Oops three times. Georgia has merely been gleefully giving spoiler alerts, so far. We have to wait until the next damaging and corrupt thing about the Biden family comes out, and then issue it, to move Biden out of the news cycle.I haven't heard any damaging revelations about Biden, except for the ones that are made up. Certainly nothing resulting in an indictment.
How many indictments does Trump have now?
How many charges does Biden have?
No, you have it reversed. It's been one-two punch for months.You have it reversed. The right wing media has been pushing their "Hunter Biden" talking points for the last couple of weeks in anticipation of the Jan 6th indictments. It's pathetic how many people fall for this....
What goes around comes around. So when the next damaging information or whistleblower comes out against the Biden family, expect the Georgia indictment.
While I do agree I have to say that he did a lot better than I ever expected and unfortunately in my opinion he’s been the better candidate in supporting the Conservative Party in the last two elections. I remember when it was between him and Clinton I said “great our choice is either satan or the antichrist”.Well since you said it that way, you must also include nominal Christians of all denominations. I don't think he is even nominal. He is a wolf, a tare.
Extenuating circumstances not under one's control don't matter, be it the oil embargo under Carter that caused inflation. Or the pandemic that caused inflation under Biden and the pandemic job loses under Trump.How were his numbers BEFORE a global pandemic?
GDP at purchaser's prices is the sum of gross value added by all resident producers in the economy plus any product taxes and minus any subsidies not included in the value of the products. It is calculated without making deductions for depreciation of fabricated assets or for depletion and...www.macrotrends.net
View attachment 334067
View attachment 334068
View attachment 334069
Again - Trump numbers better than Carter
This never happened.Indictment 1 - Hunter finally admitted laptop was his
All of that is false.which everyone knew and the state media denied, and the government had suppressed all discussion of this story using social media to get Biden elected, a serious constitutional violation, by the way.
What mission is that? The media is not where these cases are tried.Within hours, Bragg indicted Trump in New York, shifting all news coverage of Biden media (all left wing outlets, which is most of them) to Trump. Hours were spent on MSNBC and that ilk, bewailing Trump nonstop. Mission accomplished.
You got a problem with a man having a job?Indictment 2 - It is revealed that Ukraine paid Hunter 5 mil.
All over the coast, eh?Immediately, Trump indicted on Maralago documents. All talk is of Trump and documents (despite Joe Biden having documents all over the east coast and even piled in his garage).
Archer's testimony cleared Biden. Try to keep up.3 Devon Archer testifies that Biden indeed spoke with business partners of Hunter (with Hunter) a large number of times, debunking Joe Biden's frequent comments that he never spoke to his son about business.
I'm unaware of a failed impeachment.Immediately Smith trots out the Jan 6 indictment shifting all talk to Trump again, and away from all the Biden stuff. Mission accomplished to turn the coverage again. (Smith's charges are just a rehash of the failed impeachment but that's another issue).
All this could have been avoided if Trump hadn't committed so many crimes.What goes around comes around. So when the next damaging information or whistleblower comes out against the Biden family, expect the Georgia indictment.
The number are still better under Trump as demonstrated on the graphs -Extenuating circumstances not under one's control don't matter, be it the oil embargo under Carter that caused inflation. Or the pandemic that caused inflation under Biden and the pandemic job loses under Trump.
You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Comer isn't the one shooting indictments out like water from a firehose. Biden's DOJ and associates are, so I think we can tell who is hungry to remove an opponent by whatever means possible, even if that only means tying him up in endless litigation. I think it is going to backfire, but we shall see.LOL. I have no doubt Commer and company are working on their next line of attack. They seem to have a hungry audience.
Yes, it most decidedly DID happen, that Biden's attorney admitted the laptop was his:This never happened.
All of that is false.
What mission is that? The media is not where these cases are tried.
You got a problem with a man having a job?
All over the coast, eh?
Archer's testimony cleared Biden. Try to keep up.
I'm unaware of a failed impeachment.
All this could have been avoided if Trump hadn't committed so many crimes.
A laptop is not information. The information is personal data.“This failed dirty political trick directly resulted in the exposure, exploitation, and manipulation of Mr. Biden’s private and personal information,” Lowell (his own attorney) wrote.
I know. I've read much of it.Archer's testimony transcript has been released now.
So, quoting from Archer's testimony, what did they talk about?It decidedly does not "clear Biden" and no, they were not "talking about the weather" at 20+ phone calls
Q So when you talk about selling the brand --Archer said the "Biden brand” played a significant role in preventing the Burisma Holdings from bankruptcy, and that Joe Biden WAS "the brand",
Never happened. The lawsuit was about the unlawful access to his data, and nowhere did it confirm a laptop.
So you admit the government was not involved. I'm glad that's cleared up.Perhaps you've been out of the news cycle -
YES, it most decidedly DID happen that the laptop story was suppressed in media and on social media:
CNN: Former Twitter executives acknowledged to lawmakers Wednesday that the social media company erred when it temporarily suppressed a New York Post story regarding Hunter Biden’s laptop in October 2020, but the officials emphasized there was no government involvement in the decision.
Yes, and it clears Biden, as we already established.Archer's testimony transcript has been released now.
No, that was the outcome of the Senate trial. Trump was successfully impeached in the House. You need to learn your terminology.There were TWO failed impeachments. "Being Impeached" means "accusation" It is not a determination of guilt, as the average lay person misunderstands it to be. Impeachment is only to be used for those who commit "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors," requires a majority vote by the House of Representatives, and then conviction by a two-thirds vote in the Senate.
What was the outcome of both Trump Impeachments? Acquittal, both times.
I never claimed otherwise.You also seem unaware that there is a presumption of innocence in U.S. law. Innocent until proven guilty.
See above. You didn't even bother to read Hunter's lawsuit before making false claims about a laptop. You also misunderstand what impeachment is. You also failed to understand the nature of Archer's testimony.You may wish to acquaint yourself with this information and these legal principles before commenting on topics on which you are unclear.
Biden's information: It is an admission.A laptop is not information. The information is personal data.
I know. I've read much of it.
So, quoting from Archer's testimony, what did they talk about?
Q So when you talk about selling the brand --
Q -- it's not about selling access to his father. It's about selling the illusion of access to his father. Is that fair?
A Is that fair? I mean, yeah, that is -- I think that's -- that's almost fair. Almost fair.
Q Almost Fair? Why almost fair?
A Because there -- there is -- there are touch points and contact points that I
can't deny that happened, but nothing of material was discussed.
The laptop was confirmed as Biden's by his own attorney. End of story.Never happened. The lawsuit was about the unlawful access to his data, and nowhere did it confirm a laptop.
So you admit the government was not involved. I'm glad that's cleared up.
Yes, and it clears Biden, as we already established.
No, that was the outcome of the Senate trial. Trump was successfully impeached in the House. You need to learn your terminology.
I never claimed otherwise.
See above. You didn't even bother to read Hunter's lawsuit before making false claims about a laptop. You also misunderstand what impeachment is. You also failed to understand the nature of Archer's testimony.
You're lying. Maybe you should read the lawsuit.The laptop was confirmed as Biden's by his own attorney.
Perhaps you should review what an impeachment is versus a Senate trial.Trump was acquitted in BOTH impeachments. Perhaps you should review the actual facts.
All of that is false. Archer's testimony cleared Joe Biden. There are no bank records showing he received bribes.Biden is NOT cleared, by any means. Archer merely refuted the lies that Biden knew nothing of Hunter's business or partners, after it came out that he was in dozens of phone calls with foreign business partners of his middle-aged son. Financial records, Suspicious banking reports, 20 shell companies connected with the family, dumping money into family members' accounts. This is only getting started.