- Jun 18, 2011
- 11,954
- 3,864
- 48
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Others
What so you think? (bad Russian accent in mind)
Minority Leader Pelosi Confident Support Caucus, Jun 22 2017 | Video | C-SPAN.org
THIS IS NOT A POST CONCERNING Q OR ANY OF THEIR ARGUMENTS. ALL THEORIES CONCERNING Q ARE NOT UP FOR DISCUSSION AND WILL BE REMOVED.
***The original clipped video I posted was from a Q post. I do not follow Q so I was unaware, and this thread was rightfully closed per site rules. I presented my argument as a standalone conversation apart from, and independent of Q. So it was decide to allow me to post. Thank you to the CF mods and administrators for taking the time to speak to me, and for correcting my mistake.***
The subject matter at hand can be found at 26:52 in this full C-span video.
My argument is: I don't really think it matters whether we are talking Democrat or Republican. This is what is important about this clip. Here we have a Senator describing a well known, and self described "political tactic" that she refers to as being 'known'as "The wrap-up Smear." (She states this in the air of it is common knowledge among her colleagues.) In which a false narrative is given to the media, and reported on as fact to hold up the narrative of the person who created it. This tactic is straight from Joseph Goebbels mouth; who is considered to be the greatest propagandist in history, while he served as minister of propaganda for the German Third Reich under Adolf Hitler.
This plays to every doubt that any person has had concerning the truthfulness of the media, and calls into question every sensational story that was not wholly believed by the public. Including the entire fake news fight during the Trump administration.
This has been the crux of the disbelief of media from the onset of the Trump election. I want to hear from her own mouth whether or not it is a common enough practice that not only has she heard of it, but has a working understanding of how it is utilized. Because up to now it was just conjecture. This may prove that media is openly gaming the system, and members of the senate/congress know how to use it.
Sure would explain a lot.
This clip just revoked everyone's 'conspiracy theory card'.
This woman's statement provides reasonable suspicion of media propagandization conducted by our government to influence the populace. Which leads to a system within the media to receive leaks/propaganda. Never heard of gov operatives in the media? Someone has to be available to take the information/leaks and put them in the news. This begs the question: Who is conducting the leaks? And so on....
Minority Leader Pelosi Confident Support Caucus, Jun 22 2017 | Video | C-SPAN.org
THIS IS NOT A POST CONCERNING Q OR ANY OF THEIR ARGUMENTS. ALL THEORIES CONCERNING Q ARE NOT UP FOR DISCUSSION AND WILL BE REMOVED.
***The original clipped video I posted was from a Q post. I do not follow Q so I was unaware, and this thread was rightfully closed per site rules. I presented my argument as a standalone conversation apart from, and independent of Q. So it was decide to allow me to post. Thank you to the CF mods and administrators for taking the time to speak to me, and for correcting my mistake.***
The subject matter at hand can be found at 26:52 in this full C-span video.
My argument is: I don't really think it matters whether we are talking Democrat or Republican. This is what is important about this clip. Here we have a Senator describing a well known, and self described "political tactic" that she refers to as being 'known'as "The wrap-up Smear." (She states this in the air of it is common knowledge among her colleagues.) In which a false narrative is given to the media, and reported on as fact to hold up the narrative of the person who created it. This tactic is straight from Joseph Goebbels mouth; who is considered to be the greatest propagandist in history, while he served as minister of propaganda for the German Third Reich under Adolf Hitler.
This plays to every doubt that any person has had concerning the truthfulness of the media, and calls into question every sensational story that was not wholly believed by the public. Including the entire fake news fight during the Trump administration.
This has been the crux of the disbelief of media from the onset of the Trump election. I want to hear from her own mouth whether or not it is a common enough practice that not only has she heard of it, but has a working understanding of how it is utilized. Because up to now it was just conjecture. This may prove that media is openly gaming the system, and members of the senate/congress know how to use it.
Sure would explain a lot.
This clip just revoked everyone's 'conspiracy theory card'.
This woman's statement provides reasonable suspicion of media propagandization conducted by our government to influence the populace. Which leads to a system within the media to receive leaks/propaganda. Never heard of gov operatives in the media? Someone has to be available to take the information/leaks and put them in the news. This begs the question: Who is conducting the leaks? And so on....
Last edited: