The Millennial temple built by Jesus in Zech.6:12-13

[victorinus]

Amjillennialism?

that is not clearly written

 

[victorinus]

Me too, that's why I gave you a bunch of other verses where it is clearly written.

they have nothing to do with rev 20

 

[SeventyOne]

they have nothing to do with rev 20

Ok, please explain to me how they do not. Start with any one you wish.

 

[victorinus]

Ok, please explain to me how they do not. Start with any one you wish.

we are talking about who reigns during the thousand years

 

[SeventyOne]

we are talking about who reigns during the thousand years

Yea, I know.

 

[victorinus]

Yea, I know.

why would it end if Jesus were reigning?

 

[SeventyOne]

why would it end if Jesus were reigning?

Because it has a specific purpose. It ending doesn't mean Jesus stops being King.

 

[parousia70]

Because it has a specific purpose. It ending doesn't mean Jesus stops being King.

So He's not King now?

 

[SeventyOne]

So He's not King now?

What are you talking about?

 

[victorinus]

Because it has a specific purpose

do you know the purpose or are you just assuming there is a purpose for what is your interpretation

 

[SeventyOne]

do you know the purpose or are you just assuming there is a purpose for what is your interpretation

Would either answer make a difference to you?

 

[victorinus]

Would either answer make a difference to you?

I believe the purpose of the thousand year reign was to allow the early church a chance to get established

 

[Quasar92]

that is not clearly written

My apology; it was a typo which has been corrected. It should have read, Amillennialism.


Quasar92

 

[BABerean2]

Joh 2:18　 So the Jews answered and said to Him, "What sign do You show to us, since You do these things?"　
Joh 2:19　 Jesus answered and said to them, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up."　
Joh 2:20　 Then the Jews said, "It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and will You raise it up in three days?"　
Joh 2:21　 But He was speaking of the temple of His body.　


.

 

[SeventyOne]

Joh 2:18　 So the Jews answered and said to Him, "What sign do You show to us, since You do these things?"　
Joh 2:19　 Jesus answered and said to them, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up."　
Joh 2:20　 Then the Jews said, "It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and will You raise it up in three days?"　
Joh 2:21　 But He was speaking of the temple of His body.　


.

This passage is proof that our bodily temples and a physical temple can co-exist.

 

[BABerean2]

This passage is proof that our bodily temples and a physical temple can co-exist.

Why did God rip the temple veil in half when Christ died on the Cross?

Why has the New Covenant made the Old Covenant "obsolete" in Hebrews 8:13?

Why is there no more offering for sin in Hebrews 10:16-18?

.

 

[SeventyOne]

Why did God rip the temple veil in half when Christ died on the Cross?

Why has the New Covenant made the Old Covenant "obsolete" in Hebrews 8:13?

Why is there no more offering for sin in Hebrews 10:16-18?

.

There's more to the temple than sacrifices for sin. It is a dwelling of the Lord and a place where people went to worship. The veil was torn in two because the path to the Lord had been opened, but that didn't make it no longer a temple. Even after the resurrection, the disciples still went to the temple to teach, pray, and worship. Paul even went through the temple purifications before praying there. They didn't see it as useless as you do.

I really don't understand how a physical temple is somehow out of scope. People claim our physical bodies are temples (and rightly so), and they claim the Church corporately is a temple (and again, rightly so), but then after claiming there are literally billions of these physical temples throughout the centuries, one more physical temple is somehow crossing an imaginary line. I don't think that argument was thought through very well.

 

[Quasar92]

try what is clearly written in rev 20[/QUOTE


So, what about Rev.20? How is it related to Acts 2:29-30 and 15:16?


Quasar02]

 

[victorinus]

Me too, that's why I gave you a bunch of other verses where it is clearly written. You haven't addressed any of it "clearly" yet.

they don't apply to rev 20

 

[SeventyOne]

they don't apply to rev 20

You've already said that, to which I responded in post #43...

Ok, please explain to me how they do not. Start with any one you wish.

You haven't given any details of your conclusion as of yet.