What is the significants of the book of Acts and the Church?
Originally posted by BeanMak
Uh... Peter, Paul, James, Barnabas, Stephen, et al?
Originally posted by sola fide
Uh, let's see, everything is significant would be the only answer to that. The disciples (Apostles) received the commission to evangelize the world (Acts 1:8) which also spoke of the fact that they would be martyrs.
The Holy Spirit became the indwelling Spirit that we know today, that's definitely significant to the church, because without it there would be no church. The name "Christians" is given for the first time in Acts 11, that's definitely got some significance. The book is full of accounts of the earliest church, and it's leaders, who were the greatest leaders of all time...
And this is coming way short as far as all the significance of the book, but my fave passage in the book of the acts is Acts 2:42, which I believe lays out the standard for the modern, fruit bearing church-
"And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers."
That's a perfect outline for how a local community of believers should act. Learning the apostles' doctrine(the Bible), fellowshipping with fellow believers, taking of the Lord's Supper (breaking bread), and prayer. The verse before that also mentioned baptism, the other ordinance of the church explicitly commanded by Christ.
How can you go wrong if you follow these guidelines set out in scripture?
Soli Deo gloria!
Originally posted by sola fide
Honestly, as a whole, I don't think the church is anywhere near the first century church. But that is to be expected to a degree considering the fact that the apostles the church was built upon were first hand witnesses of the resurrection of Christ.
I think our modern churches are usually one sided compared to the apostolic church. For example, I think my church is great when it comes to the guidelines set out in Acts 2:42, in that we have great fellowship, etc... but I do think we're on the short side when it comes to evangelism. Some churches are the exact opposite, focusing on evangelism and neglecting true deep fellowship, and the taking of the Lord's Supper. I think if we were truly commited to prayer though, all of these things would come naturally. But sadly I think the majority of the modern church falls well short of the standards of prayer set forth by the apostles. I am no different in this aspect, because I sometimes struggle with setting aside prayer time.
I think another thing we struggle at compared to the early church is squashing heresy before it has a chance to grow. With so much heretical teaching being spread abroad these days, it's hard to tell the real church from the tares. Luckily, Christ will sort all of that out in the end. I do know that there are many local bodies complying completely to the guidelines set out in the book of Acts. Sadly, I would say, the majority are not.
Soli Deo gloria!
Originally posted by SUNSTONE
Thats what God's been telling me, that the church isn't what it is fully capable of being. BURN THE CHURCHS!!! Doh!!,I got a little carried away there.
Originally posted by The Bible is Right
What is worship like where you go to church?