Hello everyone. I have been compiling information and sharing with my family about Jesus's 12 disciples. ( I think the show the Chosen was the inspiration).
In John 1 43-50 we are introduced to the apostle Nathaniel. Nathaniel is of course not listed in the lists of the 12 disciples in Mark 3 and Matthew 10.
I have found it said that Nathaniel was actually the Apostle Bartholomew.
If you believe that Nathanael was Bartholomew, then my question is what evidence do use as a basis for that conclusion?
If you are not convinced that Nathaniel was Bartholomew then is it possible that Nathanael never actually became an apostle. and Bartholomew is a separate person?
Thank You
--Wayne
In John 1 43-50 we are introduced to the apostle Nathaniel. Nathaniel is of course not listed in the lists of the 12 disciples in Mark 3 and Matthew 10.
I have found it said that Nathaniel was actually the Apostle Bartholomew.
If you believe that Nathanael was Bartholomew, then my question is what evidence do use as a basis for that conclusion?
If you are not convinced that Nathaniel was Bartholomew then is it possible that Nathanael never actually became an apostle. and Bartholomew is a separate person?
Thank You
--Wayne