Also “having company over for dinner” just took a dark turn.If cannibalism is on the menu (pun intended) the phrase "finger lickin' good" takes on a new meaning
I got it.I down with that. Given the dire situation coming our way, it sounds like an entirely modest proposal.
Swift on the uptake, this one.I got it.
I don't really know what we have such a taboo about this
or about lots of other meat sources (e.g. dog).
Even though , he was talking aboult eating people afrer they die. Would help. I have to say eat people, while they are alive would take care of over population. How ever true that is , I doubt I will be doing that.https://www.truthorfiction.com/did-a-swedish-scientist-propose-cannibalism-to-fight-climate-change/
As for the context of Söderlund’s original remarks, the primary source appeared to be Sweden-based video content with only a brief, automatically translated summary. That auto-translation, which was clearly not exact, read:
In the days the “Gastro Summit — about the future of food” is being held at the Stockholm Fair. There, behavioral scientist Magnus Söderlund holds seminars that make most people raise their eyebrows. They are about the possibility of eating human flesh — to save the climate.
For the same reason we have a taboo about incest. It's bad for us. Consuming human flesh is a great way to pass around disease. Just ask the fore peoples of New Guinea.
For two reasons. The first is that there is less biomass of carnivores because they eat herbivores. The second is, generally speaking, they taste disgusting.
Don’t eat the brain. The same risk exists with eating cows.
Dogs taste disgusting or carnivores?
If we’re talking about carnivores, then I would argue that a bunch of larger fish and at least a handful of reptiles suggest otherwise. Frogs, too.
And what if we are talking about members of the order carnivora?
over population is fake newsEven though , he was talking aboult eating people afrer they die. Would help. I have to say eat people, while they are alive would take care of over population. How ever true that is , I doubt I will be doing that.
We're already pressuring pretty much every single natural habitat on earth. Experience tells us humans are likely to manage additional population growth poorly rather than carefully.over population is fake news
every year, humanity wastes 1.3 billion tons of food
enough to feed 13 billion more people
we can currently support 20 billion people if we play our cards right
No ,it's not.over population is fake news
every year, humanity wastes 1.3 billion tons of food
enough to feed 13 billion more people
we can currently support 20 billion people if we play our cards right
yes it isNo ,it's not.