Trump worker told FBI about moving Mar-a-Lago boxes on ex-president’s orders

[disciple Clint]

He advocated something illegal to the President's Chief of Staff on January 5th.
Since he was a participant in the push to get Pence to overturn the election on January 6th, it's not appropriate for him to be on the committee.

Rep. Jim Jordan's office confirmed Wednesday that the Ohio Republican was one of the lawmakers whose text messages to then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows were released this week by the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

"On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all."

The rest of the text added ostensibly supporting arguments intended to defend the dangerous claim that Pence had the authority to disregard electoral votes Republicans disapproved of.

Since when is it against the law to provide a legal opinion or a personal opinion, oh I forgot, anyone who expresses an opinion in contrast to a liberal opinion is not worthy and needs to be immediately canceled.

 

[disciple Clint]

Yessir, I promise to apologize the very minute Jordan testifies and turns over his evidence to the January 6th committee (or federal prosecutors) hahaha.

Timeline: Rep. Jim Jordan, a Systematic Disinformation Campaign, and January 6

That would be well after the decision was made regarding committee members wouldn't it so how would that justify eliminating him from the committee? Also since when is it his responsibility to prove that he did not do anything wrong, have we changed the values of this nation or is this just something that applies to those associated with Trump.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Since when is it against the law to provide a legal opinion or a personal opinion.

Take it up with Judge Carter, who has ruled that John Eastman's emails about this 'legal theory' (the very same theory Jordan was pushing -- indeed I believe Jordan was forwarding Eastman's text) "are sufficiently related to and in furtherance of a conspiracy to defraud the United States.”

That's a crime.

'OK, so there's evidence. But has there been a trial? Got you there!'

 

[disciple Clint]

Take it up with Judge Carter, who has ruled that John Eastman's emails about this 'legal theory' (the very same theory Jordan was pushing -- indeed I believe Jordan was forwarding Eastman's text) "are sufficiently related to and in furtherance of a conspiracy to defraud the United States.”

That's a crime.

'OK, so there's evidence. But has there been a trial? Got you there!'

sufficiently related to and in furtherance

That is not a crime, if it were a crime, a crime would have been charged, it was not.

 

[essentialsaltes]

That is not a crime, if it were a crime, a crime would have been charged, it was not.

In context, the judge is declaring these emails to be non-privileged communications, so that they must be turned over to the DOJ for the investigation. Investigation first, indictments later.

Why are they non-privileged? Because conspiring to crime is not protected by lawyer-client privilege.