royal priest
debtor to grace
- Nov 1, 2015
- 2,666
- 2,655
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Married
John Stot,You say baptism is not a sign and seal. I demonstrate that circumcision was a sign and seal. You say baptism and circumcision are not comparable. But you are having trouble maintaining this position. I'm just showing you how your position is not consistent.
"The evangelical view is that the sign [baptism] not only signifies the gift [salvation], but seals or pledges it, and pledges it in such a way as to convey not the gift itself, but a title to the gift...
The place and function of circumcision is defined in Romans 4:11 where Abraham is said to have received circumcision as a sign or seal of the righteousness which he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised. Here it is said that Abraham received two gifts. First, he received justification, acceptance by faith, while he was still uncircumcised. Secondly, he received circumcision as a sign and seal of this righteousness. The righteousness was given him in Genesis 15; its seal in Genesis 17.
Now, what circumcision was to Abraham, Issac, and his descendants, baptism is to us. It is not only the sign of the covenant membership, but a seal or pledge of covenant blessings. Baptism does not convey these blessings to us, but convey to us a right or title to them, so that if and when we truly believe, we inherit the blessings to which baptism has entitled us."
Upvote
0