not sure if this is the correct part of the forum or if I am going about it the right way due to not being around these parts for long.
I propose a debate with anyone who would like to support the case for an evolving brain,
flexibility on a "historical" starting point is fine with me,
as are both organic and psychological citations.
I would also propose a layman's description of evidence along side the offered evidence so as not to lose the casual observers interest or understanding.
finally due to the vastness and complexity of the subject I am happy to split between the organic and psychological areas (for example best of three on each and then best of three including both),
or a longer debate involving both areas (for example best of five).
this would make a hugely fascinating debate in my opinion,
(what happens now ?)
I propose a debate with anyone who would like to support the case for an evolving brain,
flexibility on a "historical" starting point is fine with me,
as are both organic and psychological citations.
I would also propose a layman's description of evidence along side the offered evidence so as not to lose the casual observers interest or understanding.
finally due to the vastness and complexity of the subject I am happy to split between the organic and psychological areas (for example best of three on each and then best of three including both),
or a longer debate involving both areas (for example best of five).
this would make a hugely fascinating debate in my opinion,
(what happens now ?)