It seems that, without our genuine union with Christ, "works" and "grace" are really just two sides of the same coin (as the saying goes). I read about a new word this morning: "antinomianism" (it's new to me, anyway). This is the definition:
....which led me to this article:
The antinomian is by nature a person with a legalistic heart. He or she becomes an antinomian in reaction. But this implies only a different view of law, not a more biblical one.
Richard Baxter’s comments are therefore insightful:
There is only one genuine cure for legalism. It is the same medicine the gospel prescribes for antinomianism: understanding and tasting union with Jesus Christ Himself. This leads to a new love for and obedience to the law of God, which he now mediates to us in the gospel. This alone breaks the bonds of both legalism (the law is no longer divorced from the person of Christ) and antinomianism (we are not divorced from the law, which now comes to us from the hand of Christ and in the empowerment of the Spirit, who writes it in our hearts). -----> (complete article here)
So, like most truth, it seems that the Truth is between legalism and grace-only. To me....the clearest way to express that in a different way would be to say that in the middle is Christ. Instead of seeing the Bible as broken up into two (at least two) covenants.......we should (IMO) see continuity in covenants from Adam until Christ Jesus. What God desired all along (I think) is that humanity had their full allegiance to God (and followed His instruction and guidance ONLY).
Thoughts?
Antinomianism
adjective
relating to the view that Christians are released by grace from the obligation of observing the moral law.
adjective
relating to the view that Christians are released by grace from the obligation of observing the moral law.
....which led me to this article:
The One Genuine Cure for Legalism and Antinomianism
FROM Sinclair FergusonThe antinomian is by nature a person with a legalistic heart. He or she becomes an antinomian in reaction. But this implies only a different view of law, not a more biblical one.
Richard Baxter’s comments are therefore insightful:
Antinomianism rose among us from an obscure Preaching of Evangelical Grace, and insisting too much on tears and terrors.
The wholescale removal of the law seems to provide a refuge. But the problem is not with the law, but with the heart—and this remains unchanged. Thinking that his perspective is now the antithesis of legalism, the antinomian has written an inappropriate spiritual prescription. His sickness is not fully cured. Indeed the root cause of his disease has been masked rather than exposed and cured.
There is only one genuine cure for legalism. It is the same medicine the gospel prescribes for antinomianism: understanding and tasting union with Jesus Christ Himself. This leads to a new love for and obedience to the law of God, which he now mediates to us in the gospel. This alone breaks the bonds of both legalism (the law is no longer divorced from the person of Christ) and antinomianism (we are not divorced from the law, which now comes to us from the hand of Christ and in the empowerment of the Spirit, who writes it in our hearts). -----> (complete article here)
Thoughts?
Last edited: