- Dec 25, 2003
- 42,058
- 16,810
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
Great. So what is to investigate about a 17 year-old laughing about farting or liking beer?
You mean a 54 year old lying about farting.
Upvote
0
Great. So what is to investigate about a 17 year-old laughing about farting or liking beer?
Funny this.
Funny that he "traveled the country facilitating rape and assault prevention lectures, seminars, and workshops for women of all ages", and now he doesn't seem concerned about the very women he's trying to help.
He's more worried about the bravado of men than hte safety of women. Period. Sure, it's his choice.
I take it you are jumping on the sodomy bandwagon. That was back in the early 80's, a lifetime ago, not the wide-open days of 2018. Think about that for even a few seconds.You mean a 54 year old lying about farting.
I take it you are jumping on the sodomy bandwagon. That was back in the early 80's, a lifetime ago, not the wide-open days of 2018.
Think about that for even a few seconds.
No one even thought about disgusting things like that. No one. If you even hinted at that kind of behavior in those days, you would have been immediately shunned as a sick pervert, by both boys and girls.
Being wrong and lying are two different things.but he lied when he claimed it was a reference to farting. Just like Devil's Triangle, Ralph Club and Renate alumnus.
I take it you are jumping on the sodomy bandwagon.
That was back in the early 80's, a lifetime ago, not the wide-open days of 2018. Think about that for even a few seconds.
No one even thought about disgusting things like that. No one. If you even hinted at that kind of behavior in those days, you would have been immediately shunned as a sick pervert, by both boys and girls.
But, belonging to a "Fart Club" was funny, and something you would have been seen as "cool" for writing about in a yearbook.... or wherever it was.
Ahhhh wanting to play games, ok then where is the irrefutable proof that the opinion article you posted is 100% accurate?
(This should be good)...
Which opinion article are you referring to?
What's good about another transparent attempt to avoid backing up your assertions?
We are not talking about whether or not queers existed then. Of course they did. They existed in Biblical times, and the Bible, itself, tells us about it.
It's 2018. Who hasn't jumped on the sodomy bandwagon at least once?
Are you really trying to portray the 1980s as sexually innocent and naive? Seriously?
Back when rock stars routinely took girlfriends barely out of middle school? Are you familiar with the Motley Crue "Spaghetti Incident"? Ted Nugent took guardianship of Pele Massa in 1978. Full Metal Jacket was released in 1987 and a substantial portion of that movie is jokes about gay sex.
Not only that, but the Senators were forbidden to reveal what the report said, although some of them did say it did NOT exonerate him.The FBI was the one tasked with looking into the claims. Too bad Trump limited what they could investigate. Weird choice, given how sure he must have been that there was nothing bad to find.
I don't know anything of the kind. Some people leak, others do not.And you know anything incriminating against Kavanaugh would have "leaked" by now so the logical conclusion is the expanded background check found nothing.
The one you posted where they used anonymous sources for their supposedly impeccable information.
It turns out it was the Senate who dictated what the terms and scope of the investigation was supposed to be.
You claimed it was an opinion piece. Now you're saying it was reporting from an anonymous source. Why the backpedaling?
Citation needed.
It is an opinion piece or maybe better yet a composed piece since that's the only time anonymous sources are used.
Try reading the Atlantic periodically or better yet use your search engine to find the refuting article I mentioned. Shouldn't be too hard to type in "Senate dictated terms of FBI investigation into Kavanaugh", that is unless plausible ignorance is preferable.
Not my job to do your work for you, and given that search result returns articles saying that the White House limited the probe, I'm not sure you want me to.
And that is mainly thanks to the snotty personal attitudes of those around here calling themselves feminists.
Interesting that a man is defining feminism.I don't understand how anyone could've come away from the Kavanaugh hearings with this opinion if they weren't already predisposed to favoring Republicans.
Also, who is this guy? He's written a couple self-help books that have gotten almost zero traction. He's got no reviews on Goodreads and only a handful of (probably fake) ones on Amazon. His Facebook and Twitter accounts are nothing but silly feel-good slogans.
Those uppity women don’t know their places, do they? Shameful.Thank goodness we don't have any in our church.
Maybe most of them don't even go to church?
M-Bob
What does this have to do with what Trump was doing 20 years ago?You mean a 54 year old lying about farting.
Those uppity women don’t know their places, do they? Shameful.