I did also say that it was my opinion. anyway the truth is out there if you want to see it, just look it up. There is a war on terrorism in Bushes own words a war... so if this is so then why are the prisoners being held not treated as such under the geneva convention.
Maybe I do feel as if there is more to it than what politicians are telling me to think ! some points that make me wonder are. when Bush was told of those horrible events why didn't he bat an eyelid not one glimmer of shock, now I know he was in a classroom at the time but hey someone would show some form of shock even a split seconds worth if they were being told for the first time but not Bush it was like he was expecting it. There are a few other events that make me wonder too The papers say that temperatures got up to 800degrees and that was what melted the steel supports in the towers which helped them to collapse, unfortunately it takes a lot more than 800 degrees to melt steel, by some sources it takes 2800 degrees to melt so what happened then ? And why did one demolition expert first say it looked like a controlled demolition and then shortly after retracts it ? Here is the link to the article by an expert in demolition
http://www.abqjournal.com/aqvan09-11-01.htm
And according to an article I read this ex naval officer Delmart Edward "Mike" Vreeland knew in advance about the 911 attack and is now holed up in canada awaiting trial on some jumped up charges, he is fighting extradition to usa where lets face it he will be silenced once and for all if you know what i mean.
here is part of the article
The position of the United States government, as represented by Crown Solicitors in Toronto, is that all of this is nonsense. Vreeland, says the
Navy, was discharged as a Seaman after a few months of service for unsatisfactory performance in 1986. He has never had anything to do with
intelligence according to 1200 pages of Navy records filed in Toronto Superior Court.
"How is it," says Galati, "that the Navy says that he was only in the service a few months and then send us a 1200 page personnel file? Some of the entries are obvious forgeries or alterations and the sanitizing of his records was done so hurriedly that some dates of medical exams in the 1990s were left intact."
In a January 10, 2002 tactic worthy of Perry Mason, with the greatest possible risk to his client if it failed, attorney Slansky got the judge to agree to let him call the Pentagon from open court. Using a speaker phone, in front of at least six witnesses, Slansky first dialed directory information and got a number for the Pentagon switchboard. Then, calling that number he asked the Department of Defense operator to locate the office of Lt. Delmart Vreeland. Within moments the operator had confirmed Vreeland's posting, his rank as a Lieutenant O-3, his room number and given Slansky his direct-dial number.
All of this is a part of the court record. On January 17, as this writer sat in the courtroom, another mind-numbing event occurred.
As Vreeland sat shackled in a corner, closely flanked by two guards, the Crown Solicitor sought to debunk Vreeland's assertions that he had been assigned to travel to Moscow to review and retrieve highly technical and classified documents pertaining to Russian and Chinese efforts to counter the proposed US "Star Wars" missile defense system. [Ed note: FTW believes this to be a cover story.] "Why," said the Crown
Solicitor, "would the US choose, in a case involving some of the most highly technical intelligence, a random seaman with training in the tool and die field." The point that someone discharged in 1986 with no special training and rank would be sent to review technical documents
sounded reasonable - assuming that Vreeland's background was as the Solicitor argued.
The reasonableness vanished a few moments later as the Crown Solicitor argued that Vreeland, who has been in jail and without access to a computer
for thirteen months, had somehow cracked the Pentagon's personnel records and inserted his name, an office number, and telephone extension into the Pentagon database."
well somethings there seem to click this naval intelligence man knew about the twin towers and other targets in advance puts the thought across if this is so and it seems to be so then you can bet that he wasn't alone in this knowledge so then that to me would answer Bushes lack of shock but even worse than that is if this was known in advance why wasn't safety procedures underway, so whoever was in the know was guilty also of the twin towers events and as Bush is head of all then he was to blame as well. Why was nothing done?
and here is another site which is a mine of information
http://www.freeworldalliance.com/newsflash/newsflash.htm
I look into these sites and I do further research so call me a conspiratory theorist if you like, I just want to find the truth and I am not willing just to accept some politicians take on it as we all know how truthful politicians are !!!!
But hey I will repeat again this is my own opinion.
God Bless
