Trump to be first president to attend March for Life

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
January 22, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – For the first time in history, a U.S. president will attend in person and speak at the annual March for Life that is happening in Washington D.C. on Friday.

President Trump announced today that he will be speaking at the 2020 March for Life on January 24, an annual event attended by hundreds of thousands to protest legal abortion.


“We are deeply honored to welcome President Trump to the 47th annual March for Life," said Jeanne Mancini, President of March for Life.

"He will be the first president in history to attend and we are so excited for him to experience in person how passionate our marchers are about life and protecting the unborn," she continued.

"From the appointment of pro-life judges and federal workers, to cutting taxpayer funding for abortions here and abroad, to calling for an end to late-term abortions, President Trump and his Administration have been consistent champions for life and their support for the March for Life has been unwavering. We are grateful for all these pro-life accomplishments and look forward to gaining more victories for life in the future," she added.

More at link: BREAKING: Trump to be first president to attend March for Life
 

GACfan

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2019
1,958
2,257
Texas
✟77,930.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

paul1149

that your faith might rest in the power of God
Site Supporter
Mar 22, 2011
8,460
5,268
NY
✟674,964.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Trump spoke live via video link last year, and Pence was the first VP to speak in person.

Some will no doubt call this a raw political move looking at the November election. But it's only the latest move in a sterling pro-life record. Trump has consistently proven himself to be the most pro-life president in history. Here is a list from Susan B. Anthony List. It goes to mid-year, 2019. Since then Trump has lobbied against abortion in the UN. And he has tied these things in with freedom of religious conscience rights.


✅ Appointed Pro-Life Judges
During the 2016 campaign, then-candidate Trump promised he would nominate pro-life justices to the U.S. Supreme Court. In the final presidential debate, Trump stated, “I am pro-life, and I will be appointing pro-life judges.” President Trump has already made significant progress on this commitment to the Pro-Life Movement. In April, 2017, Judge Neil Gorsuch was successfully confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court. And in October, 2018, Judge Brett Kavanaugh was successfully confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court. To date, 157 of President Trump’s judicial nominees have been confirmed, including two Supreme Court justices, forty-three U.S. Courts of Appeals judges, and one hundred thirteen District Court judges.

✅ Permitted States to Defund Planned Parenthood of Title X Funds
In April 2017, Congress sent a bill to President Trump’s desk that permits states to defund Planned Parenthood of Title X family planning funds passed in Congress. President Trump signed the bill which reverses an Obama-era rule that disbarred states from doing so. Because this was passed using the Congressional Review Act, future Administrations cannot enact a similar rule to Obama’s.

✅ Stopped Tax Dollars Funding Abortion Overseas
President Trump not only reinstated the Mexico City Policy, but expanded it to the new Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance program. This new policy ensures that our tax dollars are protected from funding the abortion industry overseas across ALL global health spending, not just family planning dollars. The Bush-era Mexico City Policy protected roughly $500 million in spending – the new Trump policy protects over $8.8 billion overseas aid from funding abortion.

✅ Defunded the Pro-Abortion UNFPA
The UNFPA has long been complicit in China’s oppressive population control activities, including birth limitation policies and forced abortions. President Trump’s State Department cut U.S. Taxpayer funding to the UNFPA.

✅ Required Health Insurance Companies to Disclose if Plans Cover Abortion
The Trump Administration Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) issued a rule requiring that insurers specify in each plan Summary of Benefits whether the plan covers abortion. The administration also requested input on how to better enforce the limited abortion provisions contained in Obamacare. Until Obamacare is overturned and replaced with a system that does not subsidize abortion coverage, insurers must make abortion coverage clear to persons shopping for a plan.

✅ Settlements & New Rule Regarding HHS Mandate
The Departments of HHS, Treasury, and Labor issued two interim final rules, which means they took effect immediately, while allowing a comment period, that provide permanent, enforceable relief from the previous HHS mandate for both religious objectors, such as Little Sisters of the Poor, and moral objectors, such as Susan B. Anthony List. The new rule also exempts private employers and educational institutions that have sincerely held religious beliefs or moral objections against providing contraceptives or abortifacient drugs.

✅ Strong Pro-Life Appointments to Key Positions Including:
Vice President Mike Pence, Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

✅ New Office for Conscience Protection at HHS
In May 2019, the Trump administration finalized new regulations to strengthen enforcement of federal laws protecting the conscience rights of health care workers who do not want to participate in abortion. The regulations clarify what recourse is available to victims of discrimination under the law and what penalties the HHS Office of Civil Rights may enforce for violations. Additionally, in January 2018, the Department of Health & Human Services announced the creation of the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division within the Office for Civil Rights. This new office works to protect health care professionals who do not want to participate in abortion. In May, 2019, HHS issued a proposed rule amending Obama-era regulations, clarifying that Section 1557 shall not force a recipient of federal funding to provide or pay for an abortion. It shall also be consistent with the First Amendment and with pro-life provisions, conscience provisions and religious liberty protections in current law.

✅ Allowed States to Defund Planned Parenthood of Medicaid Funds
The Obama administration attempted to prevent states from defunding Planned Parenthood of Medicaid dollars, issuing guidance claiming this may be a violation of federal law. In January 2018, the Trump administration rescinded this guidance, allowing states to defund Planned Parenthood of Medicaid dollars as they see fit.

✅ Cut Planned Parenthood’s Tax Funding by up to $60 Million
In February, 2019, the Trump administration finalized the Protect Life Rule to redirect Title X family planning program funds away from the abortion industry. The rule advances President Trump’s promise to stop taxpayer funding of abortion businesses like Planned Parenthood, who will no longer receive Title X funding if they choose not to comply.

✅ Canceled Huge Contract for Taxpayer-Funded Experimentation with Body Parts of Aborted Babies
In June, 2019, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced they would not renew a major contract with the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) to fund research using the body parts of aborted babies. (learn more)
 
Upvote 0

Mountainmanbob

Goat Whisperer
Site Supporter
Sep 6, 2016
15,961
10,817
73
92040
✟1,096,353.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
January 22, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – For the first time in history, a U.S. president will attend in person and speak at the annual March for Life that is happening in Washington D.C. on Friday.

President Trump announced today that he will be speaking at the 2020 March for Life on January 24, an annual event attended by hundreds of thousands to protest legal abortion.


“We are deeply honored to welcome President Trump to the 47th annual March for Life," said Jeanne Mancini, President of March for Life.

"He will be the first president in history to attend and we are so excited for him to experience in person how passionate our marchers are about life and protecting the unborn," she continued.

"From the appointment of pro-life judges and federal workers, to cutting taxpayer funding for abortions here and abroad, to calling for an end to late-term abortions, President Trump and his Administration have been consistent champions for life and their support for the March for Life has been unwavering. We are grateful for all these pro-life accomplishments and look forward to gaining more victories for life in the future," she added.

More at link: BREAKING: Trump to be first president to attend March for Life

And they keep asking me
what has Trump done to support Christian values.

March on President Trump.

M-Bob
 
Upvote 0

Jonathan Walkerin

Well-Known Member
Feb 12, 2019
3,720
2,772
44
Stockholm
✟72,396.00
Country
Sweden
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Before becoming president? Don't know.

Funny that. Almost like his piety coincidences with the coming elections and not from hearthfelt personal beliefs and his deep relationship with God.

Whatever appeals to his base I guess. If it guaranteed his re-election he would march for anything whatsoever.

Which is fine him being politician and all even expected but it really is not sign of any religious let alone moral
conviction and it is pretty silly to market it as such.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Jamsie
Upvote 0

Mountainmanbob

Goat Whisperer
Site Supporter
Sep 6, 2016
15,961
10,817
73
92040
✟1,096,353.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
and not from hearthfelt personal beliefs and his deep relationship with God.





Whatever appeals to his base I guess. If it guaranteed his re-election he would march for anything whatsoever.

Which is fine him being politician and all even expected but it really is not sign of any religious let alone moral
conviction and it is pretty silly to market it as such.

When it comes to Trump's heart and what God has going on in there, only ones very, very close to Trump would have a clue.

Hey, he wants to protect innocent babies.
That is an excellent sign.
In a positive direction.
Although some wish to turn it around
turn it around upside down.

M-Bob
 
Upvote 0

Jonathan Walkerin

Well-Known Member
Feb 12, 2019
3,720
2,772
44
Stockholm
✟72,396.00
Country
Sweden
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
When it comes to Trump's heart and what God has going on in there, only ones very, very close to Trump would have a clue.

Hey, he wants to protect innocent babies.

How is it even possible to contradict yourself in one sentence.....

First you say nobody but his close circle and God knows what his motivations are and then you immediately attribute that he wants to protect babies.

If he wanted to protect babies you would think he would be interested at stopping Saudi Arabia`s genocide in Yemen instead of selling them weapons.

Huge malnutrition toll on Yemen children

Not happening. American jobs and money are more important. MAGA. Guess Yemenese children are not that vital for US elections.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Mountainmanbob

Goat Whisperer
Site Supporter
Sep 6, 2016
15,961
10,817
73
92040
✟1,096,353.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...ecab5c-3e11-11ea-b90d-5652806c3b3a_story.html

Pro-lifers took the scraps they were thrown from the GOP table because they had nowhere else to go. In today’s Democratic Party, abortion is no longer treated as a necessary evil but as something to be embraced and even celebrated. In 2018, for example, New York’s Democratic governor, Andrew Cuomo, lit up One World Trade Center — the Freedom Tower — to celebrate the passage of a new law that removes most restrictions on abortion, even in the third trimester.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hazelelponi
Upvote 0

Hazelelponi

:sighing:
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2018
9,375
8,788
55
USA
✟691,108.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
How is it even possible to contradict yourself in one sentence.....

First you say nobody but his close circle and God knows what his motivations are and then you immediately attribute that he wants to protect babies.

If he wanted to protect babies you would think he would be interested at stopping Saudi Arabia`s genocide in Yemen instead of selling them weapons.

Huge malnutrition toll on Yemen children

Not happening. American jobs and money are more important. MAGA. Guess Yemenese children are not that vital for US elections.

Why is the state of other countries more vital somehow than the nearly million Americans being slaughtered EVERY year inside this country?

Compared to that everything else pales in comparison, to be perfectly honest. Your basically saying, millions of American children murdered? Who cares!

It's a ridiculous position. Why do American children of all races mean nothing to people?

because it doesn't forward the agenda one would suppose... the core of that message screams hatred for Americans, of every race.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Jonathan Walkerin

Well-Known Member
Feb 12, 2019
3,720
2,772
44
Stockholm
✟72,396.00
Country
Sweden
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Your basically saying, millions of American children murdered? Nothing to see here look over there, that's what we should look at. .

It's a ridiculous position.

What is a ridiculous position are people who are willing to live inside a nations borders, pay taxes to it`s government, be fervently nationalistic and armed against tyrannical government while claiming millions of children are murdered and still not doing anything about it apart from empty talk.

IF you really believed that. Why would you do any of those things ?

Easy enough. People do not really believe that.

Not so much that it would matter. Not so much it would spark strong reaction. Just enough to talk and post in forums. Maybe participate in rallies. Link few blogs and feel good about it.

Ask yourself. Is that all you would do if you saw millions of children shot in the streets by government agencies ? Hopefully not......
 
Upvote 0

Hazelelponi

:sighing:
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2018
9,375
8,788
55
USA
✟691,108.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
while claiming millions of children are murdered and still not doing anything about it apart from empty talk.

IF you really believed that. Why would you do any of those things ?

It's not a claim, first off, it's fact. Nearly 60 million American children, predominantly minorities, have been killed since Roe v. Wade.

and what are you asking, do any of what things? Be nationalistic?

I think being nationalistic will help people begin to hold respect for their own children's lives again... It's kind of funny, when patriotism and love of country left the heart of this country so did all respect for American life.

As far as being "armed", this natural right is a part of our constitution and is people's choice. If a solid look at history teaches you anything you'll note most mass killings of civilians by military dictatorships in the 1900s were more often than not preceded by the confiscation of firearms from targeted populations, a task made easier by laws requiring the registration and/or licensing of privately-owned weapons.

But that's a baseless and off topic topic altogether - perhaps we should focus on the issue of this thread instead of throwing everything against the wall to see what sticks.

Easy enough. People do not really believe t

Your a mind reader now?

Not so much that it would matter. Not so much it would spark strong reaction. Just enough to talk and post in forums. Maybe participate in rallies. Link few blogs and feel good about it.

Ask yourself. Is that all you would do if you saw millions of children shot in the streets by government agencies ? Hopefully not.....

It's not by government agencies. Government is only allowing people to do it.

And with the case bring such as it is, we cannot force people to respect life, (as we are in the minority if you haven't noticed) all we can do is to emphasize that life has meaning, it's not empty and worthless, and we should not kill our children but rather, have love for them.

Hearts and minds my freind, hearts and minds.

What do you do when your born into a society that thinks murder of their own children is perfectly normal and acceptable, who assuage their own guilty consciouses by "caring" for children of other nations instead of their own blood? (can anyone say hypocrisy)

I see it as a heart matter, a result of a broken and absolutely lost society without any understanding of right from wrong.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Jonathan Walkerin

Well-Known Member
Feb 12, 2019
3,720
2,772
44
Stockholm
✟72,396.00
Country
Sweden
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
It's not a claim, first off, it's fact. Nearly 60 million American children, predominantly minorities, have been killed since Roe v. Wade.

The number of abortions is probably correct. The claim they were persons that were killed is, unfortunately, debatable.

If a solid look at history teaches you anything you'll note most mass killings of civilians by military dictatorships in the 1900s were more often than not preceded by the confiscation of firearms from targeted populations, a task made easier by laws requiring the registration and/or licensing of privately-owned weapons

But you are saying that "mass killing of civilians" is happening right now. Infants even. While the populace is armed to teeth and do .....nothing.

So what was the point of having guns again? If populace is not defending infants then what will they defend it against ?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Hazelelponi

:sighing:
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2018
9,375
8,788
55
USA
✟691,108.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The number of abortions is probably correct. The claim they were persons that were killed is, unfortunately, debatable.



But you are saying that "mass killing of civilians" is happening right now. Infants even. While the populace is armed to teeth and do .....nothing.

So what was the point of having guns again? If populace is not defending infants then what will they defend it against ?

Hearts and minds is preferable to use of force, especially since this is seen as an issue of morality...

I will share the Gospel with you, plead with you to spare your family...

Would you prefer I force my morality on you? God doesn't allow it.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Funny that. Almost like his piety coincidences with the coming elections and not from hearthfelt personal beliefs and his deep relationship with God.

Whatever appeals to his base I guess. If it guaranteed his re-election he would march for anything whatsoever.

Which is fine him being politician and all even expected but it really is not sign of any religious let alone moral
conviction and it is pretty silly to market it as such.
He was not a politician before running for president. I guess he questioned why he should address the March for Life from the WH like all other GOP presidents when the crowd was already outside. Guess it makes sense to him.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How is it even possible to contradict yourself in one sentence.....

First you say nobody but his close circle and God knows what his motivations are and then you immediately attribute that he wants to protect babies.

If he wanted to protect babies you would think he would be interested at stopping Saudi Arabia`s genocide in Yemen instead of selling them weapons.

Huge malnutrition toll on Yemen children

Not happening. American jobs and money are more important. MAGA. Guess Yemenese children are not that vital for US elections.
Trump is responsible for starving people in Yemen? Was it not Iranian influence which started a was there in the first place?
 
Upvote 0

GACfan

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2019
1,958
2,257
Texas
✟77,930.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Funny that. Almost like his piety coincidences with the coming elections and not from hearthfelt personal beliefs and his deep relationship with God.

Whatever appeals to his base I guess. If it guaranteed his re-election he would march for anything whatsoever.

Which is fine him being politician and all even expected but it really is not sign of any religious let alone moral
conviction and it is pretty silly to market it as such.

Apparently he only wants to protect unborn children who aren't the result of rape or incest and who don't threaten the life of the mother because he supports abortions in these three different cases.

It's not as if one unborn child is any less dead if he or she is aborted because of a rape or incest or because the mother's life is threatened compared to another unborn child who is aborted because the mother decided she didn't want her child. An unborn child is still dead no matter what the reason or excuse was for the abortion. Let's be honest here, it isn't exactly an honest position for a person to support abortion in cases of rape or incest or the risk of the mother's life, but then condemn all other abortions and pompously act as if they're genuinely concerned for the lives of unborn children.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Apparently he only wants to protect unborn children who aren't the result of rape or incest and who don't threaten the life of the mother because he supports abortions in these three different cases.
He was pro-choice for years. You are correct he is for exceptions as every US GOP president has been perhaps excepting Reagan who was for the pro choice position as governor of California. We can hope and pray this move from pro-abortion, to pro-life with exceptions will evolve into a consistent pro-life stance.

It's not as if one unborn child is any less dead if he or she is aborted because of a rape or incest or because the mother's life is threatened compared to another unborn child who is aborted because the mother decided she didn't want her child.
The life of the mother has always been an exception even before Roe v Wade. And even the Catholic Church explains every life is precious including the mother's life. Their position is the one I have also. Every measure to preserve the life of all involved (mother and child) must be exercised. Doctors do this everyday as they conduct triage between patients.

The position of rape or incest cannot be defended applying moral logic:

Woman raped---Victim
Man who raped--Offender, Criminal
Child aborted because of the rape---Victim

In this case you see the only offender is the rapist. There is no capital punishment for rape. They get three hots and a cot and cable TV in prison if caught and convicted. Gets out in a few years for 'good behavior.' The human being in the womb did no wrong and is innocent life.

So yes, Trump to be truly consistent must see this blind spot in his philosophy as we have seen from many Republicans who support 'exceptions.'

The only morally supportable exception is the immediate danger of death to the pregnant woman (aka mother's life at risk). Why? Because God sees all human life as precious and the pregnant woman is no different.
 
Upvote 0