Before we continue - I corrected something that I unintentionally said in post number 13. I highlighted it here as well as here. God "
does not" make anyone sin.
While one would readily see my position absolutely everywhere else I have commented - it was made unclear there by my leaving out those words.
Satan was never a programmable robot. ......
No one has said that anyone including Satan is a programmable robot. No one has said that God made Satan sin.
He had the power of choice, along with us and the other angels in heaven. Satan chose evil and suffered the consequence for it. Jeremiah's prophecy supports that God does not choose or decree evil for us.
"For I know the plans I have for you," says the LORD. "They are plans for good and not for disaster, to give you a future and a hope" (
Jeremiah 29:11).
All Reformed theologians including myself agree with you and Jeremiah on this.
Many Pentecostals are more Arminian, and that is why they often have problems with the assurance of salvation when they have battles with the flesh.
Speaking as a Pentecostal/Reformed believer (if we must use labels) - I totally agree.
God never "makes" anyone evil.
No one has said otherwise.
God cannot force anyone to anything.
I disagree that He cannot force anyone to do things. I agree that He does not force anyone to sin.
He has given all men and angels free will to choose. If not, then no one would be held responsible for sin, because they could rightly say, "I was forced. I couldn't help it." If God made Satan rebel, then He would have to take responsibility for it, and He could not condemn Satan and his angels to hell, because He would be unjust.
As they say at Geico - everyone knows that.
If that is the case then Paul would be lying when he said:
"I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain" (
Galatians 2:21). This shows that God's grace can be frustrated under certain circumstances.
Any "frustration" of God's grace would come through righteousness being shown to come through the law and not through Christ's work alone. Since it does not come through keeping the law - Christ's work of grace is not "in vain". Paul does not say that he frustrates the grace of God. He says quite the opposite.
No offense meant - but to say that Paul telling us that he does not frustrate God's grace dictates that God's grace can be frustrated is simply improper logic.
If God decreed evil, then why would He have pain and sorrow?
That the evil crucifixion of Jesus Christ caused God pain and sorrow is simply a fact. Why it did seems to me obvious. Even so - who can fathom the depth of it?
Wouldn't the cause of pain and sorrow result from Him not being able to save all whom He desires to save?
God expressed sorrow that Jerusalem would not be saved even though it was His desire that they be saved.
No one "made" them disbelieve. But God decreed that they would not be saved unless they believed - something He knew before the foundation of the world that they would not do.
People cannot get rid of the tension of the absolute and permitted will of God simply by ignoring what the scriptures clearly teach. Namely that both are true.