No, Paul said last trump not 7th trump. It is you who is interpreting the last trump Paul spoke of as being the 7th trumpet of Revelation 10 and 11.He did. The 7th trump is the last of 7 trumps.
The trumpet themselves are not a woe. The 5th trumpet announced the flesh tormenting locust - that was the first woe.The third woe is the 7th trumpet. The first woe is the 5th trump, 2nd woe is the 6th trump.
The trumpets signal WHEN John is about to be informed of what the woe(s) are. Not that the trumpet of the three angels are the woes, themselves.Rev_8:13 And I beheld, and heard an angel flying through the midst of heaven, saying with a loud voice, Woe, woe, woe, to the inhabiters of the earth by reason of the other voices of the trumpet of the three angels, which are yet to sound!
Three woes, 3 angels yet to sound their trumps.
Another thought came to mind. The two individuals (maybe Enoch and Elijah) will be murdered and lay in the street, then resurrected and will ascend after the 3rd day. It stands to reason, that prior to this event, our resurrection/rapture has not taken place.
Now, since the candlesticks represent the faithful and persecuted churches, they will also simultaneously be taken up with the two witnesses --- just a thought, not sure.
Rev. 7:9 represents the rapture, the multitude from every nation seen in heaven.
Another interesting point is that Revelation is not in a chronological order, events overlap and are shown in different vantage points.
It goes back and forth which is why this book is so confusing -- it can't work in a linear, chapter by chapter, seals, then trumpets, etc. The trumpets and bowls fall within the seals.
I think of the scroll with seals as a play and that Jesus arrived in heaven after His ascension and was handed that scroll at that time and opened it. It contains the events of the future, but the play doesn't start until the trumpets start to blow. And then you have 1,2,3 ... in order and then the bowls in order.
Why should it matter when Jesus said these things?
I was just thinking about the two witnesses and who they may be but i have a few question what are they a witness of? Whats thier testimony? And what does it mean they stand before the Lord of the earth? Etc.
(Revelation 11:3) There is no change in context from the previous passage about the temple. Since the temple was destroyed by the Romans in 70 A.D. the two witnesses appeared at or before the start of the Jewish War (66–70 A.D.) There was a Jewish king and a Jewish priest during this time that match the description rather well.I was just thinking about the two witnesses and who they may be but i have a few question what are they a witness of? Whats thier testimony? And what does it mean they stand before the Lord of the earth? Etc.
Since the temple was destroyed by the Romans in 70 A.D. the two witnesses appeared at or before the start of the Jewish War (66–70 A.D.) There was a Jewish king and a Jewish priest during this time that match the description rather well.
I was just thinking about the two witnesses and who they may be but i have a few question what are they a witness of? Whats thier testimony? And what does it mean they stand before the Lord of the earth? Etc.