Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What you are advocating is NOT consistent! Jesus prayed that the disciples be one, among themselves, as Jesus was one with the father. And we know that did not happen during the lifetime of the disciples
Yes, mangling is the right word! John very clearly said that the Logos was God and that the Logos acting on himself became flesh and we beheld his glory as the only begotten of the father. Plus there are a total of, at least, 97 vss. which address or refer to Jesus as YHWH, or Theos, God.
It is only confusion when people like you deliberately distort and mangle the scripture, then complain that their distortion is confusion. I notice that you have not addressed the rest of my post.
Der Alter said:What you are advocating is NOT consistent! Jesus prayed that the disciples be one, among themselves, as Jesus was one with the father. And we know that did not happen during the lifetime of the disciples
I'm being very consistent. Please by all means show my inconsistency.
Do you believe that Jesus is claiming to be God in John 10:30? Yes or no?
Are we going to be consistent throughout the text and say that Jesus was asking the Heavenly Father that we believers might become God?
Do you know why John wrote his gospel?
What is your problem with my original post?What you don't agree with how I described your understanding that, "In the beginning God was with God and God was God!?"
As a trinitarian don't you believe that God gave God authority? As weird as it sounds.
The final defense of the doctrine of the Trinity is that it is a mystery. That confirms that it is unintelligible.
I explained this in the post you quoted, which I have included above.
That is about like me asking you if you have stopped beating your wife, and wearing women's underwear, yes or no?
I believe that the Jews were correct.
Joh 10:33[/B] The Jews answered him, "It is not for a good work that we are going to stone you but for blasphemy, because you, being a man, make yourself God."Then you are going to post the standard anti-Trinitarian argument about vss. 34 and 35 and misquote Jesus while doing so.
Methodius Oration on the Psalms [3d century]
VII. Let us look also at what follows. What says the most divine evangelist? When the Lord had entered into the temple, the blind and the lame came to Him; and He healed them. And when the chief priests and Pharisees saw the wonderful things that He did, and the children crying, and saying, Hosanna to the Son of David: Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord,51 they brooked not this honour that was paid Him, and therefore they came to Him, and thus spake, Hearest Thou not what these say? As if they said, Art Thou not grieved at hearing from these innocents things which befit God, and God alone? Has not God of old made it manifest by the prophet, "My glory will I not give unto another; "52 and how dost Thou, being a man, make Thyself God?53 But what to this answers the long-suffering One, He who is abundant in mercy,54 and slow to wrath?55 He bears with these frenzied ones; with an apology He keeps their wrath in check; in His turn He calls the Scriptures to their remembrance; He brings forward testimony to what is done, and shrinks not from inquiry. Wherefore He says, Have ye never heard Me saying by the prophet, Then shall ye know that I am He that doth speak?56 nor again, Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings hast Thou perfected praise because of Thine enemies, that Thou mightest still the enemy and the avenger? Which without doubt are ye, who give heed unto the law, and read the prophets, while yet ye despise Me who, both by the law and the prophets, have been beforehand proclaimed. Ye think, indeed, under a pretence of piety, to avenge the glory of God, not understanding that he that despiseth Me despiseth My Father also.57 I came forth from God, and am come into the world,58 and My glory is the glory of My Father also. Even thus these foolish ones, being convinced by our Saviour-God, ceased to answer Him again, the truth stopping their mouths; but adopting a new and foolish device, they took counsel against Him.
i've always understood that to be a relational, rather than ontological unity. we can see how close, personally, Christ was to His Father in heaven. One with Him in will and purpose, too. it's a relational unity, a closeness, Christians share with the Father too, in and through and because of Christ alone. we will still sin and rebell, because we're human. but that inner, personal, day by day relationship with God is there, because of Christ.
we can not ontologically become God, but as Father and Son are One relationally, we can partake in that, too.
Very well. How exactly is Jesus one with the Father? In what way are they one?
Irrelevant! Is that the only vs. in your Bible? Please do show me where John told any of the other disciples, or any other person, to not do or say anything which differed from John's purpose?
You are presuming to read my mind about what I understand. Can you show any scripture which states "In the beginning God was with God and God was God?" If not then you are deliberately misrepresenting scripture and the Trinity.
Can you cite any scripture which states "God gave God authority?"You are misunderstanding me. I'll try again. I can't cite that exact quote, but that was not my intention anyway. I'm trying to illustrate to you that God gave Jesus authority as stated in Scripture:
8And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth." Matt 28:18 KJV
And since you believe that Jesus is God then the above passage can be understood as God giving God authority. Understand?
There are many mysteries in the Bible. Where is it written that finite man will have a complete, total understanding of the infinite God? In fact scripture says exactly the opposite.
Sure as far as things that are not explained or explainable they are mysteries.
The trinity can't be three distinctions of God for a few reasons. Firstly, which Bible verses can be used that are not insertions? Secondly, why did Jesus while on earth repeatedly pass on praise to himself and give it to God? Why did he pray to God as often as he did, when in actuality he was praying to himself, as the trinity theory would have us understand. Why did he come to earth at all, if he were God, the issues at stake could of been resolved from heaven, could it not?
The reasons for Jesus coming to earth to do the things he did are being forgotton. And yet these reasons and their implications are potentially life-saving. People can get bogged down in theology, and forget that the truth of the Bible is actually quite simple and summed up in John 17:3.
Very well. How exactly is Jesus one with the Father? In what way are they one?
Huh??? What are you talking about? I asked a normal straightforward question. You are ignoring context to get your interpretation.
Context is not only the immediately surrounding text, but can also be referred to in other parts of the book as well. And looking at John 17:21-23 it helps us see the proper context of this statement, "I and the Father are one."
Sure we have a man who goes around forgiving peoples sins and miraculously curing them of their infirmities. The unbelieving Jews were blind to the fact that Jesus was sent from God as Messiah. They didn't understand that this man, Jesus of Nazareth, was given all authority from God over mankind. They didn't understand that he was the Son of God. So naturally the Jews wanting swift action against Jesus accuse him of making himself out to be God. Jesus never claimed to be God. He just spoke the Wisdom of God. Thus, one can see why Jesus may have been mistakenly perceived to be pretending to be God.
Trust me if Jesus was God then John would have made that abundantly clear. Instead, what John makes clear is that Jesus is a man.
It is argued by trinitarians that John wrote his gospel to prove that Jesus is God despite what John himself wrote here:
You believe Jesus Christ is the Logos and you believe that Jesus Christ is God. So all I did was replace those terms with the word God. After all they are synonymous according to trinitarians.
DA said:Can you cite any scripture which states "God gave God authority?"
You are misunderstanding me. I'll try again. I can't cite that exact quote, but that was not my intention anyway. I'm trying to illustrate to you that God gave Jesus authority as stated in Scripture:
And since you believe that Jesus is God then the above passage can be understood as God giving God authority. Understand?
Sure as far as things that are not explained or explainable they are mysteries.
Trust me if Jesus was God then John would have made that abundantly clear. Instead, what John makes clear is that Jesus is a man.[ . . . ]
look guys we all know that in the bible it talks about God the father, God the Son and the Holy Spirit or Spirit of God. Most people who refer to the "Trinity" are simply putting them on the same page. We know that they are different from one another but somehow connected. It doesnt really matter how you look at it as long as you are aware of all of them, respecting each part and the role they play.
Here is something for everyone to ponder on. When he was in the Garden of Gestheneme Jesus was praying intensely. Who was he praying to? Some supporters of the trinity theory state Jesus was God and man at the same time. This idea is not supported by the Bible. Further if true, it makes a nonsense of what Jesus was saying to his Father, and added to this it makes no sense that an angel should be sent to him to strengthen him. Why would an angel be sent to strengthen God? Why does God need an angel to help him? Further, when being arrested, he told Peter he could if he wished entreat his Father to sent legions of angels to his aid? Why entreat his Father if he was God already? The clear indication of all these things and many more from the Bible is that Jesus was and still is, inferior to someone else.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?