LBAM:
I really like you, because I see that you are debating and arguing with the right intentions. You want to do what is right and stand up for the oppressed - and the fact that you're spending time on a Christian board in standing up for your beliefs needs to be noted as an indicator that this topic is very important to you and that you are willing to devote a lot of time in trying to convince or persuade those who do not share your opinion. I want you to know that I respect and appreciate it - I only fear that you have the best of intentions and yet are ideologically blinded at the same time.
I will try to argue and reason with you, but I want to take time to point out one quote of you. I asked you about what you think justifies the slaughter of civillians - what qualifies as an "attack on Islam" that justifies Jihad against the unbelievers.
Your answer was that you do not answer these types of questions:
You should know that I don't answer these types of questions either way because I don't like to encourage the entrapment culture.
I just want to say that the way Islam is perceived in the West is fundamentally changing with every conflict in the Middle East, with every time that citizens here recognize that every country that borders the Muslim world is riddled by war and terror.
While I have, for a long time, considered these to be acts of rogue idiots who abuse their religion for crime, I have been coming to the conclusion that these acts are condoned and furthered by the "religion" itself and constitute beliefs held by nearly everyone who follows this ideology.
After all, I see thousands hitting the streets to demonstrate against "World Jewdom" and no demonstrations that distance themselves from ISIS or other terror groups. And when I ask Muslims what they think of these acts, they seemingly have no interest in discussion these issues. Or, they do, and say that "joining Al Qaeda is just like joining the Army - what is the problem with it?!".
Your unwillingness to actually speak on the subject only fuels resentment and prejudice. I am sure that a varying amount of Christians only rarely speak to other Muslims and the fact that you are on this website is a great opportunity to provide for some interfaith dialogue - but sadly, I have the feeling you are actually providing
more indication that your religion qualifies more as a political ideology than actual faith than discrediting these points.
Ok, and which area was attacked based on the lie that Hamas captured an Israeli soldier after the 72-hour ceasefire started? Rafah. Which tunnels were Israelis saying that the IDF were detonating after the start of the ceasefire (before Israel finally admitted that the Israeli soldier was killed before the ceasefire began)? The ones in Rafah. And why were they still detonating tunnels after the ceasefire began? Because ceasefires apparently are only binding on Palestinians and not Israelis.
Israel has offered peace since the dawn of its time - it was the Palestinians that refused to accept any two-state-solution they offered.
Wasn't it just 10 years ago that Arafat turned down a deal that actually provided him with 98% of the demands he proposed?
Well, the entire region is occupied, but Gaza and the West Bank are occupied even according to most of the international world.
The West Bank has Jewish settlement, yes. But the rockets weren't flying from the West Bank now, were they?
And how is Gaza occupied? You brought up links that describe the fact that Gazas borders are closed and that their airspace is controlled.
Does Israel not have a right to close its borders if they are used for terrorist attacks? Before the border, do you remember the time when suicide bombings in Israel were just part of the daily routine? Was that okay?
List of Palestinian suicide attacks - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
That number dropped after the borders were constructed. Since when does a country NOT have the right to close its borders?
And as for "electronic airspace" - you mean that radio frequencies are "occupied"? Heck, you have that in any country in the world. That's why there are electronic administrations for that.
"Airspace occupation"? How is this a problem?
If these "occupations" justify the slaughter of civillians and cannot be solved by political dialogue, then something is going terribly wrong.
The numbers back up the fact that Israel targets non-combatants (like those on the beach, in hospitals, UN shelters, etc.) and that Hamas has been targeting Israeli combatants (like the ones they killed in face-to-face combat when they got to an Israeli base through tunnels).
The numbers are a result of the Iron dome and do not reflect the willingness of Muslim terror groups to kill civillians.
We can see this trend when we look at casualties from pre-Iron-Dome and pre-Border-Fence eras.
They can still be a part of it after they've been invaded, exiled, and killed in their own land and are deprived of even their right to self-defense? My, how nice of the Israelis.
They have the Gaza strip and the majority of the West Bank. If they want a state, then they should act like adults and enter political dialogue. Secular Fatah seems to be able to pull it off - why not islamic Hamas?
Certainly not the entity that is collectively punishing an entire people because they voted for the wrong party (i.e. Hamas) and kills thousands of non-combatant civilians every few years.
Punishment would entail indiscriminately bombing the populace.
Bombing rocket ramps and Hamas facilities does not qualify as indiscriminate bombing.
If Hamas doesn't want to be bombed to dust and wants to help its populace, then it should cease firing rockets into Israel.
No, they just lie about their massacre of the Palestinians to justify their attacks to garner media and world support. And then they show pictures of poor little children being frightened in bomb shelters while ignoring that they tear apart the limbs of poor little children in Gaza to drive up media sympathy.
Sure. Hamas is honest and Israel lies. You say this because Hamas is Muslim and Israel are unbelievers?
When both parties claim the truth, then it's nice to look at the actual profit of war. Israel does not profit - it's a costly operation and an economy of Israel would much rather profit from a strong economic partner in Gaza and the West Bank.
Hamas, on the other hand, uses this perpetual state of war to cool their own religious lust for death and also to keep themselves in power.
Israel is the one that breaks ceasefires consistently because it does not have a problem with going back on its word.
Hamas broke all the cease fire agreements in this conflict. Even Arab news outlets have been reluctantly reporting this fact.
Did you even watch the video? The massacre in Shuja'iyah killed more than 65 civilians without a warning.
Actually there WERE warnings asking them to clear the area and steer free from it after bombing runs.
I'll just quote what I said elsewhere on this forum: Even if there is ample warning, where exactly are they supposed to go? Gaza is barricaded from all sides - land, sea, and air - so they can't really leave.
Within Gaza itself, no place is safe. Not their homes, not the beach, not playgrounds, not hospitals, and certainly not schools where people are seeking shelter. No where.
Israel has told the populace of the North to evacuate to the South when they performed bombing runs there.
Gaza is small, but we both know it is not a "giant prison with nowhere to hide".
It does not call for the extermination of all Jews. And even if it did, again, the numbers point more to the fact that the IDF is a terrorist organization.
The time will not come until Muslims will fight the Jews (and kill them); until the Jews hide behind rocks and trees, which will cry: O Muslim! there is a Jew hiding behind me, come on and kill him! This will not apply to the Gharqad, which is a Jewish tree
Seriously, read the charter.
Palestine Center - The Charter of the Hamas
In closing: free your mind. How does Israel profit from this ongoing conflict? Why disengage from Gaza and then go back in 9 years later? Why spend 100.000 on every rocket that's fired from Hamas?
Try to think rationally instead of swallowing what you are taught. If Allah is loving, then he would not advocate the killing of unbelievers.
I do hope you have a chance to read what Jesus teaches about those who persecute you - maybe you will find that it is more Godly than those primordial human instincts that tell us to kill those who attack us of the Mohammedan ideology.