.
Last edited:
... It is a topic specifically mentioned in the OT and NT; God Himself divorced us for spiritual fornication, and this is a HUGE deal that can give insight on this thread...
The nations have all committed fornication with the enemy of Christ already, for many centuries.Maybe the OP wants to start the ball rolling with opinions. What is your understanding of spiritual fornication?
The nations have all committed fornication with the enemy of Christ already, for many centuries.
They will not understand it, nor accept it.
Most will not understand it, nor accept it, because their faith has not been in Yhwh alone, but in the prostitute / deceiver/ politics of the world system.
This has been known for centuries, and was revealed by Yhwh to many in the last several centuries.
It is still denied by most, as most (including me growing up) have been taught lies and teach lies
instead of seeking Yhwh's Kingdom and Truth in Jesus, by faith and grace as Yhwh permits and instructs.
because it's a mistaken notion. The church has always been mindful of the Scriptural admonition that we are to be IN THE WORLD but not OF the world. Your theory would have us be neither.What are thoughts on this topic, and why or why isn't it taught more often in the Church?
because it's a mistaken notion. The church has always been mindful of the Scriptural admonition that we are to be IN THE WORLD but not OF the world. Your theory would have us be neither.
For one thing, that is but one small part of what "government" is all about. And for another, the scriptural reference you were pointing us to was concerned with a single issue--Christian believers ought to resolve differences within the church rather than suing each other in court, etc. That's a principle that is a far cry from the Amish-like approach you were advocating.How are we not of the world if we seek the counsel and ruling of human courts?
For one thing, that is but one small part of what "government" is all about. And for another, the scriptural reference you were pointing us to was concerned with a single issue--Christian believers ought to resolve differences within the church rather than suing each other in court, etc. That's a principle that is a far cry from the Amish-like approach you were advocating.
Worldly affairs? You talk as though politics is totally about casino gambling or aggressive warmaking.I don't believe so. We are fighting over disputes and we are seeking our respective politicians to resolve them. Not to mention, its more than that. Are you saying its ok to be divided over worldly matters? .
The individual ought to be merciful when he personally is wronged. That's not what you're talking about with this example.Look at Christians, they rally for death penalties although God says that mercy is better than judgment.
It is fraught with dangers because many people who are ungodly are interested in using government to control other people. But this does not mean that the Godly people have to give them a free hand to do that.Are you sure politics are a godly endeavor?
Worldly affairs? You talk as though politics is totally about casino gambling or aggressive warmaking.
Right to life, freedom of religion, your right to own what you've earned by honest labor, a penal system, and a dozen other very moral issues are up for consideration one way or the other--with the decision being imposed upon believers by the State. Christians do indeed have a stake in that.
Of course, for them to put politics above or in place of spiritual matters is something that I think all of us should be against, but that isn't something that automatically happens merely because the churches and people play their part in the nation's affairs.
The individual ought to be merciful when he personally is wronged. That's not what you're talking about with this example.
It is fraught with dangers because many people who are ungodly are interested in using government to control other people. But this does not mean that the Godly people have to give them a free hand to do that.
How are we not of the world if we seek the counsel and ruling of human courts?
Voting for a politician who will impose a death penalty is just the same as stoning the person yourself. The Jews Cried out to the Roman heads of state "Crucify Him!". I don't want to follow their same path of folly.
What if the world, for instance breaks a contract with you? The scripture, as mentioned, is concerning your Christian brothers, and not ending up in court with them. And in a perfect Christian world they won't, but still, it could happen, and I seriously doubt that's a big problem with God, beats the heck out of settling things it in a worse way.
Sometimes there are legit disagreements that are best handled in court.
1 Corinthians 6:7 ►Sometimes there are legit disagreements that are best handled in court.
Well, "politicians" don't impose the death penalty. The death penalty is merely made available (in exceptionally rare cases) by politicians who enact laws that permit it.Voting for a politician who will impose a death penalty is just the same as stoning the person yourself.