I believe they do and I would be willing to share how that all fits together.
I would like to tell you a whole lot of things all at once but lets just work slowly through it.
Most commentaries say that the "seven churches" are indeed christian churches of that early time or represent christian churches or eras from that time to this or some even say they represent contempory christian churches of today. There is no consensus really on this issue except to say that they are "christian".
It always seemed strange to me as to why these seven were spoken of /to and seemingly given so much importance by the risen Christ when apart from the Ephesus assembly no recognition of the others as assemblies had previously been mentioned in the history of the early believers.
I considered that the "bringing into line" of some wayward groups of people just didn't seem to "fit" the whole thrust of the rest of the Revelation which seemed to be exclusively end-time events - the end chapter of God's book of life.
Didn't Jesus establish the Church with Himself as the head and the five -fold ministry for the purpose of equipping the body for the work of the ministry(Eph.4:11-12).
Why then involment in this "personalised way? This to me was like Jesus becoming the head and the body. This troubled me - not because I though He had no right to do such a thing. Of course He did. Without His finished work at Calvary there would be no Church. My thoughts were that it was not His character to seemingly go back on His word: "I am the vine, you are the branches"
Questions kept coming to me which I had no answer for and I decided to seek the wisdom of God - in fact for a whole six months on this subject alone.
(more to come)
I would like to tell you a whole lot of things all at once but lets just work slowly through it.
Most commentaries say that the "seven churches" are indeed christian churches of that early time or represent christian churches or eras from that time to this or some even say they represent contempory christian churches of today. There is no consensus really on this issue except to say that they are "christian".
It always seemed strange to me as to why these seven were spoken of /to and seemingly given so much importance by the risen Christ when apart from the Ephesus assembly no recognition of the others as assemblies had previously been mentioned in the history of the early believers.
I considered that the "bringing into line" of some wayward groups of people just didn't seem to "fit" the whole thrust of the rest of the Revelation which seemed to be exclusively end-time events - the end chapter of God's book of life.
Didn't Jesus establish the Church with Himself as the head and the five -fold ministry for the purpose of equipping the body for the work of the ministry(Eph.4:11-12).
Why then involment in this "personalised way? This to me was like Jesus becoming the head and the body. This troubled me - not because I though He had no right to do such a thing. Of course He did. Without His finished work at Calvary there would be no Church. My thoughts were that it was not His character to seemingly go back on His word: "I am the vine, you are the branches"
Questions kept coming to me which I had no answer for and I decided to seek the wisdom of God - in fact for a whole six months on this subject alone.
(more to come)