I'm just going to post this all now. Marking the day: November 13th, 2020. Say what you will on November 14th; but in the 2nd half 2021, if this all goes down, I will be bringing this post back up later.
This is in reference to current news stories like these:
President Donald Trump's GOP wall is cracking as he fights election result - CNNPolitics
GOP senators, former security officials push for Biden to receive intelligence briefings
As you know, it is standard procedure for the President-elect to start receiving national security updates & information. This is not happening, because Trump refuses to concede. Even many Republicans are saying Biden needs to start receiving these. The argument then goes on to say that this happened before, back in Bush vs. Gore 2000, and this contributed to 9/11/2001 because Bush was not receiving those updates during the contested election.
First off, one aspect of this is simply not true: Bush vs. Gore did NOT cause the 9/11 attacks. Bush had a solid 9 months to get up to speed before 9/11. Even the terrorist pilots, according to the official story, only needed 6 months' pilot training, max. Probably more like 3. Hello--the pilots never even needed to learn how to land. Why would they? Whatever information Bush missed in November, he got in January. Any contribution Bush vs. Gore had to 9/11 is miniscule, at most.
That being said, the U.S. people are being conditioned (more like manipulated). You are having that thought planted in your head--now--that so-called "bureaucratic holes" in national security being caused by Trump vs. Biden expose the U.S. to some significant terrorist event later. Now, do I think Biden should be receiving national security updates? Yes, of course he should. That's the way it has always been done. Is the threat to national security by this real? Technically, yes. Of course it is. But the misinformation lies in exactly WHAT that threat is.
Here's how the events play out: first, a significant terrorist incident, probably in second-half of 2021. Trump supporters come back and say, "Look. We never had any terrorism the entire time Trump was President. And now Biden is President, and he has already failed. The terrorists got us under his administration." To which the Biden supporters come back and say, "Hey, this was all due to national security holes Trump caused, because he refused to concede." And maybe something else about Trump pulling troops out of Syria and Afghanistan. The nation--continuing to live in two different alternative universes--polarize even further--and this time over a life-and-death terrorist attack. Possibly significant death and destruction. Each side gets fed up with the other side causing people to DIE. Enough is enough, take up arms. Take out the other side by force, if need be--because after all, people are dying anyway.
That is the DESIGN of the terrorist attack. It's to make the right go further right, and the left go further left. You know what terrorism is: violence toward a political end. The terrorism is DESIGNED to polarize the country even further and try to plunge the U.S. into civil war. Trump would not just stage a terrorist incident himself--even supposing he would sink that low (something I don't entirely rule out...), that would only alienate his base even further. He has already alienated enough of his own base as it is, by calling the U.S. military and John McCain "losers", refusing to concede, and attacking Fox News.
I'm not nearly as confident about the location as I am about the strategy, but I would imagine such a terrorist incident would probably occur in Liberal-Central somewhere, just like 9/11 did. Probably [unlike 9/11] on the West Coast--I'm guessing either Portland, Seattle, or San Diego. For different reasons: the Pacific Northwest has been known to be a so-called "liberal hotbed" of BLM rioting. The reason for San Diego is because now, they can say, "the U.S.' porous border allowed the terrorists through. If we had built the border wall, this terrorist attack would never have happened."
The goal of the terrorism is not to make Trump the President. It's not to make Biden the President. It's not to Islamicize the country (however that would work...). It's foreign powers trying to divide and polarize the nation. It is laser-focused: specifically targeted to make the right move further to the right, and the left move further to the left--until you start to shoot each other (as if that hasn't happened already). See, I am saying it now. You can grade me on it later. I would love to deserve an F, but I don't think that is the reality. Jesus Christ is Lord, obviously I am not a part of any terrorist plot and would never wish it; but that's what it's looking like.
This is in reference to current news stories like these:
President Donald Trump's GOP wall is cracking as he fights election result - CNNPolitics
GOP senators, former security officials push for Biden to receive intelligence briefings
As you know, it is standard procedure for the President-elect to start receiving national security updates & information. This is not happening, because Trump refuses to concede. Even many Republicans are saying Biden needs to start receiving these. The argument then goes on to say that this happened before, back in Bush vs. Gore 2000, and this contributed to 9/11/2001 because Bush was not receiving those updates during the contested election.
First off, one aspect of this is simply not true: Bush vs. Gore did NOT cause the 9/11 attacks. Bush had a solid 9 months to get up to speed before 9/11. Even the terrorist pilots, according to the official story, only needed 6 months' pilot training, max. Probably more like 3. Hello--the pilots never even needed to learn how to land. Why would they? Whatever information Bush missed in November, he got in January. Any contribution Bush vs. Gore had to 9/11 is miniscule, at most.
That being said, the U.S. people are being conditioned (more like manipulated). You are having that thought planted in your head--now--that so-called "bureaucratic holes" in national security being caused by Trump vs. Biden expose the U.S. to some significant terrorist event later. Now, do I think Biden should be receiving national security updates? Yes, of course he should. That's the way it has always been done. Is the threat to national security by this real? Technically, yes. Of course it is. But the misinformation lies in exactly WHAT that threat is.
Here's how the events play out: first, a significant terrorist incident, probably in second-half of 2021. Trump supporters come back and say, "Look. We never had any terrorism the entire time Trump was President. And now Biden is President, and he has already failed. The terrorists got us under his administration." To which the Biden supporters come back and say, "Hey, this was all due to national security holes Trump caused, because he refused to concede." And maybe something else about Trump pulling troops out of Syria and Afghanistan. The nation--continuing to live in two different alternative universes--polarize even further--and this time over a life-and-death terrorist attack. Possibly significant death and destruction. Each side gets fed up with the other side causing people to DIE. Enough is enough, take up arms. Take out the other side by force, if need be--because after all, people are dying anyway.
That is the DESIGN of the terrorist attack. It's to make the right go further right, and the left go further left. You know what terrorism is: violence toward a political end. The terrorism is DESIGNED to polarize the country even further and try to plunge the U.S. into civil war. Trump would not just stage a terrorist incident himself--even supposing he would sink that low (something I don't entirely rule out...), that would only alienate his base even further. He has already alienated enough of his own base as it is, by calling the U.S. military and John McCain "losers", refusing to concede, and attacking Fox News.
I'm not nearly as confident about the location as I am about the strategy, but I would imagine such a terrorist incident would probably occur in Liberal-Central somewhere, just like 9/11 did. Probably [unlike 9/11] on the West Coast--I'm guessing either Portland, Seattle, or San Diego. For different reasons: the Pacific Northwest has been known to be a so-called "liberal hotbed" of BLM rioting. The reason for San Diego is because now, they can say, "the U.S.' porous border allowed the terrorists through. If we had built the border wall, this terrorist attack would never have happened."
The goal of the terrorism is not to make Trump the President. It's not to make Biden the President. It's not to Islamicize the country (however that would work...). It's foreign powers trying to divide and polarize the nation. It is laser-focused: specifically targeted to make the right move further to the right, and the left move further to the left--until you start to shoot each other (as if that hasn't happened already). See, I am saying it now. You can grade me on it later. I would love to deserve an F, but I don't think that is the reality. Jesus Christ is Lord, obviously I am not a part of any terrorist plot and would never wish it; but that's what it's looking like.
