Dean Radin has been attempting to demonstrate various forms of parapsychology by experiment for many years, and claiming success for many years. One would think that scientists, for whom anomalous results are the most exciting (it's been said that "The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” but “That’s funny …”"), would jump at the opportunity to open a new field and make name for themselves, but they don't.Who knows, but the number of people thinking its valid or invalid does not make it valid or invalid.
I do not suppose its hard to repeat the experiment, so I am looking forward to see the results of others. But I am afraid it will be simply dismissed as "too spooky" without that.
The problem is that Radin's work, in general, is considered to be poor quality and biased towards the outcomes he seeks, and the results tend to be marginal. Attempts have been made to replicate some of his work with the usual level of success of paranormal replications, i.e. the more rigorous and well-controlled the experiment, the lower the significance of the results obtained. The consensus seems to be that if there was anything of merit in his claims, it would have become clear by now.
Upvote
0