chaz345
Well-Known Member
The research is credible, but whatever you want to believe Chaz. If you want to believe random people on the internet who are not MDs or scientists, that's entirely up to you. I'm done arguing it with you because it's pointless. There's sufficient information and evidence out there - additional to FoK - that tell me that it's a healthier lifestyle than the average American lifestyle.
What makes it credible though if it's not peer reviewed, which you yourself said in this thread that science must be? Without peer review, the fact that a person doing research is a doctor or scientist is meaningless. The entire point of peer review is to make sure there's no bias in the way the research was constructed. Something that definitely can't be said in this case.
And I'm not at all arguing that it's not more healthy than the average American lifestyle, I'm arguing that it's the absence of animal protein that makes it more healthy. They took the average American diet, changed about a gazillion things about it, saw that the subjects were healthier and decided that it was the lack of animal protein. Which of course they would if that's what they wanted to "prove" in the first place.
Upvote
0