I heard an argument from a trans activist the other day that I thought was particularly interesting. Before I get to that, I'm aware that the vast majority of those who support trans activism do so as an issue of "harm reduction" because the medical community has stated that "affirmation of gender identity" is the best practice available for harm reduction.
This can mean two things, if it seems unobvious....
1. That the trans person is suffering from a personal problem created by a condition that causes them to see themselves as a gender different from their sex. Therefore, the best option is to just play along and let them present themselves however they want. This will ultimately reduce suicide in the trans community.
Or it could mean...
2. The trans person has no problem. The problem is with society not realizing that there is no significant difference between man and woman, even biologically, and gender and gender roles are all just made up relics of the past.
Now I always though people were arguing for point #1...which is to say that it's at least possible they are suffering from a medical condition and that by lying to them and telling a man that he's a woman will help him out in the long run.
The trans activist I heard actually said that they are arguing #2....and since they aren't suffering from any medical issues, they require no diagnosis or restrictions on age to begin altering their bodies with surgery and hormones.
Please don't respond that they are suffering from a real medical condition but there's no real difference between men and women biologically. That makes no sense...without the biological difference, it's hard to imagine what the condition could be. They have to be aware of this biological difference and it causes the feelings of conflict to create the condition.
Otherwise, we're talking about a #2 scenario where they have no problem at all except for a backwards society that thinks there's a difference between men and women.
I'm really curious which of these two positions people on the left are arguing for....because I suspect it's #1....but the activists might be arguing for #2.
Feel free to comment.
This can mean two things, if it seems unobvious....
1. That the trans person is suffering from a personal problem created by a condition that causes them to see themselves as a gender different from their sex. Therefore, the best option is to just play along and let them present themselves however they want. This will ultimately reduce suicide in the trans community.
Or it could mean...
2. The trans person has no problem. The problem is with society not realizing that there is no significant difference between man and woman, even biologically, and gender and gender roles are all just made up relics of the past.
Now I always though people were arguing for point #1...which is to say that it's at least possible they are suffering from a medical condition and that by lying to them and telling a man that he's a woman will help him out in the long run.
The trans activist I heard actually said that they are arguing #2....and since they aren't suffering from any medical issues, they require no diagnosis or restrictions on age to begin altering their bodies with surgery and hormones.
Please don't respond that they are suffering from a real medical condition but there's no real difference between men and women biologically. That makes no sense...without the biological difference, it's hard to imagine what the condition could be. They have to be aware of this biological difference and it causes the feelings of conflict to create the condition.
Otherwise, we're talking about a #2 scenario where they have no problem at all except for a backwards society that thinks there's a difference between men and women.
I'm really curious which of these two positions people on the left are arguing for....because I suspect it's #1....but the activists might be arguing for #2.
Feel free to comment.