I don't think this is necessarily updated. But if you do the research you can find more (I count six and I am sure there has been more since this article). See here is the rub, you can party in your head about how Trump only won one.
It does not matter as they have all failed. And, as opposed to the claims of the article title you posted, the evidence was examined and even argued. We have clips of Trump lawyers if various courtrooms stating that they were not alleging any fraud occurred. We have rulings that show why cases were dismissed, how the "evidence" submitted to the court did not show that election law was broken, in fact, in many cases it shows how election policy was followed, just that the affidavits were from people that did not understand election law or procedure.
Yet completely dismiss (as an American) how much the army of lawyers sent to change COVID election laws to stray outside of constitutional boundaries prior to election day,
Oh, you mean like Texas? Texas was one of those states where the governor used emergency powers to "mandate" some changes to the election. Oddly, no one from the Trump side ever mentions how Texas "illegally" changed the rules. Instead, in a form of irony, Texas instead sued other states for "illegally" changing the rules -- apparently not understanding that people in glass houses shouldn't through stones.
Also, the Texas case properly lost. Now, had it gotten that far, the Texas case would have failed on the merits (as Scalia and Thomas, who believed the Texas case should have been heard, still stated it would have failed anyway on the merits in their opinion). But, the simple fact is, Texas has no right to sue another state over violation of another state's laws. It would be about like California suing Texas for not following California power laws; I don't many people, from either side of the aisle, think states should be able to sue other states because they do not like the other state's laws, or that they aren't applying them "correctly."
see multiple states stop counting,
I'm sorry, this didn't happen. There were some precincts in various states that quit counting for the night (particularly rural counties), and in Atlanta they had expected to stop counting in Fulton County, when they decided they should continue counting. Some of it also based on the misunderstanding that counts aren't updated per vote. Instead, the counters do a batch of votes and, as they complete that batch, they update the count -- so it sometimes makes it appear that they "paused," when instead they were merely processing that batch (which often took a few hours, depending on the size of that batch).
and even notice on many clips how the counters changed and flip on live TV,
Not many. There were a couple of cases where there were arithmetic or they applied votes to the wrong candidate -- not often and they were quickly corrected.
and read THIS ARTICLE and walk away thinking the movie "Idiocracy" did not just happen upon America. And that is not going to help when reality comes crashing down around you.
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Accurate List of 2020 Election Fraud Cases Shows 81 Cases Total, 30 Still Active - And NOT ONE SINGLE COURT Has Allowed Evidence to be Argued
THIS ARTICLE
https://bit.ly/3frdvX7
The "Idiocracy" is those that believe the lies of those supporting Trump; though it tends to be more like trusting the wrong sources and being gullible -- though I suppose might think that makes for an idiot. It is interesting to note, Donald Trump has basically stated that anything he's "lost" is due to corruption and fraud. When he did not win the Emmy for the Apprentice, he claimed it was the corruption of the Hollywood voters. When he lost in Iowa to Ted Cruze in the 2016 primaries, he claimed there was fraud. In the 2018 election he claimed there was fraud. Again, every time he (or his side) does not win.
It is worth noting Trump was the President. If he really thought our election systems were that corrupt, why did he not fix them in 2016 (when he claimed there was fraud in the primaries he lost)? Why didn't he in 2018, when he claimed it was fraud that gave Democrats back the House? Yet in 2020, despite being President and having power to try and "fix" the voting systems, as well as claiming, months before, that if he lost it would be by fraud, why did he not fix the voting systems; or at least work with law enforcement to make sure they could catch those committing fraud, he did nothing.
Instead, he complained about the "fraud." Pres. Trump had a part of his administration, under Homeland Security, who were specifically to ensure that the election was safe and fair -- and they said the "2020 election was most secure in US history." Pres. Trump directed AG Barr to investigate, to find fraud in the election. AG Barr stated that they could find no real fraud. So, as this OP alleges, Trump then tried to get the acting-AG, the one that replaced Barr (because Barr would not back the fraud claims) to state there was fraud, and this AG also stated he did not see evidence of fraud; despite the DoJ and FBI having been investigating the various fraud claims for two months. There is no actual evidence of major fraud, nothing close that would change election results. This has been confirmed multiple times, including by Trump's own Justice Department, Trump's Homeland Security, and the courts.
