The evidence for Evolution.

[Subduction Zone]

Prove it.

I have many times. I will gladly do so again. Whenever you are ready. Just don't run away like you have in the past.

None of it..ever actually. Dream on.

dad, you know that is not true. But we can go over that too, once we get the flood taken care of.

Thank heaven for spam I guess?

Yes, you are an endless source of spam. Too bad that we can't feed the poor with your posts.

Are you ready?

 

[Subduction Zone]

The evo dream team can band together and pretend they know something...but just can never post it. Behold what you are reduced to.

dad, once again, you know that is not true.

If you do not understand something the correct way to behave is to ask questions politely and properly.

 

[dad]

I have many times. I will gladly do so again.

I haven't seen it. Maybe beg someone else to have you post it. I know better than to think you could.

dad, you know that is not true. But we can go over that too, once we get the flood taken care of.

We know. you have great wonders to post...but we'll never actually see anything but pitiful spam posts.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I haven't seen it. Maybe beg someone else to have you post it. I know better than to think you could.

That is only because you ignore it, don't understand it, or run away from it.

Please stop running away.

We know. you have great wonders to post...but we'll never actually see anything but pitiful spam posts.

dad, please, no more false claims. You are the one that posts spam and runs. You are running away once again.

dad, when you run away you announce to the whole world that you lost.

 

[dad]

That is only because you ignore it, don't understand it, or run away from it.

Please stop running away.



dad, please, no more false claims. You are the one that posts spam and runs. You are running away once again.

dad, when you run away you announce to the whole world that you lost.

Were we talking about a pic you posted as evidence but provided no facts about it? How would anyone run from that?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Were we talking about a pic you posted as evidence but provided no facts about it? How would anyone run from that?

Don't you mean "Why would anyone run away from that?" Which you did. A person must have been full of fear to do that.

So why did you run away from that discussion?

 

[Kylie]

Radioactive decay is more exciting than most of your posts. Neither your posts nor radioactivity as we know it now can be proven to have existed in the early days of man.

YAWN

That's the same claim you've been making for ages now. Still have not seen a shred of evidence to support it.

 

[dad]

YAWN

That's the same claim you've been making for ages now. Still have not seen a shred of evidence to support it.

? How would the bible support radiation existing in Adam's day or Noah's day the exact way it now does? How would science support radiation having existed till the KT layer? Or genetics? Let's see what you got.

 

[Kylie]

? How would the bible support radiation existing in Adam's day or Noah's day the exact way it now does? How would science support radiation having existed till the KT layer? Or genetics? Let's see what you got.

Is this really the best you've got?

"The Bible doesn't say it WASN'T a different state past, therefore I am right!"

That's a pretty pathetic argument.

 

[AV1611VET]

That's a pretty pathetic argument.

Whatever you want to call it,* it was different back then.

No death, no pain, no scars, no weeds, no thorns, no thistles, no disease, no sin, and probably a host of other "nos" that weren't documented.

* In dispensation theology, it is called: the dispensation of Innocence.

 

[dad]

Is this really the best you've got?

"The Bible doesn't say it WASN'T a different state past, therefore I am right!"

That's a pretty pathetic argument.

No, the bible describes a future and past that in no way fits modern physics. Science knows nothing else but present state laws. I am saying science, and you, do not know. Act accordingly.

 

[VirOptimus]

No, the bible describes a future and past that in no way fits modern physics. Science knows nothing else but present state laws. I am saying science, and you, do not know. Act accordingly.

Sceince is a tool to describe physicqal reality.

If you posit that there are more than physical reality its up to you to support that claim, as you cant well, its all hot air.

 

[dad]

Sceince is a tool to describe physicqal reality.

If you posit that there are more than physical reality its up to you to support that claim, as you cant well, its all hot air.

You forget it has described the future and past based on the physical realities of the present. That is not reality it is faith. Not unless you prove a same state future and past, and you can't.

 

[VirOptimus]

You forget it has described the future and past based on the physical realities of the present. That is not reality it is faith. Not unless you prove a same state future and past, and you can't.

No, thats not true.

You should realky learn the meaning of faith and also what physical reality really entails.

 

[dad]

No, thats not true.

You should realky learn the meaning of faith and also what physical reality really entails.

Yes it is absolutely true. Claiming the future or far past had or will have the same forces and laws in place is purest blind faith and nothing in this world but faith.

 

[VirOptimus]

Yes it is absolutely true. Claiming the future or far past had or will have the same forces and laws in place is purest blind faith and nothing in this world but faith.

You repeating nonsense doesnt make you any points or any less wrong.

 

[dad]

You repeating nonsense doesnt make you any points or any less wrong.

You calling truth nonsense and offering no evidence that opposes it doesn't have value.

 

[VirOptimus]

You calling truth nonsense and offering no evidence that opposes it doesn't have value.

No, I'm calling your assertions nonsense.

Physical reality is pretty well understood.

 

[AV1611VET]

Physical reality is pretty well understood.

Uh-huh.

Is that why scientists have theories, hypotheses, speculations, peer reviews, and monumental errors to their credit?

Under the guise of this pretty-well-understood physical reality, how did we get our moon?

 

[dad]

dad, once again, you know that is not true.

If you do not understand something the correct way to behave is to ask questions politely and properly.

if you don't comprehend you offered a pic with no explanation as evidence, we'll let the lurkers judge you.