know anybody involved with the crime; there's nothing I can do about it; and IMO, there's nothing really to talk about. Somebody did something bad and the wheels of justice appear to be turning. If that changes, well, we can reevaluate things then.

he is reacting to the fact someone posted about it.

I reacted to a specific use of grammar which may or may not have been intended to imply something. I didn't accuse the OP of anything; I merely asked a question.

The difference between the heading here and the attack in the video is that while I have no interaction with the people involved in the attack or influence over the investigation, I do interact with the OP and I do have some (if only a little) influence over the way things operate around here. My speaking up here about the attacker is just me bloviating into the ether; nothing changes. My speaking up here about misbehavior from another poster does have some potential effect (albeit a small one).

Which means he isn't angry over the fact animals were mistreated, he is angry over the fact someone posted about it.

You have no idea what I am and am not angry about, and I would advise you to address the content of my posts rather that the fictions you infer from them.

 

[TerranceL]

Sounds like something 4chan can take care of.

 

[Sistrin]

Sounds like something 4chan can take care of.

That is a threat, and so reported.

 

[LovebirdsFlying]

Mod Hat On

This thread is closed for review. Please bear with us as we look it over.

Mod Hat Off

 

[ewq1938]