Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Trump worker told FBI about moving Mar-a-Lago boxes on ex-president’s orders
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wing2000" data-source="post: 76957040" data-attributes="member: 314005"><p>It's only a matter of time before Trump will be indicted. </p><p></p><p><em>Directing employees to move documents sought by a subpoena is the sort of damning evidence one rarely sees in federal prosecution. “The employee is unlikely to be charged if he continues to cooperate,” former prosecutor Renato Mariotti <a href="https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/status/1580311294996946945" target="_blank">tweets</a>. “But his testimony suggests that Trump tried to keep documents from the DOJ, which had already served a grand jury subpoena for the documents *before* the employee was ordered to move them.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Mariotti <a href="https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/status/1580311938864586752" target="_blank">continues</a>: “This testimony, combined with other facts (such as the false certification to the DOJ) suggests an effort to hide the documents from the federal government. This evidence is an aggravating factor that could weigh in favor of charging Trump.”</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Such conduct would not only fit the definition of an “aggravating factor” for an <a href="https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/the-espionage-acts-constitutional-legacy" target="_blank">Espionage Act</a> indictment but, if true, likely constitute a separate crime of obstruction. (This would explain the reference to the section of the U.S. Code relevant to obstruction in the application for an affidavit.)</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/10/13/trump-document-concealment-indictment-likely/" target="_blank">https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/10/13/trump-document-concealment-indictment-likely/</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wing2000, post: 76957040, member: 314005"] It's only a matter of time before Trump will be indicted. [I]Directing employees to move documents sought by a subpoena is the sort of damning evidence one rarely sees in federal prosecution. “The employee is unlikely to be charged if he continues to cooperate,” former prosecutor Renato Mariotti [URL='https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/status/1580311294996946945']tweets[/URL]. “But his testimony suggests that Trump tried to keep documents from the DOJ, which had already served a grand jury subpoena for the documents *before* the employee was ordered to move them. Mariotti [URL='https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/status/1580311938864586752']continues[/URL]: “This testimony, combined with other facts (such as the false certification to the DOJ) suggests an effort to hide the documents from the federal government. This evidence is an aggravating factor that could weigh in favor of charging Trump.” Such conduct would not only fit the definition of an “aggravating factor” for an [URL='https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/the-espionage-acts-constitutional-legacy']Espionage Act[/URL] indictment but, if true, likely constitute a separate crime of obstruction. (This would explain the reference to the section of the U.S. Code relevant to obstruction in the application for an affidavit.) [/I] [URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/10/13/trump-document-concealment-indictment-likely/[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Trump worker told FBI about moving Mar-a-Lago boxes on ex-president’s orders
Top
Bottom