Ouch.Because we are literate.
Let me guess, Trump 2020?I have no Idea what you are talking about. Do you have something from someone else to present?
Because we are literate.
You haven’t proven anything. Not a single person here is seeing your proof. You have ignored many of our posts because you couldn’t refute our points.Why is it that you cannot present an argument? You comments refute nothing. They prove nothing. Break it down as I have, present your arguments and lets debate. Opinion is subjective. Pot shot comments are entering but not proof of anything.
Let me guess, Trump 2020?
You haven’t proven anything. Not a single person here is seeing your proof. You have ignored many of our posts because you couldn’t refute our points.
Oh, BTW, who is the man in the video and how is he involved with the pact?
That isn't some random right winger reading these terms/goals off the list.
Why is it that you cannot present an argument? You comments refute nothing. They prove nothing. Break it down as I have, present your arguments and lets debate. Opinion is subjective. Pot shot comments are entertaining but not proof of anything.
Your argument is based on fantasy. There is literally nothing to refute.
For one thing, the globally accepted concept of burden of proof requires that you, the claimant, support your own claim; under the standards that reasonable people agree to, it is simply not the responsibility of the challenger (or in this case, the entire group of us) to "disprove" your claim.You cannot disprove what I laid out. You know it too.
Not so - you have more or less brought this on yourself through your repeated abuses of the principles of fair debate and your refusal to accept that wishful think does not make a text say something it doesn't.That's why there is such vitriol.
Well, then, I have great news for you. Take a deep breath, try to summon some objectivity, and re-read the entire thread. You will, to your great delight if you really mean what you say above, discover that, in fact, you have indeed been "ripped a new one".Truth about any of this it gets kinda boring just attack after attack..... I miss the days a person with a doctorate in the topic would read your post and rip you a new one, while schooling you. Thats fun.
Truth about any of this it gets kinda boring just attack after attack..... I miss the days a person with a doctorate in the topic would read your post and rip you a new one, while schooling you. Thats fun. Having an educated discussion with someone that can and is willing to actually show you their argument and the flaws in your own.
link it if you would please.I showed you where you were reading it wrong. My first post on this. Instead of really addressing what I said, you took the Conspiracy Train to Crazy Town then blamed me when you got there and the shopping sucked.
Well, then, I have great news for you. Take a deep breath, try to summon some objectivity, and re-read the entire thread. You will, to your great delight if you really mean what you say above, discover that, in fact, you have indeed been "ripped a new one".
Several new ones, as a matter of fact.
In post #3 you list multiple men. Which is the speaker, and what is his relationship to the proposed pact?I posted that in post #3. It wasn't a shocker when others went all bonkers about pointing it out either.
UN Migration Pact. Why we didn't sign it
In post 6 I acknowledge he is right wing.
I'm not ignoring you. I have already discussed what you are brinig up.
Now, the international law they keep referring to is The International Bill of Human Rights.
And if you say anything negative about it at all, even if you whine a little you go right to the front of the class. No incitement for you. You are straight out discriminating, and intolerant. Hate crime. God forbid you actually try to impede or slow down how many come into your area.
This is only related to this one topic. The criminalisation of speech against migration. Making any critical speech of immigration a criminal offense. I will get to another one latter.
Any media outlets that "give room" to this type of speech can be shut down.
...stopping allocation of public funding or material support to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants, in full respect for the freedom of the media
When's the last time you went to the polls to vote on a UN mandate; that is enforceable by international law, on american soil?