I'm not going to get into another debate about scripture stating that the earth is flat or a ball.Please check out my other new thread that has a better compiled list of Biblical and Scientific evidences in refuting a Flat Earth.
A New Biblical & Scientific Refutation of a Flat Earth!
Side Note:
You said the "world may not be flat." So what do you believe the Earth is then? A square? Please take note that some people do believe that kind of un-Science.
Also, the moons shadow, on the earth, during a solar eclipse should be bigger than the moon itself. Unless you can show me, in any other case, where a light, behind an object, creates a shadow that is smaller than the object itself.
I'm not going to get into another debate about scripture stating that the earth is flat or a ball.
You said:It embarrasses me when Christians warp scripture in order to comply with the atheistic, Evolutionary Darwinian and pseudo sciences of today, in order to appease their lack of ability to believe that what God said in His word has nothing to do with what a bunch of men, who consider themselves to be wise, say.
Actually, I have seen this diagram before. It's not your fault for posting it, as it is presented to actually be true.You don't seem to understand the umbra and penumbra and the relative sizes of the sun, the earth and the moon. The diagram below might help.
Your video of presenting the sun over the FE, if it were the correct model, is in error. The simple fact that the sun would only illuminate a portion of the earths surface as it moved around. This is obvious in your first slide as you can see the light and dark parts of the surface.If you believe in the popular Flat Earth model (with the sun moving like this):
Then this is what it would look like from the ground:
But that is not what we see.
Also, you should be aware that if you are still pushing or supporting a flat Earth belief (even after me showing you the truth), you are creating an unnecessary offense that can turn people away from hearing the truth of God's Word.
I don't believe in Macro-Evolution or an Old Earth. The Flat Earth belief is easily refuted by basic Science tests that even a child can figure out. I believe it is psychological why people believe in something that deals with unreality. Maybe life was hard on them in some way or the government had hurt or disapponted them somehow, so seeking something that is fictional gives them comfort or makes them feel special or better. But we should not allow our emotions to guide our critical thinking when it comes to observable Science and or the truth of God's Word.
Well, that's a "he said, she said" as there are many models of the actuality of the movement of the sun on the supposed flat earth that are much different than yours.If the sun set on a Flat Earth, it would look like this:
And there would be a period of darkness for the entire world until the sun came back up.
Your video of presenting the sun over the FE, if it were the correct model, is in error. The simple fact that the sun would only illuminate a portion of the earths surface as it moved around. This is obvious in your first slide as you can see the light and dark parts of the surface.
The FE model demands a small and very close sun. It would be like turning the lights out in a room, pointing a flashlight at the floor from about 5 inches and moving it across the floor. Only a small portion of the floor in the room would have light.
Someone has gone to a lot of trouble yet their presentation is incorrect.
Well, that's a "he said, she said" as there are many models of the actuality of the movement of the sun on the supposed flat earth that are much different than yours.
I am not a FE'er. I am investigating both models and understand them or am trying to learn.The representation is a 3D computer generated model based off your own flat Earth. There are points of darkness in this world (by which you can see, but you will always see the sun high up in the sky rotating in a circle). If the sun actually set below the horizon line or the sea level on a flat disk, you would have a period of darkness. It is scary you are not grasping this concept.
Look, the sun doesn't go below the edge of the FE model....The disk is huge, compared to the sun and it is small and close... Just keep looking, instead of trying to find those examples that debunk the FE try to find some that you can watch that support it so that you learn what they are actually trying to say instead of what Globe believers are trying to point out as wrong by twisting it.Look. Buy a pizza. Get a flash light out. Put the flash light at the edge your pizza acting like the sun is setting on our Earth. What happens when you take the flash light and you drop it below the pizza? The whole top part of the pizza is dark.
Ya, I've seen a lunar eclipse....Did you know that these can happen with the sun totally visible...
Now, the spin doctors will tell you that it is an illusion of refraction. Just like the picture of Chicago was a mirage...
Give me a break. The sun cannot be visible while the moon is covered in the earths shadow.
Also, the moons shadow, on the earth, during a solar eclipse should be bigger than the moon itself. Unless you can show me, in any other case, where a light, behind an object, creates a shadow that is smaller than the object itself.
Not to mention that it should move from east to west, not west to east....
But, all the sheeple will settle for the explanation of academia... just because it satisfies their need to keep their neat little world just as it has been since they were in kindergarten. You would not want to bring facts and logic into this nice little broken package that we are fed.
People.... wake up. The world may not be flat.... but something is wrong with the garbage that they have been feeding us about the world and universe that we live in.
Think, think, think... for yourselves and don't let them keep giving you wooden nickles and using two headed coins....We are being lied to.
So, explain how I can see the sun and the moon is totally covered by the shadow of the earth from the light of the sun? How do you explain this impossibility?Regardless of how you think the shadow comes about---it is visible to the unaided human eye and it is definitely not flat.
Look, the sun doesn't go below the edge of the FE model....The disk is huge, compared to the sun and it is small and close... Just keep looking, instead of trying to find those examples that debunk the FE try to find some that you can watch that support it so that you learn what they are actually trying to say instead of what Globe believers are trying to point out as wrong by twisting it.
So, explain how I can see the sun and the moon is totally covered by the shadow of the earth from the light of the sun? How do you explain this impossibility?
Also, explain how the moon is the only object, ever, to cast a shadow which is smaller than itself.
Look, the sun doesn't go below the edge of the FE model....The disk is huge, compared to the sun and it is small and close... Just keep looking, instead of trying to find those examples that debunk the FE try to find some that you can watch that support it so that you learn what they are actually trying to say instead of what Globe believers are trying to point out as wrong by twisting it.
Actually, I have seen this diagram before. It's not your fault for posting it, as it is presented to actually be true.
However, at the distance of 93,000 miles away, the suns light would not converge on the moon and the earth...
In fact, all rays of light from the sun would be parallel. How would the rays converge and then diverge right at the moon... This is an example of how people see something and accept it as fact when it is in all actuality..... wrong.
The diagram you are showing, actually would be more true in the FE model. Even though the fact that solar and lunar eclipses have nothing to do with Flat or Ball earth.. They are just blatantly impossible for the model presented to us by the sciences.
I am not a FE'er.
You said:I am investigating both models and understand them or am trying to learn.The sun cannot possibly be "visible" and not illuminate the area. It goes so far away that it is no longer visible and, due to perspective, sets.
You said:If you look on the net, you will see videos of the sun setting that show the track of an arc...
How does this happen on a globe that is spinning?
I am not a FE'er. I am investigating both models and understand them or am trying to learn.
The sun cannot possibly be "visible" and not illuminate the area. It goes so far away that it is no longer visible and, due to perspective, sets.
If you look on the net, you will see videos of the sun setting that show the track of an arc... How does this happen on a globe that is spinning?