The Dangerous Confusion & Delusion In Dispensationalism & Christian Zionism Doctrines

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
BABerean2 said:
There is a direct link between modern Dispensational Theology, and modern Zionism.

Orthodox Jewish Zionist Samuel Untermeyer, helped C.I. Scofield get the Scofield Reference Bible published.And the rest is history.
mkgal1 said:
I agree. My point, that I'm trying to make, is that this theology wasn't born overnight. It began (from what I can tell) when Darby and Newton were still united and the teaching is shown, in its infancy, in the notes in the Geneva Study Bible.

I'm thinking the root has to do with humanity's tendency for Nationalism - which is what Jesus was warning those in His generation against (as it was the Nationalism
of the zealots that led Jerusalem away from Christ - blinding them in their desire to take.......
Hello mkgal. I did a google search on the Geneva Bible vs the Scofield Bible and came up with some interesting links and history concerning those. [I use Young's Literal Translation. Rotherham's is also a good literal translation, but a little awkward to read for newer Christians]
I also compare the major Greek texts that various Bible versions use.......
Greek New Testament - Parallel Greek New Testament by John Hurt
Revelation 1:1

Stephens 1550 Textus Receptus
apokaluyiV ihsou cristou hn edwken autw o qeoV deixai toiV douloiV autou a dei genesqai en tacei kai eshmanen aposteilaV dia tou aggelou autou tw doulw autou iwannh
Scrivener 1894 Textus Receptus
apokaluyiV ihsou cristou hn edwken autw o qeoV deixai toiV douloiV autou a dei genesqai en tacei kai eshmanen aposteilaV dia tou aggelou autou tw doulw autou iwannh
Byzantine Majority
apokaluyiV ihsou cristou hn edwken autw o qeoV deixai toiV douloiV autou a dei genesqai en tacei kai eshmanen aposteilaV dia tou aggelou autou tw doulw autou iwannh
Alexandrian
apokaluyiV ihsou cristou hn edwken autw o qeoV deixai toiV douloiV autou a dei genesqai en tacei kai eshmanen aposteilaV dia tou aggelou autou tw doulw autou iwannh
Hort and Westcott
apokaluyiV ihsou cristou hn edwken autw o qeoV deixai toiV douloiV autou a dei genesqai en tacei kai eshmanen aposteilaV dia tou aggelou autou tw doulw autou iwannh
===================
Revelation 1:1 This is the revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show His servants what must soon come to pass. He made it known by sending His angel to His servant John,

Latin Vulgate
1:1 apocalypsis Iesu Christi quam dedit illi Deus palam facere servis suis quae oportet fieri cito et significavit mittens per angelum suum servo suo Iohanni
King James Version
1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified [it] by his angel unto his servant John:
American Standard Version
1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show unto his servants, even the things which must shortly come to pass: and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John;
Bible in Basic English
1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave him so that his servants might have knowledge of the things which will quickly take place: and he sent and made it clear by his angel to his servant John;
Darby's English Translation
1:1 Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave to him, to shew to his bondmen what must shortly take place; and he signified it, sending by his angel, to his bondman John,
Douay Rheims
1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to make known to his servants the things which must shortly come to pass: and signified, sending by his angel to his servant John,
Noah Webster Bible
1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave to him, to show to his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel to his servant John:
Weymouth New Testament
1:1 The revelation given by Jesus Christ, which God granted Him, that He might make known to His servants certain events which must shortly come to pass: and He sent His angel and communicated it to His servant John.
World English Bible
1:1 This is the Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his servants the things which must happen soon, which he sent and made known by his angel to his servant, John,

Young's Literal Translation
1:1 A revelation of Jesus Christ, that God gave to him, to shew to his servants what things it behoveth to come to pass quickly; and he did signify it, having sent through his messenger to his servant John,
search "geneva bible vs scofield bible"
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-ab&sxsrf=ACYBGNQ2DI09nhsZ8GvhWytKftB-cbSnMg:1570292879119&source=hp&ei=j8SYXZ7QBIeqtQW84ZbYCw&q=geneva+bible+vs+scofield+bible&oq=geneva+bible+vs+scofield+bible&gs_l=psy-ab.3..33i299j33i160.1929.15792..16298...0.0..0.300.3202.14j14j1j1......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i131j0j35i39j0i22i30j33i22i29i30.H1rO-Emy0Z0&ved=0ahUKEwje04DqxIXlAhUHVa0KHbywBbsQ4dUDCAc&uact=5
========================
The Reformed Reader introduction to the geneva bible for the historic Baptist faith.
For the last three centuries Protestants have fancied themselves the heirs of the Reformation, the Puritans, the Calvinists, and the Pilgrims who landed at Plymouth Rock. This assumption is one of history's greatest ironies. Today's Protestants laboring under that assumption use the King James Bible. Most of the newer Bibles such as the Revised Standard Version are simply updates of the King James.

The irony is that none of the groups named in the preceding paragraph used a King James Bible nor would they have used it if it had been given to them free. The Bible in use by those groups until it went out of print in 1644, was the Geneva Bible. The first Geneva Bible, both Old and New Testaments, was first published in English in 1560 in what is now Geneva, Switzerland,* William Shakespeare, John Bunyan, John Milton, the Pilgrims who landed on Plymouth Rock in 1620, and other luminaries of that era used the Geneva Bible exclusively.

Until he had his own version named after him, so did King James I of England. James I later tried to disclaim any knowledge of the Geneva Bible, though he quotes the Geneva Bible in his own writing, As a Professor Eadie reported it:.......................

During the 16th Century and the one preceding it, the Spanish Empire, a colossus larger than the Roman Empire, had been unable to stamp out the Reformation with the world's finest and most well equipped armies. The Spaniards needn't have bothered. What the armies of Catholic Spain were unable to make a dent in, one sadistic sodomite, James I, did with a pair of censoring scissors.

The Reformation, and the blood of millions who fought for it, apparently went for nothing. Protestant churches of today hardly resemble the churches of the Reformation.

Today's preachers study the Scofield Reference Edition of the King James, a volume that contains marginal notes that would seem no more accurate to John Calvin and John Knox than Mother Goose. The blind are once more leading the blind. This reprinted edition of the 1599.

Geneva Bible is probably the last sputtering flame of the Reformation. The works of John Milton, John Calvin, John Knox, George Buchanan, William Tyndale, and the rest can still be found on the shelves in the public libraries. Such works are checked out by uninterested college students on an average of about one volume every ten years, no one in today's churches reads them.

==============================
An interesting discussion on the Geneva vs Scofield Bibles...........

Geneva/Scofield Study Bible Comparison

Does anyone know if there has ever been a study done comparing the notes of the Geneva Bible with the Scofield Bible? I am taking a class next semester (Christian Thought 1 & 2) and am thinking of doing a research paper on some of the differences in the notes (should the professor allow it). Of course, I would have to narrow my paper to a few key passages (Gen. 1, for example) for the sake of time and paper length.

Just wanted to do a preliminary check to see if anyone knew of any existing papers/studies. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: mkgal1
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That belief does belong to the dispensational/futurist theology. So whether you're offended by being in that group or not - that is believing a key tenet of dispensational teaching.

Not based on the scripture found below.

We are gathered on the day of His Second Coming.
He then burns up this rotten, sin-cursed world, bringing in the New Heavens, and the New Earth.


2Th 1:7 And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels,
2Th 1:8 In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ:
2Th 1:9 Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power;
2Th 1:10 When he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe (because our testimony among you was believed) in that day.


2Pe 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
2Pe 3:11 Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness,
2Pe 3:12 Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?
2Pe 3:13 Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.

.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
mkgal1 said:
That belief does belong to the dispensational/futurist theology. So whether you're offended by being in that group or not - that is believing a key tenet of dispensational teaching.
Not based on the scripture found below. We are gathered on the day of His Second Coming.
He then burns up this rotten, sin-cursed world, bringing in the New Heavens, and the New Earth.

2Pe 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
.
Then there is 2 Peter 3:12 concerning 1st century Armageddon/Gog-Magog war.....

Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke's Temple/Jerusalem Discourses harmonized- Poll Thread
Matthew 24:
3 Yet of Him sitting on the Mount of the Olives, the Disciples came toward to Him according to own saying "be telling to us! when shall these be being? and what the sign of Thy parousia<3952> and full-consummation<4930> of the Age?

===============================
This verse in Peter is the only one that uses "day of God" which is used in only 2 verses of the entire Bible. [tho the phrase "the Day of the Lord" is used many times] and is used in Revelation concerning Armageddon/Gog-Magog............

Strong's Concordance with Hebrew and Greek Lexicon
"day of god" occurs 2 times in 2 verses in the NKJV.

2 Peter 3:12
toward expectation and hastening the parousian<3952> of the day of the God, by which heavens, being fired<1448> shall being dissolved/loosed<3089> dissolved, and elements being burned<2741> is being melted<5082>


Revelation 16:14
For they are spirits of demons, doing sings which is going out on the kings of the whole inhabited-house/land/oikoumenhV <3625>to be mobilizing/leading them into the battle of the great day of God Almighty.

======================================
You voted Armageddon and Gog-Magog are the same events.
The only difference is, I believe 1st century Jerusalem is showing in Revelation and you believe it is a future Jerusalem.......

Armegeddon and Gog-magog same event?
  1. *
    I view them as the same event
    17 vote(s)
    23.9%
  2. I view them as different events
    43 vote(s)
    60.6%
  3. I am not sure
    7 vote(s)
    9.9%
  4. Does it really matter?
    4 vote(s)
    5.6%
17 total votes.
 
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟531,725.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Your claims about Watson's book have been thoroughly debunked on this forum.

I bought Watson's book, because you recommended it.

Watson claimed those who saw the Church being removed before the final conflagration were Dispensationalists.
I believe the same thing, and am in no way a promoter of modern Dispensational Theology.

You have claimed to understand the importance of the New Covenant, but have failed to produce even one line from any of your books about the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34.

Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, modern Dispensational Theology falls apart, and the pretrib removal of the Church falls with it.


.
Debunking requires actually demonstrating that something is incorrect. You have alleged this. But you have not demonstrated it. For you cannot. What has been actually and thoroughly debunked here is the false accusations you keep pressing against Dispensationalists.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: fwGod
Upvote 0

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,339
7,349
California
✟551,233.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
mkgal1 said:
That belief does belong to the dispensational/futurist theology. So whether you're offended by being in that group or not - that is believing a key tenet of dispensational teaching.
Not based on the scripture found below.
The Scriptures don't address different schools of theological interpretation.

This is an interpretation... commentary:

BABerean2 said:
We are gathered on the day of His Second Coming.
He then burns up this rotten, sin-cursed world, bringing in the New Heavens, and the New Earth.
......and it lines up with the dispensational interpretation.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Debunking requires actually demonstrating that something is incorrect. You have alleged this. But you have not demonstrated it. For you cannot. What has been actually and thoroughly debunked here is the false accusations you keep pressing against Dispensationalists.


If you can show an earlier source which taught that modern Jews will come to salvation outside of the Church, please do so.



.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The Scriptures don't address different schools of theological interpretation.


The errors of "different schools of theological interpretation" are revealed by the scripture their proponents must ignore to make their doctrine work.

The whole of scripture reveals them for what they really are.

.
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
If you can show an earlier source which taught that modern Jews will come to salvation outside of the Church, please do so.
.
Why and who are you asking? You didn't quote anyone.....

1Th 5:9
For God did not appoint us to wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ,
2Ti 2:10
Therefore I endure all things for the sake of the elect, that they also may obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory.
2Ti 3:15
and that from childhood you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.

Gal 2:16
having known also that a man is not declared righteous by works of law, if not through the faith of Jesus Christ, also we in Christ Jesus did believe, that we might be declared righteous by the faith of Christ, and not by works of law, wherefore declared righteous by works of law shall be no flesh.'

1Pe 4:16
and if as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; and let him glorify God in this respect;
Rev 14:12 Here is endurance of the Saints/Christians: here are those keeping the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.'
A few sites:

Christian scholars say Jews can be saved without faith in Christ

An ecumenical group of Christian academicians announce radical departure from traditionally-held views of salvation.

Rejecting a centuries-old hall mark of Christian teaching on salvation, an ecumenical group of Christian scholars in September said Jews can be saved without coming to faith in Jesus Christ.

Claiming "Jews are in an eternal covenant with God," 21 members of the Christian Scholars Group on Christian-Jewish Relations challenged the traditional Christian view of Jesus as savior for all humankind. Because faithful Jews are already in right relationship with God, they said, "We renounce missionary efforts directed at converting Jews."

"We know there has been a long tradition of anti-Judaism within that Christian tradition," says Joseph Tyson, chair of the scholars group and professor emeritus at Southern Methodist University. "It's based on certain misperceptions of history, and it's theologically invalid ... We're convinced that a re-thinking of Christian attitudes toward Jews is central, indispensable and sacred."
=================
What “No Salvation Outside the Church” Means

Necessary for Salvation
As we have seen, God introduced salvation to the world through his chosen people, the Jews. God’s revelation to the Jews found its fulfillment in Christ, the Messiah, who established the Catholic Church. The grace necessary for salvation continues to come from Christ, through his Church. Those who innocently do not know and embrace this might still attain salvation but those who knowingly and willingly choose to reject it, reject salvation on God’s terms.

The Catechism (once again quoting Lumen Gentium) summarizes all this as follows:

Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation:
============================
New Vatican document reflects on relations between Catholics, Jews

Vatican City — Catholics are called to witness to their faith in Jesus before all people, including Jews, but the Catholic Church “neither conducts nor supports” any institutional missionary initiative directed toward Jews, says a new document from a Vatican commission.

How God will save the Jews if they do not explicitly believe in Christ is “an unfathomable divine mystery,” but one which must be affirmed since Catholics believe that God is faithful to his promises and therefore never revoked his covenant with the Jewish people, it says.

In the statement, “The Gifts and the Calling of God Are Irrevocable,” the Pontifical Commission for Religious Relations With the Jews gives thanks for 50 years of Catholic-Jewish dialogue and looks at some of the theological questions that have arisen in the dialogue and in Catholic theology since the Second Vatican Council.
=================================
Jewish People Do Not Need Jesus for Salvation | Jewish Voice Ministries International

Dual Covenant Theology teaches that Jewish People have a separate path to God through the Mosaic and Abrahamic Covenants. This too is false. The doctrine developed after the Holocaust when Christians thought the Jews had suffered enough and needed to be accepted and affirmed. Although well meaning, this is a very dangerous lie.

Hear the important words of Jonathan Bernis on this lie:
As I was growing up, whenever someone tried to share the Gospel with me, my first response was always, “I’m Jewish.” And then I always received an apology. By apologizing for sharing the Gospel with me, what these well-meaning, born-again, evangelical Christians were doing was reinforcing the lie that Jesus is not for the Jews.

Jesus Himself said, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me” (John 14:6 TLV).

The declaration in Acts 4:12: “There is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved,” makes it clear that salvation is through Yeshua alone, for all— Jew and Gentile alike.

Messianic Judaism, or the use of the term “Jewish Christianity,” is not the lie here. The lie is that Jewish People have a different way apart from faith in Yeshua. Jews who believe in Jesus remain Jews, always and forever, but the Bible presents that there is no other way to reach the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob but through His Anointed Messiah, Yeshua.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,339
7,349
California
✟551,233.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
The errors of "different schools of theological interpretation" are revealed by the scripture their proponents must ignore to make their doctrine work.

The whole of scripture reveals them for what they really are.

.
You're starting with a filter and reading Scripture through that lens (we all do). What's revealed is what's been pointed out to us (typically) through commentary.

But this discussion isn't about comparing Scripture to schools of interpretation. It's about what falls into the dispensational framework - and the rapture is all a key part of futurism/dispensationalism.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,339
7,349
California
✟551,233.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Explain to us, BABerean, your belief of the removal of the Church prior to "the final conflagration" and how that is NOT in alignment with a two people of God theology, please.

You'd posted that:

BABerean2 said:
Watson claimed those who saw the Church being removed before the final conflagration were Dispensationalists.
I believe the same thing, and am in no way a promoter of modern Dispensational Theology.
 
Upvote 0

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,339
7,349
California
✟551,233.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Honestly - looking at all of this is new to me (within the last year) but, ISTM, that a large part of our schisms in theology has to do with political struggles of the past. The Franciscan order of the Catholic church and the Greek Orthodox Church have seemed to have avoided a lot of the effects of the political power struggles.

These are the two main divisions I see in interpretation of the Scriptures (Futurism and Preterism). Sides were taken in this issue of the [false] interpretation that was being taught unanimously by reformation preachers in the late 1500's that identified the papal system as the Antichrist, and the Roman Church as Babylon. That caused a counter narrative to be formed - and interpretations of Revelation, Ezekiel, and the Book of Daniel were all tampered with and moved away from the original way our early church had interpreted them.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Honestly - looking at all of this is new to me (within the last year) but, ISTM, that a large part of our schisms in theology has to do with political struggles of the past. The Franciscan order of the Catholic church and the Greek Orthodox Church have seemed to have avoided a lot of the effects of the political power struggles.

These are the two main divisions I see in interpretation of the Scriptures (Futurism and Preterism). Sides were taken in this issue of the [false] interpretation that was being taught unanimously by reformation preachers in the late 1500's that identified the papal system as the Antichrist, and the Roman Church as Babylon. That caused a counter narrative to be formed - and interpretations of Revelation, Ezekiel, and the Book of Daniel were all tampered with and moved away from the original way our early church had interpreted them.


At the Council of Trent the Papacy came up with a Counter-Reformation.

Both the Preterism of Alcazar, and the Futurism of Riberra, were designed to take the focus off of the Papacy.




.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,339
7,349
California
✟551,233.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
At the Council of Trent the Papacy came up with a Counter-Reformation.

Both the Preterism of Alcazar, and the Futurism of Riberra, were designed to take the focus off of the Papacy.




.
That seems to be the case.

Can you answer the question in post number 211?
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
At the Council of Trent the Papacy came up with a Counter-Reformation.

Both the Preterism of Alcazar, and the Futurism of Riberra, were designed to take the focus off of the Papacy.

.
And who could blame it. Seems everyone and their mother saw the Papacy/Rome/Vatican as being in Revelation.

As far as I know, most Preterists/Amills have never believed in that Futuristic nonsense, but mostly saw 1st century Jerusalem as being in Revelation 18........[as do I and many others]

But I suppose if not for the bravery of the Protestant Reformation, we would be under the Roman Papacy and Catholicism. Who knows...........

What if the Protestant reformation never happened?
What would society be like today?
M L...............

Martin Luther identifies the Antichrist over 500 years ago!

The quote copied below is from one of Martin Luther's last books. It was titled: "A Prelude by Martin Luther on the Babylonian Captivity of the Church".
Page 536, chapter 3.

"Nevertheless, since few know this glory of baptism and the blessedness of Christian liberty, and cannot know them because of the tyranny of the pope, I for one will walk away from it all and redeem my conscience by bringing this charge against the pope and all his papists:
Unless they will abolish their laws and traditions, and restore to Christ's churches their liberty and have it taught among them, they are guilty of all the souls that perish under this miserable captivity, and the papacy is truly the kingdom of Babylon, yes, the kingdom of the real Antichrist!
For who is " the man of sin" and "the son of perdition"
but he that with his doctrines and his laws increases sins and the perdition of souls in the Church, while he sits in the Church as if he were God?

All this the papal tyranny has fulfilled, and more than fulfilled, these many centuries. It has extinguished faith, obscured the sacraments and oppressed the Gospel."
========================
Tyndale and defying the Pope

William Tyndale


A clergyman hopelessly entrenched in Roman Catholic dogma once taunted Tyndale with the statement, “"We are better to be without God’s laws than the Pope’s”"

Tyndale was infuriated by such Roman Catholic heresies, and he replied,
I defy the Pope and all his laws. If God spare my life ere many years, I will cause the boy that drives the plow to know more of the scriptures than you!"”

Tyndale was then strangled and burnt at the stake in the prison yard, Oct. 6, 1536. His last words were, "Lord, open the king of England's eyes."
This prayer was answered three years later, in the publication of King Henry VIII’s 1539 English “Great Bible”.
======================
Reminds me of this passage:

2Ki 6:17
And Elisha prayed, and said, “LORD, I pray, open his eyes that he may see.” Then the LORD opened the eyes of the young man, and he saw. And behold, the mountain was full of horses and chariots of fire all around Elisha.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jgr
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,007
✟784,067.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
  • Winner
Reactions: BABerean2
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
LittleLambofJesus said:
But I suppose if not for the bravery of the Protestant Reformation, we would be under the Roman Papacy and Catholicism. Who knows...........
No reason to believe it wouldn't have been more of this.
Estimates of the Number Killed by the PAPACY in the Middle Ages and Later
CHAPTER 1. Examples of figures concerning the number killed
CHAPTER 2. The plausibility of massive persecution
CHAPTER 3. The 50 Million Figure
CHAPTER 4. The Spanish Inquisition
CHAPTER 5. Alethia's estimate
CHAPTER 6. An estimate based on population growth
CHAPTER 7. Indirect evidence of persecution
CHAPTER 8. Cloistered convents
CHAPTER 9. Wars
CHAPTER 10. Conclusion
Perhaps. The Dark Ages/Middle Ages were indeed trying times for Christians accused of heresy and not conforming to Rome's Papacy.
I have always been interested in past Church history, and CF has had it's share of RC vs Protestant debates, which I no longer get in involved in, at least for now.

From what I understand, Roman Catholicism is mainly Amill, which is ok with me :)

For the Last Time, Roman Catholics Aren't the Pharisees!

For the love of all that is holy people, drop the bigotry and villianizations!

Our Lord's critique of the Pharisees was based on a view of the law that lacked any attention to the intentions behind our good deeds, and their ethnocentric form of Judaism that strictly seperated Jews and Gentiles- something highly inappropriate and indeed damning in the new era.

That is not what Catholics do! Haven't you ever read St. Thomas Aquinas? Do you even know what he is? According to Catholic doctrine, derived from the Scriptures, good works that lack right intentions are worthless.

Or do you just wish to villianize Christian traditions that practice formal liturgies in their worship and sacramental forms of piety because you don't understand them and think they're just 'going through the motions'?

I wonder how many evangelicals are just 'going through the motions' when they 'give the Lord a big round of applause' or clap their hands to upbeat worship music.

Seriously, I find that whole line of argument highly offense.
Was God behind the great Schism of 1054?

This thread is actually an offshoot of another thread titled "Was God behind the Reformation" [I posted the link and OP below],
and essentially I would like to get views from others on whether God had a hand in the great schism of 1054. Here is a link to a little info on the momentus event in Christian history. Thanks and God bless

Great Schism and effect on Christianity and Theology
Great Schism and effect on Christianity and Theology

Was God behind the Reformation?
Was God behind the Reformation?

I believe I have brought this up before as a reply in another thread, but it didn't get far. So I am starting a new thread for discussion.

My question: Was God behind the Reformation?

I may not hold the exact same positions as Luther or Calvin, but what I see in all the reformers was a common desire to love Jesus.

Today, there is a lot of Protestants who love Jesus and confess Him as Lord and Savior. (Romans 10:9-10).

I can not see Satan wanting people to confess Jesus as Lord and Savior. I can not see Satan wanting people to repent for their sins and to be Christ-like. Therefore, since Satan (evil) was not behind the Reformation, God must have been. Look at how many people have been saved through Protestant/Non-denominational chruchs!

Yes, there might be a lot of different denominations, but they are all united in their belief in Jesus Christ, one of the only beliefs that truely counts! It is through Jesus we are saved.

I'm only bringing this up because a lot of Orthodox and Catholic brothers seem to look down on the Reformation (something that God had to have backed). I'm just trying to understand this position.

God bless...
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Can you answer the question in post number 211?

Based on 1 Thessalonians chapters 4, and 5, and 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10, and 2 Peter 3:10-13, the Church is gathered by Christ on the same day as the final conflagration, at His Second Coming.

.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
most Preterists/Amills have never believed in that Futuristic nonsense, but mostly saw 1st century Jerusalem as being in Revelation 18........[as do I and many others]

Can you explain how the highlighted sections apply to first century Jerusalem?


Rev 18:1 And after these things I saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was lightened with his glory.
Rev 18:2 And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.
Rev 18:3 For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.
Rev 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
Rev 18:5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.
Rev 18:6 Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled fill to her double.
Rev 18:7 How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow.
Rev 18:8 Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her.
Rev 18:9 And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication and lived deliciously with her, shall bewail her, and lament for her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning,
Rev 18:10 Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas, that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.
Rev 18:11 And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more:
Rev 18:12 The merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones, and of pearls, and fine linen, and purple, and silk, and scarlet, and all thyine wood, and all manner vessels of ivory, and all manner vessels of most precious wood, and of brass, and iron, and marble,
Rev 18:13 And cinnamon, and odours, and ointments, and frankincense, and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.
Rev 18:14 And the fruits that thy soul lusted after are departed from thee, and all things which were dainty and goodly are departed from thee, and thou shalt find them no more at all.
Rev 18:15 The merchants of these things, which were made rich by her, shall stand afar off for the fear of her torment, weeping and wailing,
Rev 18:16 And saying, Alas, alas, that great city, that was clothed in fine linen, and purple, and scarlet, and decked with gold, and precious stones, and pearls!
Rev 18:17 For in one hour so great riches is come to nought. And every shipmaster, and all the company in ships, and sailors, and as many as trade by sea, stood afar off,
Rev 18:18 And cried when they saw the smoke of her burning, saying, What city is like unto this great city!
Rev 18:19 And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas, that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.
Rev 18:20 Rejoice over her, thou heaven, and ye holy apostles and prophets; for God hath avenged you on her.
Rev 18:21 And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying, Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all.

.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,339
7,349
California
✟551,233.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Based on 1 Thessalonians chapters 4, and 5, and 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10, and 2 Peter 3:10-13, the Church is gathered by Christ on the same day as the final conflagration, at His Second Coming.

.
So you believe He comes again to collect His church and on the way out torches the rest of His creation (non-believing people included)?
 
Upvote 0