Does anyone else get the impression that many people's working definition of traditional is whatever the Church did in the 1950's?
Oh, I see what you're getting at. Hailing the 50s as the hey-day of Catholicism is a bit myopic. I'm a gothic architecture and Gregorian chant fan, myself. Not so much a fan of every aspect of medieval and early modern Catholicism, though.There is nothing wrong with emphasizing Catholic identity, especially when it is done to reinforce a theological point. The problem is when the expression of Catholicism of a particular era is taken as the pinnacle of Catholic identity and anything that deviates from it are seen as dangerous innovations even if they draw upon ancient traditions that had fallen out of favor during that particular era.
Oh, I see what you're getting at. Hailing the 50s as the hey-day of Catholicism is a bit myopic. I'm a gothic architecture and Gregorian chant fan, myself. Not so much a fan of every aspect of medieval and early modern Catholicism, though.