I have a friend who pointed me to this article http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/arti...1309990017&cid
It's the study that said that the universe inflated in less than a trillionth of a second. My friend then demands to know how all that mass could have travelled faster than light. My non-scientific hunch is that the travelling must occur relative to light, and since light was actually a part of the expanding universe and hence was moving at its own relative speed within the universe, there is no problem. Should I stay out of physics? Or should my friend? Or both?
It's the study that said that the universe inflated in less than a trillionth of a second. My friend then demands to know how all that mass could have travelled faster than light. My non-scientific hunch is that the travelling must occur relative to light, and since light was actually a part of the expanding universe and hence was moving at its own relative speed within the universe, there is no problem. Should I stay out of physics? Or should my friend? Or both?