Trump Admin: publicly funded group can discriminate against Jews & gays

[YeshuaFan]

That's fine, but keep in mind that it is a part of your religious belief, not an objective fact which everyone must acknowledge.

Since God sees all of us as being human in the womb, would that not make it objective truth?

 

[Speedwell]

Since God sees all of us as being human in the womb, would that not make it objective truth?

According to your religion; nobody else is required to acknowledge it.

 

[RestoreTheJoy]

That's fine, but keep in mind that it is a part of your religious belief, not an objective fact which everyone must acknowledge.

Oh, it is an objective fact that it is a baby. It's not a puppy or a plant or a rock. It's a baby that you can see clearly is a baby, with all the new ultrasound technology. We have merely chosen to redefine it and deny it personhood for political purposes.

 

[RestoreTheJoy]

No, that is not their mission. Hyperbole does not enhance your position



It's not a comparison it is pointing out the flaw in your reasoning. The reason no court has ruled against religious institutions receiving public funding is that the whole idea you espouse of any money going to an institution means you are funding everything they do has been thoroughly rejected. It is not a reasonable position. Does that explain it in a more clear fashion?

Of course it is the mission. It is the largest single provider of abortions in this country. The President, Dr. Leana Wen, of Planned Parenthood admits that abortion is the purpose.

Leana Wen, M.D. on Twitter

And we all know the eugenics background of Margaret Sanger.

 

[YeshuaFan]

According to your religion; nobody else is required to acknowledge it.

God is Supreme Being, ALL should acknowledge it!

 

[YeshuaFan]

Of course it is the mission. It is the largest single provider of abortions in this country. The President, Dr. Leana Wen, of Planned Parenthood admits that abortion is the purpose.

Leana Wen, M.D. on Twitter

And we all know the eugenics background of Margaret Sanger.

IF she would had gotten her way, there would be no Blacks left alive on earth....

 

[Speedwell]

Oh, it is an objective fact that it is a baby. It's not a puppy or a plant or a rock. It's a baby that you can see clearly is a baby, with all the new ultrasound technology. We have merely chosen to redefine it and deny it personhood for political purposes.

For a long time in the early stages of pregnancy, no, it does not look like a "baby." But that is beside the point. As a matter of fact, many people sincerely do not believe it is a "baby." Denouncing them as wicked for not agreeing with you about it is not, shall we say, "evangelistic." Do you want to convert them to your view or just wallow in moral superiority?

 

[YeshuaFan]

For a long time in the early stages of pregnancy, no, it does not look like a "baby." But that is beside the point. As a matter of fact, many people sincerely do not believe it is a "baby." Denouncing them as wicked for not agreeing with you about it is not, shall we say, "evangelistic." Do you want to convert them to your view or just wallow in moral superiority?

We do agree with God that all human life is sacred and is His gift!

 

[Belk]

Of course it is the mission. It is the largest single provider of abortions in this country. The President, Dr. Leana Wen, of Planned Parenthood admits that abortion is the purpose.

Leana Wen, M.D. on Twitter

And we all know the eugenics background of Margaret Sanger.

Are you going to respond to the other point? The one about funding?

 

[ToddNotTodd]

We do agree with God that all human life is sacred and is His gift!

No, no we don’t...

 

[RestoreTheJoy]

For a long time in the early stages of pregnancy, no, it does not look like a "baby." But that is beside the point. As a matter of fact, many people sincerely do not believe it is a "baby." Denouncing them as wicked for not agreeing with you about it is not, shall we say, "evangelistic." Do you want to convert them to your view or just wallow in moral superiority?

But it IS indeed a baby. Whatever fantasy some people feed themselves in order to excuse what they want to do is not factual. In reality, it is indeed a baby.

 

[Speedwell]

But it IS indeed a baby. Whatever fantasy some people feed themselves in order to excuse what they want to do is not factual. In reality, it is indeed a baby.

But you're not going to try to convince anybody else of that, just condemn them for not agreeing with you automatically, right?

 

[YeshuaFan]

But you're not going to try to convince anybody else of that, just condemn them for not agreeing with you automatically, right?

Was Jesus a Human being while in the womb, John the Baptist, Paul? David? As God called them all by name to His work!

 

[Speedwell]

Was Jesus a Human being while in the womb, John the Baptist, Paul? David? As God called them all by name to His work!

According to your religion, yes.

 

[LoAmmi]

Was Jesus a Human being while in the womb, John the Baptist, Paul? David? As God called them all by name to His work!

Was David's son who G-d killed in the womb as punishment also a human being?

 

[Shiloh Raven]

Edit

 

[YeshuaFan]

No, no we don’t...

Was Jesus a human while inside womb of Mary?

 

[Belk]

Was Issac a human when God ordered Abraham to sacrifice him?

 

[YeshuaFan]

According to your religion, yes.

According to God also, as God by the Holy Spirit conceived the Son of God in womb of Mary!

 

[YeshuaFan]

Was Issac a human when God ordered Abraham to sacrifice him?

Yes, and God did that to make sure Abraham realized that love towards God was first priority....