The Destruction of Jerusalem - George Peter Holford, 1805AD
Proof that Matthew 24 was fully fulfilled in 70 AD!
The claim above comes from someone who did not read Holford's book.
.
Upvote
0
The Destruction of Jerusalem - George Peter Holford, 1805AD
Proof that Matthew 24 was fully fulfilled in 70 AD!
BABerean2 said: ↑
There is a direct link between modern Dispensational Theology, and modern Zionism.
Orthodox Jewish Zionist Samuel Untermeyer, helped C.I. Scofield get the Scofield Reference Bible published.And the rest is history.
Hello mkgal. I did a google search on the Geneva Bible vs the Scofield Bible and came up with some interesting links and history concerning those. [I use Young's Literal Translation. Rotherham's is also a good literal translation, but a little awkward to read for newer Christians]mkgal1 said: ↑
I agree. My point, that I'm trying to make, is that this theology wasn't born overnight. It began (from what I can tell) when Darby and Newton were still united and the teaching is shown, in its infancy, in the notes in the Geneva Study Bible.
I'm thinking the root has to do with humanity's tendency for Nationalism - which is what Jesus was warning those in His generation against (as it was the Nationalism
of the zealots that led Jerusalem away from Christ - blinding them in their desire to take.......
search "geneva bible vs scofield bible"Revelation 1:1
Stephens 1550 Textus Receptus
apokaluyiV ihsou cristou hn edwken autw o qeoV deixai toiV douloiV autou a dei genesqai en tacei kai eshmanen aposteilaV dia tou aggelou autou tw doulw autou iwannh
Scrivener 1894 Textus Receptus
apokaluyiV ihsou cristou hn edwken autw o qeoV deixai toiV douloiV autou a dei genesqai en tacei kai eshmanen aposteilaV dia tou aggelou autou tw doulw autou iwannh
Byzantine Majority
apokaluyiV ihsou cristou hn edwken autw o qeoV deixai toiV douloiV autou a dei genesqai en tacei kai eshmanen aposteilaV dia tou aggelou autou tw doulw autou iwannh
Alexandrian
apokaluyiV ihsou cristou hn edwken autw o qeoV deixai toiV douloiV autou a dei genesqai en tacei kai eshmanen aposteilaV dia tou aggelou autou tw doulw autou iwannh
Hort and Westcott
apokaluyiV ihsou cristou hn edwken autw o qeoV deixai toiV douloiV autou a dei genesqai en tacei kai eshmanen aposteilaV dia tou aggelou autou tw doulw autou iwannh
===================
Revelation 1:1 This is the revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show His servants what must soon come to pass. He made it known by sending His angel to His servant John,
Latin Vulgate
1:1 apocalypsis Iesu Christi quam dedit illi Deus palam facere servis suis quae oportet fieri cito et significavit mittens per angelum suum servo suo Iohanni
King James Version
1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified [it] by his angel unto his servant John:
American Standard Version
1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show unto his servants, even the things which must shortly come to pass: and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John;
Bible in Basic English
1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave him so that his servants might have knowledge of the things which will quickly take place: and he sent and made it clear by his angel to his servant John;
Darby's English Translation
1:1 Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave to him, to shew to his bondmen what must shortly take place; and he signified it, sending by his angel, to his bondman John,
Douay Rheims
1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to make known to his servants the things which must shortly come to pass: and signified, sending by his angel to his servant John,
Noah Webster Bible
1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave to him, to show to his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel to his servant John:
Weymouth New Testament
1:1 The revelation given by Jesus Christ, which God granted Him, that He might make known to His servants certain events which must shortly come to pass: and He sent His angel and communicated it to His servant John.
World English Bible
1:1 This is the Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his servants the things which must happen soon, which he sent and made known by his angel to his servant, John,
Young's Literal Translation
1:1 A revelation of Jesus Christ, that God gave to him, to shew to his servants what things it behoveth to come to pass quickly; and he did signify it, having sent through his messenger to his servant John,
That belief does belong to the dispensational/futurist theology. So whether you're offended by being in that group or not - that is believing a key tenet of dispensational teaching.
mkgal1 said: ↑
That belief does belong to the dispensational/futurist theology. So whether you're offended by being in that group or not - that is believing a key tenet of dispensational teaching.
Then there is 2 Peter 3:12 concerning 1st century Armageddon/Gog-Magog war.....Not based on the scripture found below. We are gathered on the day of His Second Coming.
He then burns up this rotten, sin-cursed world, bringing in the New Heavens, and the New Earth.
2Pe 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
.
Debunking requires actually demonstrating that something is incorrect. You have alleged this. But you have not demonstrated it. For you cannot. What has been actually and thoroughly debunked here is the false accusations you keep pressing against Dispensationalists.Your claims about Watson's book have been thoroughly debunked on this forum.
I bought Watson's book, because you recommended it.
Watson claimed those who saw the Church being removed before the final conflagration were Dispensationalists.
I believe the same thing, and am in no way a promoter of modern Dispensational Theology.
You have claimed to understand the importance of the New Covenant, but have failed to produce even one line from any of your books about the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34.
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, modern Dispensational Theology falls apart, and the pretrib removal of the Church falls with it.
.
mkgal1 said:That belief does belong to the dispensational/futurist theology. So whether you're offended by being in that group or not - that is believing a key tenet of dispensational teaching.
The Scriptures don't address different schools of theological interpretation.Not based on the scripture found below.
......and it lines up with the dispensational interpretation.BABerean2 said:We are gathered on the day of His Second Coming.
He then burns up this rotten, sin-cursed world, bringing in the New Heavens, and the New Earth.
Debunking requires actually demonstrating that something is incorrect. You have alleged this. But you have not demonstrated it. For you cannot. What has been actually and thoroughly debunked here is the false accusations you keep pressing against Dispensationalists.
The Scriptures don't address different schools of theological interpretation.
Why and who are you asking? You didn't quote anyone.....If you can show an earlier source which taught that modern Jews will come to salvation outside of the Church, please do so.
.
A few sites:Rev 14:12 Here is endurance of the Saints/Christians: here are those keeping the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.'
You're starting with a filter and reading Scripture through that lens (we all do). What's revealed is what's been pointed out to us (typically) through commentary.The errors of "different schools of theological interpretation" are revealed by the scripture their proponents must ignore to make their doctrine work.
The whole of scripture reveals them for what they really are.
.
Explain to us, BABerean, your belief of the removal of the Church prior to "the final conflagration" and how that is NOT in alignment with a two people of God theology, please.
BABerean2 said:Watson claimed those who saw the Church being removed before the final conflagration were Dispensationalists.
I believe the same thing, and am in no way a promoter of modern Dispensational Theology.
Honestly - looking at all of this is new to me (within the last year) but, ISTM, that a large part of our schisms in theology has to do with political struggles of the past. The Franciscan order of the Catholic church and the Greek Orthodox Church have seemed to have avoided a lot of the effects of the political power struggles.
These are the two main divisions I see in interpretation of the Scriptures (Futurism and Preterism). Sides were taken in this issue of the [false] interpretation that was being taught unanimously by reformation preachers in the late 1500's that identified the papal system as the Antichrist, and the Roman Church as Babylon. That caused a counter narrative to be formed - and interpretations of Revelation, Ezekiel, and the Book of Daniel were all tampered with and moved away from the original way our early church had interpreted them.
That seems to be the case.At the Council of Trent the Papacy came up with a Counter-Reformation.
Both the Preterism of Alcazar, and the Futurism of Riberra, were designed to take the focus off of the Papacy.
.
And who could blame it. Seems everyone and their mother saw the Papacy/Rome/Vatican as being in Revelation.At the Council of Trent the Papacy came up with a Counter-Reformation.
Both the Preterism of Alcazar, and the Futurism of Riberra, were designed to take the focus off of the Papacy.
.
M L...............What would society be like today?
But I suppose if not for the bravery of the Protestant Reformation, we would be under the Roman Papacy and Catholicism. Who knows...........
LittleLambofJesus said: ↑
But I suppose if not for the bravery of the Protestant Reformation, we would be under the Roman Papacy and Catholicism. Who knows...........
Perhaps. The Dark Ages/Middle Ages were indeed trying times for Christians accused of heresy and not conforming to Rome's Papacy.No reason to believe it wouldn't have been more of this.
Estimates of the Number Killed by the PAPACY in the Middle Ages and Later
CHAPTER 1. Examples of figures concerning the number killed
CHAPTER 2. The plausibility of massive persecution
CHAPTER 3. The 50 Million Figure
CHAPTER 4. The Spanish Inquisition
CHAPTER 5. Alethia's estimate
CHAPTER 6. An estimate based on population growth
CHAPTER 7. Indirect evidence of persecution
CHAPTER 8. Cloistered convents
CHAPTER 9. Wars
CHAPTER 10. Conclusion
Was God behind the great Schism of 1054?For the love of all that is holy people, drop the bigotry and villianizations!
Our Lord's critique of the Pharisees was based on a view of the law that lacked any attention to the intentions behind our good deeds, and their ethnocentric form of Judaism that strictly seperated Jews and Gentiles- something highly inappropriate and indeed damning in the new era.
That is not what Catholics do! Haven't you ever read St. Thomas Aquinas? Do you even know what he is? According to Catholic doctrine, derived from the Scriptures, good works that lack right intentions are worthless.
Or do you just wish to villianize Christian traditions that practice formal liturgies in their worship and sacramental forms of piety because you don't understand them and think they're just 'going through the motions'?
I wonder how many evangelicals are just 'going through the motions' when they 'give the Lord a big round of applause' or clap their hands to upbeat worship music.
Seriously, I find that whole line of argument highly offense.
Can you answer the question in post number 211?
most Preterists/Amills have never believed in that Futuristic nonsense, but mostly saw 1st century Jerusalem as being in Revelation 18........[as do I and many others]
So you believe He comes again to collect His church and on the way out torches the rest of His creation (non-believing people included)?Based on 1 Thessalonians chapters 4, and 5, and 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10, and 2 Peter 3:10-13, the Church is gathered by Christ on the same day as the final conflagration, at His Second Coming.
.