Subduction Zone
Regular Member
Not really. There is a better source.It is the only reliable source about God's creation.
Upvote
0
Not really. There is a better source.It is the only reliable source about God's creation.
You'll have to excuse some people. They worry about we Christians breaking the Ten Commandments; but display those Commandments in a public setting and they'll be the first to demand they be removed.It is the only reliable source about God's creation.
I'm not going to get into that here.Has that been confirmed by God, that His originals are wrong.
The question is, have you seen what you say exist, through a telescope.
If you would be offended by a statue of Baphomet in a "public location" then you should be offended by the Ten Commandments at the same location. They are both allowed or they are both banned.You'll have to excuse some people. They worry about we Christians breaking the Ten Commandments; but display those Commandments in a public setting and they'll be the first to demand they be removed.
Roy Moore - Wikipedia
That's not how it works.If you would be offended by a statue of Baphomet in a "public location" then you should be offended by the Ten Commandments at the same location.
Don't underestimate your peers.Subduction Zone said:They are both allowed or they are both banned.
That is how it works. Check the Constitution.That's not how it works.
Baphomet didn't die for my sins.Don't underestimate your peers.
If both were displayed, they'd just holler twice as loudly.
If you would be offended by a statue of Baphomet in a "public location" then you should be offended by the Ten Commandments at the same location. They are both allowed or they are both banned.
Of course. And I've seen through microscopes---both have been around many, many centuries now.
Good point!There are plenty of pagan statues already in washington.
That's a point all in itself.That is how it works. Check the Constitution.
Yep, both Saturn & Jupiter with a 4.5 Reflector, great view of both of them.The question is, have you seen what you say exist, through a telescope.
So you have seen saturn and not only have seen saturn, but saturn looked like this moving across the sky.
Well like i have said prove me wrong, post any recordings of saturn, etc.. moving in the sky where saturn looks like the image below and not like a light giving star.
Post a moving saturn in the sky, like this one.
View attachment 298732
because this is what is see and have
recorded moving through the sky.
View attachment 298733
The problem with using Isaiah to prove anything one way or another about the earth's shape, is that it's full of figurative language.Okay ... let's look at the first one.
Isaiah 40:22a It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth,
If this is speaking of a flat earth, is drawing a circle on a globe, then standing over that circle and looking down, the same thing as saying that globe is flat? of course not.
And as far as what is specifically meant by "the circle of the earth" isn't clear.
Was it the Article circle, before the Arctic circle was drawn (i.e., an anachronism)?
Was it a line of latitude before latitudes were lined (i.e., an anachronism)?
Was it some circle on a map known to Isaiah and his generation?
To say it is referencing a flat earth is overlooking too many other explanations.
We take this passage literally:Does anyone preach that God literally held the water in his physical hand or put the dust of the earth in an actual basket? Or actually used scales to weigh the mountains?