OpenDoor said:Also, in Hebrews 1:5 what is your understanding of, "to which of the angels did God ever say..."
3 Angels Messages said:Again, the context is speaking of the Father and of the Son [both Uncreated Creator; Hebrews 1:8], and so when we come to Hebrews 1:5 and its "angel" passage [already knowing that the word "angel" simply means "messenger", and it is the context which further declares connotation], we then consider the context, that this "angel" passage is referring to those "angels" which are of the created Heavenly Host, like Gabriel, Cherubim, Seraphim, Lucifer etc. For the passages of Hebrews are showing how Christ Jesus [GOD, the Son] is above all that which is created, He is ruler [some passages KJV use the word "prince" "sar"] of all.
OpenDoor said:So you agree that no angel (in any sense of the word) was ever told, "You are my Son, today I have begotten you". Correct?
3 Angels Messages said:Though my previous reply should already answer your question, but I will yet answer again, but before I answer, I will also ask, and require an answer of thee...
Is Christ Jesus also called "the Apostle" [Hebrews 3:1], "messenger of the covenant" [Malachi 3:1], "the angel of His presence" [Isaiah 63:9], "sent of the Father" [John 5:23], "the presence of God" [Psalms 68:8], "the Angel of the Lord" [Exodus 3:2], "his angel" [Daniel 3:28]?
[1.] Since Jesus is the "Apostle", where from is He this "Apostle"? From "Heaven", the "sent" of the Father. And one who is "sent", as Jesus was, is a "messenger", and thus fits the definition of "angel", which simply means "messenger".OpenDoor said:apostle and high priest
Since I understand the messenger who prepares the way to be John the Baptist. I think the text is referring to the same messenger since it is the same verse.
This is probably refering to Christ. Some bibles read as "or Savior".
I'm not finding this in Psalms 68:8?
There is actually a lot of debate regarding this verse, but I would agree that God appeared to Moses in the burning bush.
This seems to just be referring to an angel of the Lord...
3 Angels Mesages said:http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126/#post60476518
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126/#post60476555
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126/#post60476577
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126/#post60476603
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126/#post60478069
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-2/#post60478184
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-2/#post60478241
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-2/#post60483755
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-3/#post60483954
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-3/#post60484819
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-4/#post60485547
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-4/#post60485562
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-5/#post60486620
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-7/#post60487331
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-8/#post60487923
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-8/#post60488197
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-10/#post60493716
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-11/#post60494632
I have been looking over the text. You are correct, the messenger(first use) and the messenger(second use) are separate. This is why some versions of the bible use "even" instead of "and".It is impossible for John the Baptist [forerunner] to be both messengers of Malachi 3:1http://www.blueletterbible.org/comm...ntID=1506&commInfo=5&topic=Daniel&ar=Dan_3_25
3 Angels Messages said:
OK, back to zeke37's last objection.in Daniel 10, Michael is not described as one describes God.
he is but "one" of obv. more than one chief princes (plural),
not consistant with the whole gist of the Bible.
in Jude, all Michael "the arcangel" says to Satan is "the Lord rebuke you",
inconsistant with Christ's actions in the Gospels.
in Rev Jesus Christ is called by name, before and after the Michael text of Rev12.
so your theory lacks consistency. no offence.....
Allow me to demonstrate scripturally, that just because others [human, which are a creature of the Creator] in Scripture are also named "Michael", would not be blasphemous for them to be so named, nor would it bring Jesus/Michael Archangel down to being a created being; and so also, allow me to show that the conclusion jumped to in reply, in which it is posited, that just because others in Scripture were so name "Michael", does not then mean that "Michael [Archangel]" is also created, for it does not logically follow. That is leaping to where no one is in scripture is pointing to. Let us see why by gathering some points and evidence to consider.LionKing said:Uhmmm, I guess this guy's parents committed blasphemy when they named their son Michael, huh?
And their brethren of the house of their fathers were, Michael, and Meshullam, and Sheba, and Jorai, and Jacan, and Zia, and Heber, seven. 1 Chronicles 5:13
PS. Michael means "who is like God?"
The Great Controversy concept actually began by some expositors in the 17th century, namely Thomas Tillam (1657)
http://www.sealingtime.com/media/The Seventh Day Sabbath Sought Out - Thomas Tillam - 1657.pdf
Excerpt from Chapter 1 by Thomas Tillam in 1657:"The first Royal Law that ever Jehovah instituted, and for our Example celebrated, (namely His blessed Seventh-day Sabbath,) is in these very last days become the last great controversy between the Saints and the Man of Sin, The Changer of Times and Laws.
Awake ye slumbering Virgins, the figtree is apparently budded, the signs of his second coming who is The Lord of the Sabbath, are so fairly visible, that although the day and hour be not known, yet doubtless this generation shall crown obedient Saints with everlasting Rest..."
Which generation is Jesus talking about in Matt 24?
Blue Letter Bible - Search Results for YLT
"this generation"
occurs 18 times in 17 verses
NKJV) Matthew 23:36 "Assuredly I say to you, all these things will come upon this generation.
The Destruction of Jerusalem - George Peter Holford, 1805AD
"I consider the Prophecy relative to the destruction of the Jewish nation,
if there were nothing else to support Christianity, as absolutely irresistible."
(Mr. Erskine's Speech, at the Trial of Williams, for publishing Paine's Age of Reason)
Hi LLoJ,LittleLambofJesus said:I am just gonna lurk in this thread awhile, while browsing thru some others. [links removed, distractive, not productive, also not originally posted by LLoJ, but we shall look at the originating objection in them, of which each begins with the same incorrect theological assumption, namely that 'Michael and his angels, overcame the Dragon and his angels, by the Blood of the Lamb'] ...
In all courtesy and Christian charity, I am asking that you [and any] please refrain from introducing distracting topics into the thread. Please stay on OP topic, and in case it was somehow forgotten, or misunderstood, please see that OP here http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126/#post60476518 . Thank you. If you [or any] would like to start another thread on that topic, or another, please do so, and please refrain from linking to it here. This OP is about the scriptural theology that Michael Archangel is Jesus, Uncreated Creator, God the Son, for Who is like Unto God, the Highest Messenger [sent] of the Father?Which generation is Jesus talking about in Matt 24?...
What if the destruction of Herod's temple in ad70 was the type of final last judgement, which I view showing in chapts 1-19 in RevelationUnfortunately, God's people throughout every generation thought they were the "last generation". =/
This was a healthy way to think though, it's what kept God's people from getting discouraged.
Concerning the "This Generation Shall Not Pass Away", here are some excellent sources:
Regarding the coming destruction of Jerusalem and its temple, Jesus answered that it would take place during His contemporary generation (Matt. 23:36). They were to experience the "time of punishment in fulfillment of all that has been written" (Luke 21:22). This judgment serves at the same time as a prophetic type of the last judgment, when "all the nations of the earth will mourn" because of Christ (Matt. 24:30; Rev. 1:7). Jesus' own generation thus functions as a type of the last generation that will reject the Messiahship of Jesus.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Angels Messages said:
The Great Controversy, Revelation 12, Michael vs Dragon:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126/#post60476518
What The Protestant, Bible Commentators, World Renown Theologians and Founders Say Part 1:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126/#post60476555
What The Protestant, Bible Commentators, World Renown Theologians and Founders Say Part 2:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126/#post60476577
What The Protestant, Bible Commentators, World Renown Theologians and Founders Say Part 3:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126/#post60476603
The Basic Definitions, The Main Texts:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126/#post60478069
Who Is Like Unto God?:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-2/#post60478184
Comparisons, Joshua/Moses/Acts - Worship:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-2/#post60478241
Who Hath Seen God? The Captain [Ruler], The Angel Of God And The Pillar Of Cloud And Fire:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-2/#post60483755
The Angel Of His [The Father's] Presence, Jesus Is God [The Son]:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-3/#post60483954
The Wonderful Name:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-3/#post60484819
The LORD Rebuke Thee:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-4/#post60485547
The Wrestling, And The New Name:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-4/#post60485562
The Angel Of The LORD, And The Angel Of God:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-5/#post60486620
Questions And Answers Part 1; Who Needed Help, Michael or Gabriel?
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-7/#post60487331
Questions And Answers Part 2; The Angel In His Presence And The Angel Of His Presence, Is Jesus Referred To As An Angel In Scripture?:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-8/#post60487923
Gabriel Stood To Help Michael Or Darius?, The Unbreakable Structure Of Daniel:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-8/#post60488197
The Resurrection Of Moses By Michael/Jesus, The Texts:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655.../#post60493716
Is Christ Jesus also called "the Apostle" [Hebrews 3:1], "messenger of the covenant" [Malachi 3:1], "the angel of His presence" [Isaiah 63:9], "sent of the Father" [John 5:23], "the presence of God" [Psalms 68:8], "the Angel of the Lord" [Exodus 3:2], "his angel" [Daniel 3:28]?
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655.../#post60494632
A Further Look At The Word "Angel":
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-11/#post60494936
Questions And Answers Part 3; Did Daniel See Jesus? Comparisons Of The Texts:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-11/#post60500594
A Response To Objection, The Names, Michael and Jesus:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-11/#post60501092
Is Naming A Human, "Michael", Blasphemous? No...
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-11/#post60508285
Who Overcame By The Blood Of The Lamb?
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-12/#post60512319
Lysimachus said:
Close of Probation, soon... for the events of Daniel 11:40(b)-45 are soon to be fullfilled in rapid succession... and that which follows is...Links for additional [and/or similar] studies on the same topic:
JESUS In Book Of Daniel - The Biblical TRUTH
Everlasting Gospel
Who is Michael the Archangel in the Bible?
The Divine Christ in the Old Testament
An "Angel" Named Yahweh
Who Is Michael The Archangel?
Everlasting Gospel: An Angel called Jehovah
Everlasting Gospel: The Angel of Jehovah is not Jehovah himself?
Adventist Defense League
Original posts:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7655126-12/#post60556207
The Great Controversy - Michael vs Dragon [iow - Jesus vs Satan]...
I spent some time talking with an elder from the local Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses - he paid me a visit, and in conversation told me he was an elder - he is a very polite and patient man, quite a shining light among his people and , in my opinion, a very good ambassador for his religion.
In our conversation he spoke of the great contest between Jehovah and Satan in which Jehovah's name will be vindicated and all Satan's lies will be refuted by the faithful goodness of Jesus Christ and of the witnesses. In his explanation he informed me that their religion (the people, to be more precise) is called Jehovah's witnesses because they are witnesses in a grand courtroom drama with Satan accusing mankind and Jehovah and Jehovah calling forth human witnesses (chief among whom is Jesus Christ) to defend Jehovah's name. In fact their religion takes it name, he said, from a passage in the bible, he then quoted this verse (from the New World Translation)(Isaiah 43:10, 11) 10 YOU are my witnesses, is the utterance of Jehovah, even my servant whom I have chosen, in order that YOU may know and have faith in me, and that YOU may understand that I am the same One. Before me there was no God formed, and after me there continued to be none. 11 II am Jehovah, and besides me there is no savior.My New Jerusalem Bible says it slightly differently, thus:
(Isaiah 43:10-11 NJB) You yourselves are my witnesses, declares Yahweh, and the servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe me and understand that it is I. No god was formed before me, nor will be after me. (11) I, I am Yahweh, and there is no other Saviour but me.Now, you may be wondering by now why I am writing all this about Jehovah's witnesses and their teaching about Jehovah vindicating his name. Well, my reason is this:
The sacred scriptures do include information about Satan accusing God's people and by implication impugning God's name. We can see this in the beginning chapters of Job, yet Satan accusations and the refutation of them is not a major theme in scripture. It is present but as a background story in some parts of scripture to explain specific incidents and specific issues that were at stake at the time of those incidents.Now, having said what I think and having given some background about why I think it, I want to make an observation about this thread and especially about the the quote at the bottom of this post. This thread is unbalanced in its approach to scripture because it takes a theme, that is more incidental than it is central to scripture, and expands it into the chief theme of scripture. By doing this it makes a courtroom drama into the reason for everything that is said in the bible. Rather than seeing Jesus as the centre and circumference of the scriptural world view this thread places a controversy between Christ and Satan at the centre. In doing this scripture is distorted. I think that the Christians participating in this thread know this at heart and some will know it consciously and - I hope - have raised it as an objection to the thesis behind this thread. I hope you will all join me in fighting against this tendency to distort the scriptures and place Christ in the centre and in every place in your own reading of sacred scripture.
It is important to keep one's mind and heart firmly focused on what the scriptures do present as their major theme. That theme is Jesus Christ himself. His coming, his teaching, his miracles, his goodness, his love, his victory over death and his promises to us. The whole of the old testament was opened up to the disciples who were on the road to Emmaus by Jesus, after the resurrection, as he explained to them how all that was written in the scriptures was written about him. We ought to remember that the old testament and the new testament exist to bear testimony to Jesus Christ.
God be merciful to us all.
God is "Judge of all", yes?...he spoke of the great contest between Jehovah and Satan in which Jehovah's name will be vindicated and all Satan's lies will be refuted by the faithful goodness of Jesus Christ and of the witnesses ...
... This thread is unbalanced in its approach to scripture because it takes a theme, that is more incidental than it is central to scripture, and expands it into the chief theme of scripture. By doing this it makes a courtroom drama into the reason for everything that is said in the bible. ...