Hitler the 8th head of the beast is dead, but antisemitism lives on. Plus the 7th head of the beast lives on in the demon-possessed kings of the east who start the Battle of Ar Mageddon.
Upvote
0
I agree with you concerning Hitler; but I don't know how you can have a "7th head" without the ten horns. How do you manage that?Hitler the 8th head of the beast is dead, but antisemitism lives on. Plus the 7th head of the beast lives on in the demon-possessed kings of the east who start the Battle of Ar Mageddon.
The ten horns are the ten nations that were aligned with Hitler.I agree with you concerning Hitler; but I don't know how you can have a "7th head" without the ten horns. How do you manage that?
BTW, my news item for the day: Two seemingly contradictory reports:
1. "'PM needs to ensure he can trust Obama on Iranian threat'"
-- Israel News | Online Israeli News Covering Israel & The Jewish World - JPost
2. "Western optimism on Irans nuclear program comes from three major US concessions in Kazakhstan to which Israel strongly objects: Fordo stays open, 20-percent uranium enrichment continues and low-grade Iranian uranium stocks will not leave the country. One Israeli official summed this up for debkafile as a huge Iranian success and total defeat for Israel. "
-- DEBKAfile, Political Analysis, Espionage, Terrorism, Security
More: Obamaâs Israel visit is on - to sweeten pill of nuclear Iran
I believe DEBKA, which continues,
"Significantly, former Military Intelligence chief Amos Yadlin commented that an Israeli strike against Irans nuclear facilities would be a one-night operation."
There is also talk about whether or not Netanyahu will be able to form a coalition government. I strongly believe he will.
I don't see any other real news today. This is interesting:
"Poll of Americans: Favorable view of Israel 66% PA 15% "
-- IMRA - Friday, March 8, 2013 Poll of Americans: Favorable view of Israel 66% PA 15%
Here's some more of the poll:
#1 Total favorable
#2 Total unfavorable
#1 #2
91% 5% Canada
88% 8% Great Britain
85% 10% Germany
81% 15% Japan
73% 22% France
68% 23% India
66% 29% Israel
Shalom shalom
ISRAEL STARTS WORLD WAR III!!!
Well, it didn't actually happen. I was just joking, referring to some who got excited last summer, when many thought Israel was about to attack Iran and knock out its nuclear weapons production facilities. The actual news is this:
SUBJECT: N Korea threat all-out war rattles China
FULL TEXT: A fragile peace that has existed in the Korean peninsula for nearly 60 years looked under threat today as North Korea scrapped all non-aggression pacts with the South and said it was ready for all-out war...
"In that spirit, General Kang Pyo-yong, deputy Defence Minister and probably the Norths most influential commander, declared the Norths intercontinental ballistic missiles and other missiles are on standby with miniaturised warheads able to turn Washington into a sea of fire. The KNCA fanned the flames, saying a nuclear war may break out right now....
-- IMRA - Saturday, March 9, 2013 Excerpts: Port Said developments. NKorea threat all-out war rattles China, Egypt beware of jihadist Sinai attack March 09, 2013
It's ironic that when a third party even HINTS that Israel MIGHT take some action that COULD cause trouble (trouble far short of nuclear war, at that), the reading public has apoplexy; but when North Korea bluntly states that it is in the process of initiating a nuclear war, hardly anyone takes them seriously.
I might add that what is happening in Korea bears heavily on what happens in the Middle East and Israel. In fact, because North Korea is collaborating with Iran in developing nuclear weapons and launch systems, that very nuclear threat from Iran, that Israel is compelled to either address or abdicate its own existence, will be rooted in how seriously the world powers deal with the threat from Korea.
It's in God's hands; but I guaranty this: God will severely judge any nation that works against Israel's vital interests -- either by action or by inaction.
Shalom shalom
Source?North Korea and Iran are not close allies at all. Sure, they both hate the West, but they are very different. Iran is very much more sane than North Korea, and would ever hate to be in North Korea's isolated position. North Korea seems to be a bigger threat to world peace than Iran.
Hi, Supreme.North Korea and Iran are not close allies at all. Sure, they both hate the West, but they are very different. Iran is very much more sane than North Korea, and would ever hate to be in North Korea's isolated position. North Korea seems to be a bigger threat to world peace than Iran.
Hi, Zaz. I agree with you, in those areas that I can verify. As for how virtually all Muslim leaders wanting to be the one to be seen as defeating Israel, I don't know. What amazes me, is that countries across the globe which have virtually no connection with Israel, places like Swaziland, Uruguay and China, are in lock step in the UN, in voting for resolution after resolution condemning Israel for things that in most countries don't even make the news
I believe "The Controversy of Zion" is what we are talking about, with all this condemnation around the world against Zionism. The thing that is offensive to the Chinese, to the Zimbabweans and to the Jamaicans alike, is not that the Jews should be granted a homeland, though that would probably be sufficient to incite many. It is their return to Zion, according to Biblical prophecy, that has every devil and every world leader losing sleep. They know that if God's word concerning the Jewish people is still active and powerful after 2,000 and 3,000 years, they need to fear the reach of the King of the Universe.
Despite Supreme's insistence that those folks are just "saying stupid things", those leaders are not stupid; they fear something very real, and are warring against it; and the time is fast approaching, that they will convert their words into deadly action. And the vultures will indeed gather. The "Marriage Supper of the Lamb" will come, and the birds of the air will eat the flesh of kings, and of the mighty of the earth.
Hi, Zazal.P. S. I'm curious about your "vultures" quote. Isaiah 34 comes to mind:
Simply saying that those that hate Israel usually turn up to see whats up for grabs...like vultures.
Originally Posted by BlandOatmeal DEMOGRAPHIC TIME BOMB AGAINST THE MUSLIM WORLD -- AND ALL OF US
An article by David Ignatius in the February 11, 2013 Web edition of Ya Libnan talks about a demographic nightmare hitting the Arab world in this generation, brought on by sharply dropping birth rates.
"...What’s “astonishing,” says Eberstadt in an email explaining his findings, is that in the Arab world, this move away from marriage “is by many measures already as far along as was Europe’s in the 1980s — and it is taking place at a vastly lower level of development than the corresponding flights in Europe and developed East Asia.”
"“Something really big is under way — and practically no one has noticed it, even in the Arab world,” argues Eberstadt.
"These studies are a reminder that the big demographic trends shaping the world are mysterious, and often overlooked. The Arab world may be experiencing a youth bulge now, fueling popular uprisings in Tunisia, Egypt and elsewhere. But as Eberstadt notes, what’s ahead over the next generation will probably be declines in the number of working-age adults and rapidly aging populations.'''"
Sharp decline in Muslim fertility rates | Ya Libnan | World News Live from Lebanon...Hi, MarshI was wondering if this article would get your attention. This is a topic that will come up again in the years to come.
I was wondering if you're still on board. It happens that I was just surfing Ya Libnan again tonight, and came across the original article again.
It occurred to me, that sharply declining fertility rates are a rough measure of a society in terminal decline. In nature, populations tend to increase exponentially in times of tremendous prosperity, like locusts in a rainy year following a period of severe drought. Then the party ends, as it were, and mass starvation/ war/ disease ensues. If this sounds a lot like end-times Bible prophecy, chalk it up to coincidence; because there is a perfectly normal reason for those three to happen together:
1. When the population-to-resources ratio hits a crisis level, people begin to grow hungry, then to starve.
2. When hunger, or the threat of it, sets in, stronger countries turn to war to ensure their share of the goods
3. With war and destruction, infrastructure and medical care collapse, and plagues set in. People weakened by hunger, of course, are the most susceptible.
Locusts naturally go into boom-bust cycles when these things happen, because theirs is a pre-programmed genetic response. With humans, who can forsee far in to the future, the "boom-bust" cycle can take on a different form: namely, sharply declining fertility and growth rates. The Ya Libnan article focussed on the current sharp decline in the Muslim world (with an incidental mention of Mexico). Let me look up what happened in the industrialized West, for comparison:
I was hoping for a map that would show the astounding growth in population of the industrialized world, particularly the US, during the 1800s -- as that part of the world became industrialized -- then tapered off and declined during the 20th century. There are many technical explanations for this, but the simplest is the Biblical maxim:
Ecclesiastes 5
[11] When goods increase, they are increased that eat them: and what good is there to the owners thereof, saving the beholding of them with their eyes?
As it is, I found a chart that shows a shorter time span. If you look at Germany, in particular, you will see something strange: During 1937, Germany and Sweden had the same fertility rates as one another. Then Germany's rate sharply fell from 2.1 to 1.5. Some 10 million Germans died in the war during that period, mostly men; so the number of mouths had sharply declined, even without the fertility decrease. At the same time, Germany prospered through territorial expansion during the war and rapidly rebuilt after the war, so goods were steadily increasing.
Judging by the Preacher's maxim, Germany's fertility rate should have increased after the war (as it did after WWI); but it didn't. Germans stopped having children. France and Denmark fell in fertility during the war too, but significantly recovered in the late 1940s; but Austria and Germany just kept sliding downhill (Spain did even worse, under Franco; and they still haven't recovered).
I think something psychological is at work here, perhaps a "loser's syndrome". Here's another map, including the former Soviet Bloc:
SRC for images: http://demographymatters.blogspot.com/2007/05/childbearing-in-europe.html
For the ex-Commies, the rubber band seems to have snapped in the 1990s. Russia even had an uptick in while the Soviet Union collapsed. Maybe they were driven by HOPE of better times. Then they began skidding in earnest, while newly-unified Western Europe started leveling off.
These are self-destructive trends. The Ya Libnan article correctly sounds the alarm that these figures signal impending demographic disaster; so there is no reasonable economic reason I can see: The cause seems to be psychological. It reminds me of comments I have read about Native Americans, saying that when a tribe shrinks down to a certain size, its members lose their will to continue as a people, and they stop having children.
The rapid drop in fertility rates mentioned in the article (70% decline in 30 years, in the case of Iran since the Revolution) make me think that somehow those people see that their glory is past, despite the boastings of their leaders -- just as happened to the Germans and Austrians under Hitler, the Spanish under Franco and the East Europeans after the fall of Communism. In a sense, they've already lost, and are living in denial.
Just a thought.