Tulsi Gabbard irks left after citing Project Veritas in call to ban ballot harvesting

[NightHawkeye]

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard irks left after citing Project Veritas in call to ban ballot harvesting

“Project Veritas offers further evidence of the need to ban ballot harvesting,” Mrs. Gabbard tweeted to her 890,000 followers. “It’s not a partisan issue. It’s been abused to help both R & D candidates, including in North Carolina & California.”

“Congress needs to pass our bipartisan bill to ban ballot harvesting so no one can exploit our sacred right to vote,” she wrote in another tweet.​

 

[Tiberius Lee]

“We have not seen, historically, any kind of coordinated national voter fraud effort in a major election, whether it’s by mail or otherwise,” Christopher Wray - Sep 24, 2020

 

[Fantine]

She is a lame duck. I personally had trust issues about her.

 

[SimplyMe]

I agree with making "vote harvesting" illegal in all states.

I also agree when Democrats criticize Tulsi Gabbard for implying that Project Veritas is legitimate. They've been proven too often to use bias and selective editing to falsify their claims. I have no idea if what they are claiming here is true but, even if this video does show illegal ballot harvesting, they have not tied it to Ms. Omar or that it was something her campaign authorized.

 

[NightHawkeye]

She is a lame duck.

That would be good.

 

[NightHawkeye]

I agree with making "vote harvesting" illegal in all states.

 

[Vylo]

Invoking veritas is a nearly instant way to tell people your arguments are invalid.

 

[cow451]

Tulsi must be losing her grip on reality after wiping out in the primaries. Sad.

I predict she will become the Beach Party nominee in four years....

 

[Pathfinder627]

Invoking veritas is a nearly instant way to tell people your arguments are invalid.

Seriously? Do you watch any of their videos? They let the perpetrators speak for themselves. It's all on tape. Unless you're saying these are "Deep Fakes". Is that what you're going with? Then the burden of proof is on you. Simply being smug and dismissive about it isn't much of a help in your case.

 

[Pommer]

Seriously? Do you watch any of their videos? They let the perpetrators speak for themselves. It's all on tape. Unless you're saying these are "Deep Fakes". Is that what you're going with? Then the burden of proof is on you. Simply being smug and dismissive about it isn't much of a help in your case.

Project Veritas is the epitome of propaganda; that you’re “able” to “see the truth” means that you’ve bought into the spiel.
These are not “just journalists seeking ‘the truth’!”, they’re pushing a point of view and their production is geared toward you buying into it.

 

[SimplyMe]

Seriously? Do you watch any of their videos? They let the perpetrators speak for themselves. It's all on tape. Unless you're saying these are "Deep Fakes". Is that what you're going with? Then the burden of proof is on you. Simply being smug and dismissive about it isn't much of a help in your case.

Maybe this article on "Manipulative Editing" will help you see how a company can show what is on tape, but completely distort what was said. This is what Project Veritas has been found, multiple times, to do.