- Jun 9, 2021
- 372
- 47
- 50
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Single
To consciously and purposefully inflict needless harm upon a human being is evil and immoral
Every human being on the face of the earth, minus the odd sociopath, adheres, with allowances for minor deviation in language, to this same standard
The God of the bible, unfortunately, does NOT adhere to this standard!
Example:
God chose to consciously and purposefully drown innocent babies, alongside the wicked, during the Great Flood
{i.e. God NEEDLESSLY inflicted harm upon those babies!!}
That said, I'm perfectly willing to accept that God might have had a morally valid reason for consciously and purposefully inflicting the harm of drowning upon those innocent babies
In other words, I'm perfectly willing to accept that the drowning of those babies was, after all, not even needless to begin with...
Assuming this is true - assuming that God NEEDED, after all, to drown those babies - my question is this:
Doesn't He {God} owe it to us to offer His explanation for having inflicted what seemingly appears {to us} to be a NEEDLESS harm?
Isn't this just common sense?
If you love someone and you truly desire for this someone to fully trust in and love you in return - don't you present yourself with full transparency?
Don't you at least make an effort?
Every human being on the face of the earth, minus the odd sociopath, adheres, with allowances for minor deviation in language, to this same standard
The God of the bible, unfortunately, does NOT adhere to this standard!
Example:
God chose to consciously and purposefully drown innocent babies, alongside the wicked, during the Great Flood
{i.e. God NEEDLESSLY inflicted harm upon those babies!!}
That said, I'm perfectly willing to accept that God might have had a morally valid reason for consciously and purposefully inflicting the harm of drowning upon those innocent babies
In other words, I'm perfectly willing to accept that the drowning of those babies was, after all, not even needless to begin with...
Assuming this is true - assuming that God NEEDED, after all, to drown those babies - my question is this:
Doesn't He {God} owe it to us to offer His explanation for having inflicted what seemingly appears {to us} to be a NEEDLESS harm?
Isn't this just common sense?
If you love someone and you truly desire for this someone to fully trust in and love you in return - don't you present yourself with full transparency?
Don't you at least make an effort?