And if you were complaining about this a decade ago, then you might have some standing. It seems odd that this only now a problem.Plenty of reason to lose sleep over it if you are an American taxpayer. What is the cost of 30 agents in tactical gear arresting a man after hours vs 1 agent in a suit in the morning or afternoon.
Your tax dollars at work
If you are going to assert your opinions as facts, which is what you did, you cannot be surprised when people ask for proof. I have provided the logic and facts to support what I said in several posts all you have to do is look.
You have not provided any evidence that there was anything incorrect about their procedure, you only provided your non-professional opinion.
What are you expecting, did you want me to provide you with a copy of the FBI policy and procedures governing arrests and warrant service? Or do you think it would just be ok to admit that simple common sense dictates that the number of agents used on this arrest was excessive.
If you're going to say they don't do something regularly, then having evidence like the policy and procedures does help.
Plenty of reason to lose sleep over it if you are an American taxpayer. What is the cost of 30 agents in tactical gear arresting a man after hours vs 1 agent in a suit in the morning or afternoon.
Your tax dollars at work
I will provide that right after you prove that the FBI uses 30 agents to server an arrest warrant on a non violent subject on a regular basis as a standard practice.
I think many of us see plenty wrong, the outstanding question is do we have justice for all or just for some?
They didn't commit crimes, Roger Stone did. You don't arrest non-criminals because you don't like them. The only thing I see as wrong is the appeal to whataboutism to ignore the crimes of Roger Stone.
