This is one of the few ways I saw WW3 breaking out. Thankfully Russia and Turkey are meeting in person soon, so hopefully things can get smoothed over.
If the US and NATO call the bluff and back Turkey, which it looks like we are, Putin is in hot water. He can do nothing and look weak, or risk starting a world war. Neither are good options for him. Have to see how good his political gymnastics are. Fortunately for him, everyone has some vested interest in helping him maintain his tough guy image rather than risk a third world war.Glenn Beck said the same thing. With so many countries who aren't exactly friendly with each other fighting in the same arena, there are bound to be problems that will only widen the conflict. Now, imagine if a Russian plane downs a US plane, or vice versa. Maybe a Russian cruise missile goes off course and hits an American base.
If the US and NATO call the bluff and back Turkey, which it looks like we are, Putin is in hot water. He can do nothing and look weak, or risk starting a world war. Neither are good options for him. Have to see how good his political gymnastics are. Fortunately for him, everyone has some vested interest in helping him maintain his tough guy image rather than risk a third world war.
We won't want to back down because that could fracture NATO, which is what Putin wants. Those planes weren't violating Turkish air space by accident. He was looking for a wedge. They know Erdogan isn't exactly our favorite person, or the most stable, so they immediately attacked him as "unstable" and "crazy" after the incident, hoping NATO would bite. While many from the NATO side seemed to echo the "unstable" comments, they still backed Turkey, because that's how NATO do. Now Erdogan is also in hot water, he has to find a way to kiss behind and let Putin maintain a tough image, while still maintaining his own.Oh great! I guess things are even worse than we thought! Everyone wants to flex their muscles and nobody is backing down, although it would probably be Obama that would do that first. He's bluffed before in that region, and I'm sure Russia and anyone else on the other side would love to call his bluff again.
Your anti-American attitude is well-noted.
I hope you remember a time not too long ago when Germany a place known for doing some things that America had to come there to stop. Some guy named Adolph was in charge there at that time. It was your people who elected him: http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/adolf-hitler-becomes-president-of-germany
We won't want to back down because that could fracture NATO, which is what Putin wants. Those planes weren't violating Turkish air space by accident. He was looking for a wedge. They know Erdogan isn't exactly our favorite person, or the most stable, so they immediately attacked him as "unstable" and "crazy" after the incident, hoping NATO would bite. While many from the NATO side seemed to echo the "unstable" comments, they still backed Turkey, because that's how NATO do. Now Erdogan is also in hot water, he has to find a way to kiss behind and let Putin maintain a tough image, while still maintaining his own.
It's all a very lovely web that could collapse and murder millions at any moment. Sleep well .
Pakistan was not as radicalised as IS. Partition would grant sovereign status to the Caliphate of death and demons. Millions of people were displaced and many died in Indias partition. There were several wars between the states. One half of Syria would be under Assad and the other radicalised Sunnis who will support whatever nutjob Islamist death cult is on top this year. Better to have the West dominate the East and put a lid on it. Time to end the chaos.
In Iraq however giving the Kurds their own state seems a good idea. But not sure how the Sunni bit should be handled.
If the US and NATO call the bluff and back Turkey, which it looks like we are, Putin is in hot water. He can do nothing and look weak, or risk starting a world war. Neither are good options for him. Have to see how good his political gymnastics are. Fortunately for him, everyone has some vested interest in helping him maintain his tough guy image rather than risk a third world war.
You speak as if the West actually has the decisive word in that. The region is beyond domination by the West.
Hitler was supported by US corporations and was actively brought into power.
Of course. Haven't you worked that poster out yet? If bad-blame America, if good-credit Germany. Hitler was bad, therefore, blame America.So the US was responsible for Hitler coming to power, not the Grrman people. Right.
So the US was responsible for Hitler coming to power, not the Grrman people. Right.
Sorry- West of Syria dominate East of Syria - should have been clearer.
My point was partition might work for the Kurds but it is doubtful it would work out for Sunni Iraq and East Syria in the current setup
So you might understand why it sounds so funny when a german is confronted about Hitler from an american. Hitler was your wish candidate. Hitler not only got the funds from USA, but also his ideology. Eugentics, euthanasia and all this was a concept made from american philosophers. Even his greeting was something he copied from your cheerleaders.
Funny fact, the Holocaust would never be that efficient if IBM would not have supported it so hard. All this data was processed by advanced Hollerith machines. IBM even send staff to the camps to keep the system in perfect condition.