• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Colin Patterson quote: No Intermediate Fossils

gungasnake

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2013
539
4
✟830.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
For any who might not have noticed or for any late-comers here, the OP included a link to a very thorough analysis of the Patterson quote and the question of whether or not any sort of a reasonable claim of "quote mining(TM)" was there to be had. Once again:

That quote!—about the missing transitional fossils

For some of these guys to have simply ignored that and go on repeating these childish claims of "quote mining" is basically chutzvah.

Another little tidbit from that link:

 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
The thing which drove ME away from evolution was evidence and logic. I was, after all, a math major, and if something can't survive a close inspection for logic, it doesn't really work.

Let's inspect what you call logic. You claim that all of the experts say that there are no transitional fossils. I have quoted expert after expert in numerous peer reviewed scientific papers saying that there are transitional fossils. Your reply? There is no evidence for evolution nor are there any transitional fossils.

Can you please tell us how that logic of yours is working?
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
For any who might not have noticed or for any late-comers here, the OP included a link to a very thorough analysis of the Patterson quote and the question of whether or not any sort of a reasonable claim of "quote mining(TM)" was there to be had.

Patterson himself says that it was quote mined and was being misused by creationists.


Patterson Misquoted: A Tale of Two 'Cites'

You also claimed that all experts say that there are no transitional fossils. I have quoted expert after expert saying that there are transitional fossils. Are you going to retract your claim or not?
 
Upvote 0

gungasnake

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2013
539
4
✟830.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
As Darwin points out in his famous book, there should be "innumerable" intermediate links in each stratum. But upon millions and millions of fossils that have been found there is zero intermediate links. Zero.

.

It's worse than that. As Alexander Mebane (Tampa Bay Skeptics) notes ("Darwin's Creation Myth"), even the newer Gould/Eldredge/Myer flavor of evolution (punc-eek) should have left a fairly large assortment of intermediate fossils:

 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
As Darwin points out in his famous book, there should be "innumerable" intermediate links in each stratum.

Actually, Darwin discussed why there shouldn't be innumerable intermediate links.

"For my part, following out Lyell's metaphor, I look at the natural geological record, as a history of the world imperfectly kept, and written in a changing dialect; of this history we possess the last volume alone, relating only to two or three countries. Of this volume, only here and there a short chapter has been preserved; and of each page, only here and there a few lines. Each word of the slowly-changing language, in which the history is supposed to be written, being more or less different in the interrupted succession of chapters, may represent the apparently abruptly changed forms of life, entombed in our consecutive, but widely separated formations. On this view, the difficulties above discussed are greatly diminished, or even disappear."--Charles Darwin, "Origin of Species"

He spent an entire chapter discussing why there shouldn't be innumerable transitional fossils.

The Origin of Species: Chapter 9

But upon millions and millions of fossils that have been found there is zero intermediate links. Zero.

I already cited several examples of transitional fossils. Are there only 9 commandments in your bible?
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
It's worse than that. As Alexander Mebane (Tampa Bay Skeptics) notes ("Darwin's Creation Myth"), even the newer Gould/Eldredge/Myer flavor of evolution (punc-eek) should have left a fairly large assortment of intermediate fossils:

I have cited numerous experts who say that there are transitional fossils. Are you retracting your claim yet?
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
Yet another expert describing transitional fossils. This time, the author is discussing the evolution of the mammalian middle ear which included an increase in complexity. He points to several transitional reptile-like mammals.

"The origins of complex and novel structures, such as the mammalian jaw and middle ear, can be deciphered by mapping their transformation in the fossil record and phylogeny (Figure 1) and by characterizing their developmental morphogenesis. Recent discoveries of new fossils in the cynodont-mammal transition have revealed major convergences and reversals, also known as homoplasies, in the jaw and middle ear structure among Mesozoic mammaliaform clades."
An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

How is this not evidence for evolution?
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
In this case, that would amount to you and your ilk thinking yourselves to know more about paleontology than somebody like Patterson, wouldn't it?

In this case, and every case in which a creationist quotes a real scientist, I take it with a grain of salt, as creationists always quote mine. Always.

I have read what real biologists and paleontologists have to say about the matter, and none of them, not one, say what you would have us believe.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
I guess we need to quote more experts . . .

"AN unusually rich fossil record documents in great detail the evolution of synapsids (mammal-like reptiles and their descendants the mammals). This fossil record extends over 320 million years and provides extensive evidence of the transition between primitive amniotes and mammals. The superior quality of the synapsid fossil record has even enabled scientists to use it to illustrate the concept of evolution and to test evolutionary models."--Michel Laurin & Robert R. Reisz, "Tetraceratops is the oldest known therapsid", Nature 345, 249 - 250 (17 May 1990)
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
Since gungasnake considers Stephen Jay Gould to be an expert, surely he has never claimed that there are transitional fossils, right?

"The lower jaw of reptiles contains several bones, that of mammals only one. The non-mammalian jawbones are reduced, step by step, in mammalian ancestors until they become tiny nubbins located at the back of the jaw. The "hammer" and "anvil" bones of the mammalian ear are descendants of these nubbins. How could such a transition be accomplished? the creationists ask. Surely a bone is either entirely in the jaw or in the ear. Yet paleontologists have discovered two transitional lineages of therapsids (the so-called mammal-like reptiles) with a double jaw joint—one composed of the old quadrate and articular bones (soon to become the hammer and anvil), the other of the squamosal and dentary bones (as in modern mammals). For that matter, what better transitional form could we expect to find than the oldest human, Australopithecus afarensis, with its apelike palate, its human upright stance, and a cranial capacity larger than any ape’s of the same body size but a full 1,000 cubic centimeters below ours?"--Stephen Jay Gould, "Evolution as Fact and Theory"
Stephen Jay Gould, "Evolution as Fact and Theory" 1994
 
Upvote 0