If there is not a literal mark of the beast then why does Revelation say a person cannot buy/sell without it?
It seems that this is something economic which a person is forced to take in order to buy/sell. It sounds to me like a way to try to thwart crime (probably terrorism) by being able to track the whereabouts of every single individual on the planet at all times.
Either that, or it is an attempt to go to a cashless society. But why have a cashless society in the first place? Obviously, the point would be to track an individual. You cannot track cash, so the point is to do away with cash and hence do away with crime.
Or by God's promises.I think the mindset is that if you went into a store they would refuse to sell to you if you don't have the mark
this could easily be overcome with many goods being sold on a black market
See above!Matthew 6:33 But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and His righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
On your part? I agree.well here's a simple case of totally missing the point
The mark will involve DNA fusion. The abomination of desolation will take place within the human temple. The days are fast approaching.
The mark will involve DNA fusion. The abomination of desolation will take place within the human temple. The days are fast approaching.
This is an interesting statement. I still remain open to ideas about the mark, but believe it is literal (although I definitely recognize certain spiritual connotations to it).
The interesting thing is there is definitely now technology for the mark. However, the antichrist will have to open his mouth in blasphemy against God. I am not sure the entire world is ready for that yet...I mean, the Democrats took God out of their platform and it caused a huge stir.
Maybe it's talking specifically about the God of the Bible though - in which case I definitely think that our society is ready.
I too believe the mark to be literal and tangible. I just happen to think it will include a fusion with satanic DNA. If you pay attention to satan's world, marketing is indoctrinating us into the idea of fusion. Transhumanism, the next leap of the lie of evolution is also being rammed down our throats via movies like Transformers, Spiderman, X-Men, etc., etc. All of the super heroes are hybrids and people love them. Remember the days of Noah, how that the sons of God came into the daughters of men and they bare children unto them, the Nephilim, the men of renown, what we now know as the demigods. Lady Gaga performed a ceremony where she was rebirthed and hatched from a reptilian egg representing a race within the human race. This stuff is everywhere in their rituals performed at the Olympics, Super Bowl half time show, awards shows, music videos, movies, television, and most importantly, the Bible clearly speaks of it. Genesis 6, Daniel 2:43, Jude.
My point is that no matter what the circumstances God has no problem fulfilling His promises to His people. I.E.why you asking I quoted your statement as reference to what I was showing as to missing the point............are you not getting that either ?
I too believe the mark to be literal and tangible. I just happen to think it will include a fusion with satanic DNA.
DNA is in the realm of flesh, satan was created as a spirit
"satanic DNA fusion" is in the realm of fantasy / science fiction, something from the imaginations of men, it certainly isn't found in God's written word
Achilles6129 said:I do still believe that the most reasonable view of the mark of the beast is probably going to be an invisible ink tattoo mark of some sort.
I pointed out earlier on this thread how the Greek letter "stigma" which is also a Greek word has been associated with "666." Stigma does connote "tattoo mark" in Greek. Manasseh then pointed out that this did not happen until around the 9th century, which is true. However, it is still interesting that this became associated with 666.
I am thinking either a tattoo mark of a computer chip of some sort. Who knows when it will happen - could be a few years or could be a few decades.
I do still believe that the most reasonable view of the mark of the beast is probably going to be an invisible ink tattoo mark of some sort.
I pointed out earlier on this thread how the Greek letter "stigma" which is also a Greek word has been associated with "666." Stigma does connote "tattoo mark" in Greek. Manasseh then pointed out that this did not happen until around the 9th century, which is true. However, it is still interesting that this became associated with 666.
I am thinking either a tattoo mark of a computer chip of some sort. Who knows when it will happen - could be a few years or could be a few decades.