- Jun 2, 2016
- 532
- 364
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
I think the Black Panthers are closer to the KKK than BLM. BLM is a violent left-wing version of the Tea Party movement.
I gotta say; what is to stop a professor from just getting in front of his class and straight up lying about everything in the subject area he is trying to teach.
You all seemed to have missed the point. Some deliberately, I know, but still. The issue here isn't how accurately one can compare BLM to the KKK, the issue is an American citizen being singled out and punished for exercising his First Amendment right, and only being so punished because he said something the liberal/progressive PC police do not want said.
This story serves as proof for a position which I and others have articulated here many times before. The liberal/progressive left does not want free speech, does not support free speech, and will not tolerate free speech. They will only tolerate speech with which they agree.
This is an issue between an employer and an employee, not the government and a regular citizen.
Yeah, I am sure all of those posting on Facebook in response to this and all of those who promoted this story in social media drawing attention to it worked in administration for the college.
1.) Police are not a race. That's probably the most significant difference right there. The Klan targets people because of their race and ethnicity... things they cannot change about themselves... A police officer could, in fact, quit his job. A black man cannot quit being black.All those police being killed isn't like a lynching? What about the chants of BLM? Didn't the lynch mobs have similar chants.
No it's not, but people do seem to like that narrative, huh?I think the Black Panthers are closer to the KKK than BLM. BLM is a violent left-wing version of the Tea Party movement.
No no! Because "Free Speech" means "neo-cons and sundry reactionaries can say what they like without fear of negative consequences"! Imean, that's what the constitution says, right? Just after the part about being a Christian nation and before the part about equality being limited to white Christian men.What are you talking about? You were complaining about free speech - "free speech" refers to the government's policy towards speech, not the reaction to speech by employers, the media, or the public at large. Is anyone calling for this guy to be fined or jailed for saying this? Or are they merely criticizing him for it? If they're calling for him to be fined or jailed, then I see your point, but if not, then your complaints about "free speech" are misplaced.
You can't prove otherwiseNo it's not, but people do seem to like that narrative, huh?