- Aug 3, 2012
- 25,294
- 24,205
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Obviously, given the number of people speaking on behalf of the soldier, there were other details. Is there somewhere that details both sides, not just
takes the shot at Trump?
This lays out details of the incident:
The story of Michael Behenna and Mad Dog 5: “Self-defense” in war - SCOTUSblog
There were arguably some procedural issues with his trial:
http://www.oag.ok.gov/Websites/oag/images/behenna.prestrump.agbarr.ltr.pdf
...if the argument were merely about granting a new trial, I would be fine with that. But to answer your question, it appears that some folks want to extend carte blanch to anybody in uniform and are perfectly okay with our guys acting like monsters, so long as they're "our guys."
Upvote
0