The FDA has been suppressing a cancer cure and manipulating statistics.

[tatumsid]

Everyone must take a stand against the evils caused by money.

 

[pitabread]

Proof There's No FDA-Big Pharma Conspiracy Suppressing Cancer Cures

 

[tatumsid]

Proof There's No FDA-Big Pharma Conspiracy Suppressing Cancer Cures

how so you explain the epic witch hunt and the $60 million effort to get antineoplastons off the market? It wasn't drugs safety because the drug is admitted to be non toxic with no side effects.

 

[Radagast]

because the drug is admitted to be non toxic with no side effects.

This is quite simply false: there are side-effects, some of them severe.

There is also no evidence that antineoplastons have any benefit.

 

[tatumsid]

This is quite simply false: there are side-effects, some of them severe.

There is also no evidence that antineoplastons have any benefit.

So you didn’t watch the video where it clearly shows that patient after patient was cured from cancer without any side effects.

Antineoplastons are naturally occurring in blood and urine of healthy people so it is not toxic. Seems like the fda is already on this site suppressing this

 

[Radagast]

So you didn’t watch the video where it clearly shows that patient after patient was cured from cancer without any side effects.

Youtube videos are almost always collection of lies and deceit. Don't believe videos.

I posted links to information on side effects.

Antineoplastons are naturally occurring in blood and urine of healthy people so it is not toxic.

Formaldehyde is naturally occurring in the blood of healthy people. It's still toxic.

 

[tatumsid]

Youtube videos are almost always collection of lies and deceit. Don't believe videos.

I posted links to information on side effects.



Formaldehyde is naturally occurring in the blood of healthy people. It's still toxic.

If you look at the side effects, it’s nothing compared to chemo or radiation. These side effects are common even with vitamins

 

[Radagast]

If you look at the side effects, it’s nothing compared to chemo or radiation.

So you're admitting the side-effects now?

And chemo or radiation therapy actually works.

 

[tatumsid]

So you're admitting the side-effects now?

And chemo or radiation therapy actually works.

There are very rare and limited side effects. Even foods can have side effects.

Actually many people opt for Antineoplastons after chemo and radiation didn’t work. Antineoplastons have worked where conventional medicine didn’t.

Are you saying all those people lied in the congressional meetings ?

 

[VirOptimus]

Everyone must take a stand against the evils caused by money.

Take this to the conspiracy subforum.

 

[tatumsid]

Why is it a conspiracy? Clear evidence that Antineoplastons work and clear evidence and the FDA is perceived to be on a witch hunt. Congressional meetings and patient testimony is not a conspiracy

 

[VirOptimus]

Why is it a conspiracy? Clear evidence that Antineoplastons work and clear evidence and the FDA is perceived to be on a witch hunt. Congressional meetings and patient testimony is not a conspiracy

Because its tinfoil hat conspiracy nonsense.

There are no evidence and no FDA witch hunt.

Learn to value your sources.

 

[tatumsid]

Because its tinfoil hat conspiracy nonsense.

There are no evidence and no FDA witch hunt.

Learn to value your sources.

So witness testimony is no longer considered evidence? Court documents stating that the efficacy of the drug is not an issue is not considered evidence. 5 separate grand juries with no finding of fault is not evidence?

What do you accept as evidence?

 

[VirOptimus]

So witness testimony is no longer considered evidence? Court documents stating that the efficacy of the drug is not an issue is not considered evidence. 5 separate grand juries with no finding of fault is not evidence?

What do you accept as evidence?

I stand by my post.

 

[essentialsaltes]

What do you accept as evidence?

When we are talking about medical treatment, the standard is typically double-blinded randomized clinical trials.

Dr. Burzynski (the main promoter of antineoplastons) does not have a good track record when it comes to either 1) evidence from clinical trials or 2) adherence to ethical practices.

 

[tatumsid]

When we are talking about medical treatment, the standard is typically double-blinded randomized clinical trials.

Dr. Burzynski (the main promoter of antineoplastons) does not have a good track record when it comes to either 1) evidence from clinical trials or 2) adherence to ethical practices.

Phase 2 clinical trials were done and were successful. Many compassionate care patients went to him for last resort. Again, the witness testimony of several patients ranging from the 1980s till today vouch for this treatment. Can all these people be wrong?

How many deaths occurred due to antineoplaston treatment. The police officer testifying stated the autopsy showed it was the radiation treatment that killed his daughter, not the cancer. The antineoplaston treatment made her cancer free.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Phase 2 clinical trials were done and were successful.

According to the National Cancer Institute, as of April 2013, "no phase III randomized, controlled trials of antineoplastons as a treatment for cancer have been conducted.

Again, the witness testimony of several patients ranging from the 1980s till today vouch for this treatment. Can all these people be wrong?

Wrong about what? Even if I grant that person A had cancer, used antineoplastons as their only treatment, and got better, that does not mean the treatment is safe or effective. That's why we need to know the full results of all trials, and compare it to the results of other therapies.

 

[pitabread]

Again, the witness testimony of several patients ranging from the 1980s till today vouch for this treatment. Can all these people be wrong?

Ah hoc claims don't mean much. Especially in light of both confirmation bias and survivorship bias.

 

[tatumsid]

Ah hoc claims don't mean much. Especially in light of both confirmation bias and survivorship bias.

oh ok. So the fact that no one was challenging efficacy was also confirmation bias. Did I mention the police officer's daughter did not survive.

 

[tatumsid]

Phase 2 clinical trials were done and were successful. Many compassionate care patients went to him for last resort. Again, the witness testimony of several patients ranging from the 1980s till today vouch for this treatment. Can all these people be wrong?

How many deaths occurred due to antineoplaston treatment. The police officer testifying stated the autopsy showed it was the radiation treatment that killed his daughter, not the cancer. The antineoplaston treatment made her cancer free.

So the phase 2 studies already documented was not acknowledged. Phase II study of antineoplaston A10 and AS2-1 in patients with recurrent diffuse intrinsic brain stem glioma: a preliminary report. - PubMed - NCBI

Dr states live on Larry King that’s phase 2 was conducted but many doctors choose not to acknowledge it.