The Flat Earth Bible

[JohnEmmett]

see this moving through the sky.

you are not open enough to accept science


atheists are not open enough to accept God

 

[d taylor]

Interesting that the so called planets are named after pagan gods.

 

[d taylor]

you are not open minded enough to accept science


atheists are not open minded enough to accept God

When science agrees with God's creation in the Bible i will accept it. All they have to do is say the sun moves over the earth, just like it is stated in the Bible. Or God created two great lights the sun and moon, etc...

 

[essentialsaltes]

.

 

[renniks]

He was not in human flesh, but he existed in human form.

Not before the incarnation. You are confusing his ability to take on form to him being restricted to one.

Am I a God who is near,” declares the Lord,
“And not a God far off?
“Can a man hide himself in hiding places
So I do not see him?” declares the Lord.
“Do I not fill the heavens and the earth?” declares the Lord.

Source: 18 Bible verses about God's Omnipresence

 

[mmksparbud]

perhaps God is merely a person


similar to the Gods in general

Then He would not be God. He is Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

 

[mmksparbud]

Interesting that the so called planets are named after pagan gods.

So are then days of the week. But they bare not what God named them---and the bible says He also names the stars, some of which are planets, we just do not know those names.

 

[JohnEmmett]

Then He would not be God. He is Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

I don't know, syncretism isn't perfect

 

[d taylor]

To bad this person did not show the original recording as seen through his telescope.

 

[JohnEmmett]

youtu.be/gfhiLIktIzA?t=409

 

[essentialsaltes]

To bad this person did not show the original recording as seen through his telescope.

What makes you think it isn't?

 

[mmksparbud]

I don't know, syncretism isn't perfect

God is.

 

[d taylor]

What makes you think it isn't?

Jan Koet
5 months ago
That's correct! Also in the original video Saturn is much dimmer, I processed that video to make Saturn brighter.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Jan Koet
5 months ago
That's correct! Also in the original video Saturn is much dimmer, I processed that video to make Saturn brighter.

And would that make a significant different to what's being shown?

Changing the brightness of a dim object that is next to a very bright object?

 

[pgp_protector]

Point me to one where i can go and see this moving through the sky.

Orion SkyQuest XX16G Go-To Truss Tube Dobsonian Telescope

 

[JohnEmmett]

syncretism isn't perfect

God is.

…

 

[d taylor]

Orion SkyQuest XX16G Go-To Truss Tube Dobsonian Telescope

I will get one of these and then i can see for myself.

 

[d taylor]

And would that make a significant different to what's being shown?

Changing the brightness of a dim object that is next to a very bright object?

I do not know, but again we are not viewing what one would see looking through the telescope.

But saturn going behind the moon is of no surprise as I believe the order of the heights of the lights God created. The moon is closest then the sun and then stars.

 

[essentialsaltes]

But saturn going behind the moon

You said you wanted a video "where i can go and see [Saturn with rings] moving through the sky."

 

[d taylor]

You said you wanted a video "where i can go and see [Saturn with rings] moving through the sky."

No i posted a doctored up picture of saturn stating that i would like to see the saturn of these doctored up photos in a video recording.

I have quite a few video recording of saturn with rings.