Unity and abortion

[Winken]

It will be functional if you dont kill it first

I'm confused about your posts, W2L. You seem to jump between points of view.

 

[W2L]

I'm confused about your posts, W2L. You seem to jump between points of view.

Please explain.

 

[Gregory Thompson]

I agree. I also think the Church should take care of widows, orphans, and single moms.

James would agree, but the more money a religious organization gets, the needs of the poor are not addressed, laws are even passed to outlaw helping the poor.

 

[Winken]

Please explain.

Your posts indicate that you are opposed to abortion, but then your answers to other posts indicate otherwise.

 

[Winken]

James would agree, but the more money a religious organization gets, the needs of the poor are not addressed, laws are even passed to outlaw helping the poor.

That is being turned around in the USA.

 

[W2L]

Your posts indicate that you are opposed to abortion, but then you answers to other posts indicate otherwise.

I oppose abortion. I dont think its in anyone's best interests to abort millions of babies.

 

[Gregory Thompson]

That is being turned around in the USA.

Helping the poor is a big christian value, so any change in this area is always appreciated.

 

[Winken]

I oppose abortion. I dont think its in anyone's best interests to abort millions of babies.

Thank You! Add to that "for any reason."

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

It will be functional if you dont kill it first

It isn't a soul yet without a brain.

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

Should Christians be politically united against abortion?

You might as well ask if Christians should be theologically united on the necessity of baptism for salvation. Different Christians will have different answers.

 

[Winken]

It isn't a soul yet without a brain.

You need Bible 101. And some insights into electro-chemical processes at the synaptic cleft.

 

[Winken]

You might as well ask if Christians should be theologically united on the necessity of baptism for salvation. Different Christians will have different answers.

Christians will have different answers on the murder of a child in the womb? What kind of "christianity" is that?

 

[W2L]

It isn't a soul yet without a brain.

Does it matter? Isnt God planning on putting a soul into it? Who are we to stand in His way?

 

[W2L]

You might as well ask if Christians should be theologically united on the necessity of baptism for salvation. Different Christians will have different answers.

No, one is about aborting a life, the other about baptism.

 

[W2L]

Thank You! Add to that "for any reason."

I dont believe there is any reason to abort millions of babies...

 

[bekkilyn]

Considering that abortion is not mentioned even once in scriptures, perhaps Christians need to actually be united in following Jesus and his example, and it also probably wouldn't hurt to stop being so politically opposed to programs that help the poor.

There is a whole lot in scripture about God's displeasure over the ill-treatment of the poor by various nations, but somehow it's given little if no importance compared to controlling what goes on inside some other person's womb vs. actually helping people once they are born, and also helping to create healthy and safe environments for children to be born into. Instead, we have "Christians" fighting tooth and nail against every social program and safety net that helps people.

I rarely see anything actually pro-life about the so-called "pro-life" movement.

 

[W2L]

Considering that abortion is not mentioned even once in scriptures, perhaps Christians need to actually be united in following Jesus and his example, and it also probably wouldn't hurt to stop being so politically opposed to programs that help the poor.

There is a whole lot in scripture about God's displeasure over the ill-treatment of the poor by various nations, but somehow it's given little if no importance compared to controlling what goes on inside some other person's womb vs. actually helping people once they are born, and also helping to create healthy and safe environments for children to be born into. Instead, we have "Christians" fighting tooth and nail against every social program and safety net that helps people.

I rarely see anything actually pro-life about the so-called "pro-life" movement.

America has plenty of social programs to help the poor.

 

[Winken]

Considering that abortion is not mentioned even once in scriptures, perhaps Christians need to actually be united in following Jesus and his example, and it also probably wouldn't hurt to stop being so politically opposed to programs that help the poor.

There is a whole lot in scripture about God's displeasure over the ill-treatment of the poor by various nations, but somehow it's given little if no importance compared to controlling what goes on inside some other person's womb vs. actually helping people once they are born, and also helping to create healthy and safe environments for children to be born into. Instead, we have "Christians" fighting tooth and nail against every social program and safety net that helps people.

I rarely see anything actually pro-life about the so-called "pro-life" movement.

I think you must live on another planet.

 

[W2L]

There is a whole lot in scripture about God's displeasure over the ill-treatment of the poor by various nations

What do you think God feels about the abortion of millions of babies?

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

Christians will have different answers on the murder of a child in the womb? What kind of "christianity" is that?

Where have you been? It's quite clear there are Christians on both sides of the abortion debate. Don't bother to say that one side isn't really Christian. That's the logical "no true scotsman" fallacy.