• Do not add comments to posts once the thread has been closed for review. A closed thread means there should not be any further comment. Commenting in closed threads can result in a ban.

Trump worker told FBI about moving Mar-a-Lago boxes on ex-president’s orders

disciple Clint

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2018
14,581
5,767
Pacific Northwest
✟178,395.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
He advocated something illegal to the President's Chief of Staff on January 5th.
Since he was a participant in the push to get Pence to overturn the election on January 6th, it's not appropriate for him to be on the committee.

Rep. Jim Jordan's office confirmed Wednesday that the Ohio Republican was one of the lawmakers whose text messages to then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows were released this week by the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

"On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all."

The rest of the text added ostensibly supporting arguments intended to defend the dangerous claim that Pence had the authority to disregard electoral votes Republicans disapproved of.
Since when is it against the law to provide a legal opinion or a personal opinion, oh I forgot, anyone who expresses an opinion in contrast to a liberal opinion is not worthy and needs to be immediately canceled.
 
Upvote 0

disciple Clint

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2018
14,581
5,767
Pacific Northwest
✟178,395.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Yessir, I promise to apologize the very minute Jordan testifies and turns over his evidence to the January 6th committee (or federal prosecutors) hahaha.

Timeline: Rep. Jim Jordan, a Systematic Disinformation Campaign, and January 6
That would be well after the decision was made regarding committee members wouldn't it so how would that justify eliminating him from the committee? Also since when is it his responsibility to prove that he did not do anything wrong, have we changed the values of this nation or is this just something that applies to those associated with Trump.
 
Upvote 0
Christian Counseling
  • Bible-based counseling
  • Available 24/7
  • Cancel Anytime
As a BetterHelp affiliate, we may receive compensation from BetterHelp if you purchase products or services through the links provided.

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
26,409
29,386
Los Angeles Area
✟660,947.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Since when is it against the law to provide a legal opinion or a personal opinion.

Take it up with Judge Carter, who has ruled that John Eastman's emails about this 'legal theory' (the very same theory Jordan was pushing -- indeed I believe Jordan was forwarding Eastman's text) "are sufficiently related to and in furtherance of a conspiracy to defraud the United States.”

That's a crime.

'OK, so there's evidence. But has there been a trial? Got you there!'
 
Upvote 0

disciple Clint

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2018
14,581
5,767
Pacific Northwest
✟178,395.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Take it up with Judge Carter, who has ruled that John Eastman's emails about this 'legal theory' (the very same theory Jordan was pushing -- indeed I believe Jordan was forwarding Eastman's text) "are sufficiently related to and in furtherance of a conspiracy to defraud the United States.”

That's a crime.

'OK, so there's evidence. But has there been a trial? Got you there!'
sufficiently related to and in furtherance
That is not a crime, if it were a crime, a crime would have been charged, it was not.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
26,409
29,386
Los Angeles Area
✟660,947.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
That is not a crime, if it were a crime, a crime would have been charged, it was not.

In context, the judge is declaring these emails to be non-privileged communications, so that they must be turned over to the DOJ for the investigation. Investigation first, indictments later.

Why are they non-privileged? Because conspiring to crime is not protected by lawyer-client privilege.
 
Upvote 0