I was out having a cigar. Starry night. I remembered a few weeks ago, i saw a "UFO" it went from south to north in the western night sky fairly quickly, it looked as tiny as a star and seemed as far away, but it moved, if you put your arms out, maybe 3 feet across the sky in a straight line in a matter of seconds, faster than you see jets leaving vapor trails in the day time.
And then to my amazement i started counting last night how many i saw just moving in all directions, stars on different paths in the same manner that i described. But i stopped counting after 30 stars and grabbed the wife, she said it was an atmospheric storm. Im open to an explanation
- A bit faster than jet making contrails
- Moving in a straight line
- tracing different paths but all moving in straight line
My guess would be low earth orbit satellites. International Space Station, Tiangong space station, spent rocket parts, any manned spacecraft up there, a handful of spy satellites (from US, Russian, China, etc), mapping satellites, and scientific satellites. Any of the last two are can also potentially be spy satellites in disguise.
So there's quite a handful of them out there, and if you're watching the sky more than 1 1/2 hours you may have seen the same satellite more than once.
If what you saw is moving ridiculously fast, the light doesn't last more than few seconds, it will often be a meteorite.
Now, if what you saw is also making unimaginably high G force, extremely abrupt maneuvers like accelerating to high speed instantly and stopping / turning "in a dime" very literally speaking. Then it becomes likely you're actually seeing a "UFO" or in more modern terms a "UAP" (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena).
UAP's will almost always try to maneuver in an extremely abrupt fashion. Presumably to confuse radar, targeting computers and possibly evade particle beam / direct-energy weapons. Fully solid Electronically variable refractive index optics might keep them on target lock long enough for the direct energy weapon to bring them down. I don't think they exist yet because there's not been a need to effectively shoot down UAPs but I wouldn't be surprised if agencies like DARPA is already working on it. They'd provide little advantage in conventional warfare except possibly being lighter, smaller, and with less or no moving parts. Existing tracking systems are fully adequate in conventional warfare since we have yet to field any weapons that can maneuver like UAPs.